期刊文献+

两种镇痛方式对全膝关节置换术后疼痛及关节功能影响的随机对照研究 被引量:32

Effects of two analgesic regimens on the postoperative analgesia and knee functional recovery after unilateral total knee arthroplasty—a randomized controlled trial
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨连续股神经阻滞对全膝关节置换术(TKA)后镇痛效果及关节功能的影响.方法 前瞻性收集2011年1月至2013年12月符合纳入和排除标准的患者资料,共有280例患者入组,年龄40~ 75岁,ASA分级Ⅰ~Ⅲ级.采用随机数字表法将280例患者随机分为连续股神经阻滞(CFNB)组(n=140)和静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)组(n=140).分别观察两组患者术后24、48、72 h、出院时、术后3、6、12个月运动及静息状态下的数字评价量表(NRS)评分,记录术后3、6、12个月中重度疼痛的发生情况及患者关节弯曲度和WOMAC评分,并记录补救药物使用情况及镇痛相关的不良事件.正态分布数据组间比较采用t检验;非正态分布资料组间比较采用Wilcoxon检验;计数资料采用χ^2检验,不符合χ^2检验要求的数据采用Fisher确切检验法.结果 CFNB组患者出院时、术后3、6个月运动NRS评分为3、3、3分,PCIA组患者为4、3、3分.CFNB组出院时、术后3、6个月静息NRS评分为3、1、1分,PCIA组为3、2、2分.CFNB组患者出院时(Z=-5.174,P<0.05)、术后3个月(Z =2.308,P=0.021)、6个月(Z=-2.495,P=0.013)运动NRS评分及静息NRS评分(Z=-2.405,P=0.016;Z=-4.360,P<0.05;Z=-9.268,P<0.05)均低于PCIA组.CFNB组患者术后3、6个月关节活动度为92°、103°,PCIA组患者为89°、100°;CFNB组术后3、6个月WOMAC评分为21、18分,PCIA组为24、21分,术后3个月(Z=-2.175,P=0.030)、6个月(Z=-2.471,P=0.013)CFNB组关节活动度大于PCIA组,而WOMAC评分低于PCIA组(Z=-2.467,P=0.014;Z=-2.537,P=0.011).CFNB组镇痛泵人均按压次数和补救用药次数分别为2.3和0.6次,PCIA组为2.6和1.1次,CFNB组镇痛泵人均按压次数(t=-2.984,P=0.003)及补救药物用药次数(t=-3.213,P=0.002)低于PCIA组.两组下肢肌力减退、恶心呕吐等不良事件发生率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 CFNB可减轻TKA术后疼痛且不良反应少,能够有效地提高TKA术后早、中期膝关节活动度,提高患者生活质量. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of continuous femoral block on the postoperative analgesia and functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty(TKA).Methods Two hundreds and eighty patients who underwent TKA were randomized into two groups:the group receiving continuous femoral block (CFNB) and the group receiving patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA),each group included 140 participants.Femoral nerve block with ropivacaine by ultrasonic guidance was performed in group CFNB and group PCIA were administrated with patient controlled intravenous analgesia.Numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and in motion at 24,48,72 h,3,6 and 12 months postoperatively,also the N RS scores at hospital discharge were recorded.The incidence of moderate-severity pain,as well as the degree of knee flexion and the WOMAC scores at 3,6 and 12 months after surgery were analyzed.The rescue analgesic administration and analgesia-related adverse effects were also recorded.Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation(SD) for normally distributed continuous variables and total number (percent frequency) for categorical variables.If non-normally distributed,data were expressed median inter-quartile range.Student's t-test,Wilcoxon rank test were used to compare results for continuous variables,when appropriate.Chi-square test was used to compare results for categorical variable,Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables when the number of event was less than 5.Results NRS scores of group CFNB in motion was 3(3-4) at discharge time,and 3(2-4),3(2-3) at 3 months and 6 months postoperatively,while the scores of group PCIA was 4 (4-4),3 (3-4),3 (3-4),respectively.And at rest,NRS scores of group CFNB was 3 (2-3),1 (1-2),1 (1-1) at discharge time,and 3,6 months postoperatively.Compared with group PCIA,NRS scores in motion of group CFNB at discharge time (Z =-5.174,P 〈 0.05) and 3 months(Z =2.308,P =0.021),as well as 6 months postoperatively (Z =-2.495,P =0.013),were significantly lower,also for the NRS scores at rest(Z =-2.405,P =0.016;Z =-4.360,P 〈 0.05;Z =-9.268,P 〈 0.05).The degree of knee flexion of group CFNB at 3 and 6 months postoperatively was 92 (88-97),103 (99-106),while the degree of knee flexion of group PCIA was 89 (86-95),100 (97-105);the WOMAC scores of group CFNB at 3 and 6 months postoperatively was 21 (18-26),18 (16-22),while the scores of group PCIA was 24 (20-27),21 (17-24).WOMAC scores of group CFNB was lower compared with groupPCIA at 3(Z =-2.467,P =0.014)and 6(Z =-2.537,P =0.011) months postoperatively while the degree of knee flexion of group CFNB was higher(Z =-2.175,P =0.030;Z =-2.471,P =0.013).Moreover,the frequency of bolus and frequency of rescue of group CFNB was 2.3 and 0.6,while the frequency of group PCIA was 2.6 and 1.1,the frequency of bolus and frequency of rescue were lower in group CFNB (t =-2.984,P =0.003;t =-3.213,P =0.002).The incidence of adverse events such muscle weakness of low limbs,nausea and vomiting were similar in two groups (P 〉 0.05).Conclusion CFNB can alleviate the postoperative pain after TKA with safety,help improving the shortmiddle-term functions of knee and quality of patients' lives.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第7期522-527,共6页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
基金 卫生部国家临床重点专科建设项目[财社(2011)170号] 重庆市卫生局重点项目(2013-1-008) 重庆市医学重点学科建设项目[渝卫科教(2007)2号]
关键词 关节成形术 置换 镇痛 股神经 功能恢复 Arthroplasty,replacement,knee Analgesia Femoral nerve Functional recovery
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Jones CA,Voaklander DC,Johnston DW,et al.Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population[J].J Rheumatol,2000,27 (7):1745-1752.
  • 2Shoji H,Solomonow M,Yoshino S,et al.Factors affecting postoperative flexion in total knee arthroplasty[J].Orthopedics,1990,13(6):643-649.
  • 3Carli F,Clemente A,Asenjo JF,et al.Analgesia and functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty:periarticular infiltration vs continuous femoral nerve block[J].Br J Anaesth,2010,105 (2):185-195.
  • 4张昊华,张洪,周一新,林惠华.全膝关节置换术围手术期多模式镇痛方案的临床研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,28(8). 被引量:37
  • 5Fischer HB,Simanski C J,Sharp C,et al.A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty[J].Anaesthesia,2008,63 (10):1105-1123.
  • 6Long WT,Ward SR,Dorr LD,et al.Postoperative pain management following total knee arthroplasty:a randomized comparison of continuous epidural versus femoral nerve infusion[J].J Knee Surg,2006,19(2):137-143.
  • 7Chu CP,Yap JC,Chen PP,et al.Postoperative outcome in Chinese patients having primary total knee arthroplasty under general anaesthesia/intravenous patient-controlled analgesia compared to spinal-epidural anaesthesia/analgesia[J].Hong Kong Med J,2006,12(6):442-447.
  • 8Eledjam JJ,Cuvillon P,Capdevila X,et al.Postoperative analgesia by femoral nerve block with ropivacaine 0.2% after major knee surgery:continuous versus patient-controlled techniques[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,2002,27(6):604-611.
  • 9单海华,朱常花,谢红,王琛.超声引导下连续股神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术后的镇痛效果[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2012,28(8):739-741. 被引量:47
  • 10成人术后疼痛处理专家共识[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2010,26(3):190-196. 被引量:347

