期刊文献+

腹腔镜联合快速康复结直肠外科手术在老年人结直肠癌治疗中的近期疗效分析 被引量:36

Short-term effect of laparoscopy in combination with fast-track colorectal surgery on colorectal cancer in the elderly
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估70岁以上老年结直肠癌患者接受腹腔镜联合快速康复结直肠外科(FTCS)治疗的安全性、可行性。方法将123例老年结直肠癌患者,随机分为腹腔镜+FTCs组(41例)、腹腔镜组(41例)和开腹组(41例)。比较患者手术效果指标,康复指标以及术后并发症等。结果腹腔镜+FTCS组与单独腔镜组或开腹组比较,其失血量、手术时间、排便时间,淋巴结清扫个数等差异无统计学意义(p〉0.05);腹腔镜+FTCS组较腔镜组或开腹组能够显著缩短患者下床时间、排气时间、首次流质时间以及住院时间(P〈0.05)。各组术后并发症发生率分别为腹腔镜十FTC3组:12.2%(5/41);腹腔镜组:34.1%(14/41);开腹组:68.3%(28/41)。腹腔镜4-FTCS组患者并发症发生率低于腹腔镜组和开腹组(x2=5.549,P=0.018;x2=28.826,P0.01),腹腔镜组患者并发症发生率显著低于开腹组(x2=9.567,P=0.002)。结论腹腔镜联合FTCS治疗方法在老年结直肠癌治疗中安全有效,是老年结直肠癌患者的理想治疗方式。 Objective To evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy in combination with fast track coloreetal surgery (FTCS) in the treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly. Methods A total of 123 patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: the laparoscopy plus FTCS group (n= 41), the laparoscopy group (n=41) and the laparotomy group (n=41). Parameters for measuring surgical quality, recovery and postoperative complications were analysed. Results No significant differences were found in age, gender, tumor location, anesthesia ASA classification, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score or complications between the three groups (P〉0.05 for all). There were no differences in blood loss, operative time, time required to resume defecation or number of lymph nodes dissected between the laparoscopy plus FTCS group and the laparoscopy or laparotomy group (P〉0.05 for all), but time taken to initiate postoperative ambulation, time taken to resume flatulence, time taken to start intake of liquid food and length of hospital stay were shorter in the laparoscopy plus FTC8 group than in the other groups (P〈0.0,5 for all). The incidence of postoperative complications was 12.2% or 5/41 in the laparoscopy plus FTCS group, which was lower than in the laparoscopy group (34. 1% or 14/41) and in the laparotomy group (68.3% or 28/41) (x2=5. 549 and 28. 826, P=0. 018 and 0.01, respectively),a statistically significant difference was also found between the latter two groups ( x2 = 9. 567, P=0. 002 ) . Conclusions Laparoscopy in combination with FTCS is safe and effective in the treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly.
出处 《中华老年医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第7期760-763,共4页 Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 腹腔镜 结直肠外科手术 Colorectal neoplasms Laparoscopes Colorectal surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2014, 64: 104-117.
  • 2Tanis PJ, Buskens C J, Bemelman WA. Laparoscopy for coloreetal cancer [J].Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol , 2014, 28 : 29-39.
  • 3Tan SJ, Zhou F, Yui WK, et al. Fast track programmes v.~ traditional care in laparoseopie colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2014, 61 : 79-84.
  • 4Feng F, Li XH, Shi H, et al. Fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy could improve postoperative recovery of low-risk rectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. J Dig Dis, 2014, 15:306 313.
  • 5Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery[J]. BMJ, 2001, 322:473-476.
  • 6Wind J, Maessen J, Polle SW, et al. Elective colon surgery according to a "fast-track" programme[J]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, 2006, 150:299-304.
  • 7Law WL, Poon JT, Fan JK, et al. Survival following laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer [J]. Int J Coloreetal Dis, 2012, 27: 1077-1085.
  • 8Manceau G, Karoui Comparative outcomes between elderly and systematic review [J ] .M, Werner A~ et al. of rectal cancer surgery non-elderly patients: a Lancet Oncol , 2012, 13: 525-536.
  • 9Feroci F, Lenzi E, Baraghini M, et al. Fast-track surgery in real life: how patient factors influence outcomes and compliance with an enhanced recovery clinical pathway after colorectal surgery[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Teeh, 2013, 23 : 259-265.
  • 10Li K, Li JP, Peng NH, et al. Fast-track improves post operative nutrition and outcomes of eolorectal surgery: ~i single-center prospective trial in China[J].Asia Pac J Clin Nutr, 2014, 23:41-47.

同被引文献288

  • 1宾艳良,凌小娟,许春花,李万霞,李刘柳.快速康复外科护理措施在结直肠癌患者围术期的应用[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(23):435-435. 被引量:1
  • 2韩蓟.结肠癌患者围手术期实施快速康复护理的临床应用[J].黑龙江医药,2012,25(5):787-789. 被引量:13
  • 3Carlo Staudacher,Andrea Vignali.Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer:The state of the art[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery,2010,2(9):275-282. 被引量:16
  • 4缪丁丁,喻军,陶霖玉,刘爽,齐柯,程新生.早期肠内营养对胃癌患者术后营养状况和免疫功能的影响[J].中国基层医药,2006,13(2):197-198. 被引量:34
  • 5Yu Z,Zhuang CL,Ye XZ,et al. Fast-track surgery in gas- trectomy for gastric cancer:a systematic review and meta- analysis [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2014, 399 ( 1 ) : 85-92.
  • 6Jia Y,Jin G,Guo S,et al. Fast-track surgery decreases the incidence of postoperative delirium and other compli- cations in elderly patients with colorectal carcinoma [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2014,399 ( 1 ) : 77-84.
  • 7Nanavati AJ,Prabhakar S. A comparative study of "fast- track" versus traditional peri-operative care protocols in gastrointestinal surgeries [J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2014,18 (4) :757-767.
  • 8Pellegrino L,Lois F,Remue C,et al. Insights into fast- track colon surgery:a plea for a tailored program [J]. Sur- gical Endoscopy,2013,27(4) : 1178-1185.
  • 9Baek SJ,Kim SH,Kim SY,et al. The safety of a "fast- track" program after laparoscopic colorectal surgery is comparable in older patients as in younger patients [J]. Surgical Endoscopy ,2013,27(4) : 1225-1232.
  • 10Feroci F,Lenzi E,Baraghini M,et al. Fast-track surgery in real life:how patient factors influence outcomes and compliance with an enhanced recovery clinical pathway after colorectal surgery [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2013,23 (3) : 259-265.

引证文献36

二级引证文献390

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部