期刊文献+

MoCA和MMSE在HIV相关性神经认知损害筛查中的比较 被引量:8

Comparison of Montreal cognitive assessment scale and minimental state examination scale in screening HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders in Shenzhen, China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)和简易精神状态量表(MMSE)在筛查HIV相关性神经认知障碍(HAND)中的能力.方法 用MoCA量表和MMSE量表对门诊127例HIV/AIDS患者及60例健康对照进行测试,并对测试结果进行比较和统计分析.结果 MoCA量表得分在HIV +/AIDS组(26.28 ±2.43分)和HIV-对照组(27.33±1.30分)之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).MMSE量表得分在HIV +/AIDS组(27.45 ±1.31分)和对照组(27.70±0.89分)之间没有统计学差别(P=0.139).使用MoCA量表,HIV +/AIDS组的HAND患病率明显大于对照组(x2=16.01,P<0.001).使用MMSE量表在筛查HAND患病率,两组之间无差别(x2=2.37,P=0.124).结论 MoCA量表在筛查HIV相关性认知功能损害的敏感性优于MMSE量表,比较适合目前临床上HAND的早期筛查。 Objective To compare the performance of Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA) and minimental state examination scale (MMSE) in screening HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND).Methods A case-control study of 127 HIV + and 60 HIV-individuals.All the subjects' cognitive functions were assessed using MoCA and MMSE separately.Results Mean MoCA score in cases was 26.28 ± 2.43 compared to 27.33 ± 1.30 in controls (P 〈 0.01).Mean MMSE score in cases was 27.45 ± 1.31 compared to 27.70 ±0.89 in controls (P =0.139).Using the MoCA screening revealed 43 (33.9%) cases had HAND compared with 6 (6.7 %) controls (x2 =16.01,P 〈 0.001).Using MMSE,6 (4.7%) cases and 1(1.7%) control had HAND (P=0.124).Conclusion The MoCA scale is more sensitive in deteting HAND than MMSE and is suited for the early cognitive screening of HIV patients in clinic.
出处 《中华实验和临床病毒学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2015年第3期210-212,共3页 Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology
基金 深圳市科技计划项目(201302096) 深圳市新发传染病重点专科基金 艾滋病信托基金
关键词 精神状态检查表 认知障碍 Mental statas schedule Cogniotive dissonance
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Grant I, Atkinson JH, Hesselink JR, et al. Evidence for early central nervous system involvement in the acquired immunoddlciency syndrome (AIDS) and other human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections. Studies with neuropsychologic testing and magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med, 1987, 107: 828-836.
  • 2White DA, Heaton RK, Monsch AU. Neuropsychological studies of asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus-type-I infected individuals. The HNRC Group. HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 1995, 1 : 304-315.
  • 3Heaton RK, Clifford DB, Franklin DR, Jr, et al. HIV- associated neurocognitive disorders persist in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy: CHARTER Study. Neurology, 2010, 75: 2087 -2096.
  • 4Antinori A, Arendt G, Becker JT, et al. Updated research nosology for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Neurology, 2007. 69 : 1789-1799.
  • 5赵婷婷,黄建荣,唐咸艳,韦波.文化程度对广西HIV+/AIDS患者IHDS量表评分的影响[J].广东医学,2013,34(16):2506-2508. 被引量:4
  • 6唐娟娟,肖军.蒙特利尔认知评估量表与简易精神状态量表在认知功能障碍筛查中的应用与比较[J].实用医院临床杂志,2011,8(2):193-195. 被引量:68
  • 7Skinner S, Adewale A J, DeBlock L, et al. Neurocognitive screening tools in HIV/AIDS: comparative performance among patients exposed to antiretroviral therapy. HIV Med, 2009, 10: 246-252.
  • 8Wind AW, Schellevis FG, Van Staveren G, et al. Limitations of the Mini-Mental State Examination in diagnosing dementia in general practice. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 1997, 12 : 101-108.
  • 9Wang Z, Zheng Y, Liu L, et al. High prevalence of HIV- associated neurocognitive disorder in HIV-infected patients with a baseline CD4 count </= 350 cells/muL in Shanghai, China. Biosci Trends, 2013, 7: 284-289.
  • 10Ku NS, Lee Y, Ahn JY, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder in HIV-infected Koreans: the Korean NeuroAIDS Project. HIV Med, 2014, 15: 470-477.

二级参考文献15

共引文献70

同被引文献87

引证文献8

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部