二级参考文献16

  • 1叶文琴,于秀荣.股神经阻滞缓解全膝关节置换术后疼痛[J].国外医学(护理学分册),2004,23(11):516-518. 被引量:12
  • 2吴景明,白波,余楠生,卢伟杰.人工膝关节置换术后的早期康复[J].现代临床医学生物工程学杂志,2004,10(6):492-493. 被引量:11
  • 3林惠华,张晓光,牛捷平,孙晓雄.不同浓度罗哌卡因用于腋路臂丛神经阻滞的研究[J].中国实用手外科杂志,2001,15(3):153-155. 被引量:17
  • 4庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮,主编.现代麻醉学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:1413-1414.
  • 5Salinas FV, Liu SS, Mulroy MF. The effect of single-injectibn femoral nerve block versus continuous femoral nerve block af2 ter total knee arthroplasty on hospital length of stay and long- term functional recovery within an established clinical path- way. Anesth Analg, 2006,102(5):1234-1239.
  • 6Adrew TB, David WM. Analgesia following total knee arthro- plasty. Current ()pinion in Orthopaedics,2007, 18(1) : 76-80.
  • 7Marhofer P, Greher P, Kapral S. Ultrasound guidance in re- gional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth, 2005,94 (1) : 7-17.
  • 8Fowler SJ, Symons J, Sabato S, et al. Epidural analgesia com- pared with peripheral nerve blockade aftermajor knee surgery: a systematic review andmeta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth,2008, 100(2): 154-164.
  • 9Szczukowski MJ, Hines JA, Snell JA, et al. Femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty patients: a method to control postoperative pain. J Arthroplasty, 2004,19 (6) : 720-725.
  • 10SingeIyn FJ,Deyaert M,Joris D. Effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine,continuous epidural analgesia,and continuous three-in-one block on postoperative pain and knee rehabilitation after unilateral total knee arthroplasty[J].Anesthesia and Analgesia,1998.88-92.doi:10.1097/00000539-199807000-00019.

共引文献428

同被引文献267

引证文献32

二级引证文献190

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部