摘要
目的 比较蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)和简易精神状态量表(MMSE)在筛查HIV相关性神经认知障碍(HAND)中的能力.方法 用MoCA量表和MMSE量表对门诊127例HIV/AIDS患者及60例健康对照进行测试,并对测试结果进行比较和统计分析.结果 MoCA量表得分在HIV +/AIDS组(26.28 ±2.43分)和HIV-对照组(27.33±1.30分)之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).MMSE量表得分在HIV +/AIDS组(27.45 ±1.31分)和对照组(27.70±0.89分)之间没有统计学差别(P=0.139).使用MoCA量表,HIV +/AIDS组的HAND患病率明显大于对照组(x2=16.01,P<0.001).使用MMSE量表在筛查HAND患病率,两组之间无差别(x2=2.37,P=0.124).结论 MoCA量表在筛查HIV相关性认知功能损害的敏感性优于MMSE量表,比较适合目前临床上HAND的早期筛查。
Objective To compare the performance of Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA) and minimental state examination scale (MMSE) in screening HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND).Methods A case-control study of 127 HIV + and 60 HIV-individuals.All the subjects' cognitive functions were assessed using MoCA and MMSE separately.Results Mean MoCA score in cases was 26.28 ± 2.43 compared to 27.33 ± 1.30 in controls (P 〈 0.01).Mean MMSE score in cases was 27.45 ± 1.31 compared to 27.70 ±0.89 in controls (P =0.139).Using the MoCA screening revealed 43 (33.9%) cases had HAND compared with 6 (6.7 %) controls (x2 =16.01,P 〈 0.001).Using MMSE,6 (4.7%) cases and 1(1.7%) control had HAND (P=0.124).Conclusion The MoCA scale is more sensitive in deteting HAND than MMSE and is suited for the early cognitive screening of HIV patients in clinic.
出处
《中华实验和临床病毒学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2015年第3期210-212,共3页
Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology
基金
深圳市科技计划项目(201302096)
深圳市新发传染病重点专科基金
艾滋病信托基金
关键词
精神状态检查表
认知障碍
Mental statas schedule
Cogniotive dissonance