期刊文献+

六点标记法提高盆腔肿瘤放疗摆位精度 被引量:1

Improving the setup accuracy in radiotherapy for pelvic tumors by six marks location method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:验证六点标记法与传统的三点标记法相比可否提高盆腔肿瘤摆位精度。方法:将60例盆腔肿瘤患者随机分为两组:三点标记组采用传统的三点标记法,六点标记组采用新型的六点标记法,每组各3例。治疗前在加速器拍摄射野验证片与计划系统生成的射野视野方向观(Beam's Eye View,BEV)相比较,统计X(左右)、Y(头脚)、Z(腹背)3个方向的摆位误差。结果:六点标记组与三点标记组Z方向两组差异无统计学意义(t=0.53,P>0.05),说明腹背方向六点标记法未能明显减少摆位误差;X、Y方向两组有明显统计学意义(t=3.97,P<0.05;t=3.23,P<0.05),说明左右及头脚方向六点标记法能明显减少摆位误差。结论:使用六点定位法能明显提高盆腔肿瘤患者的放疗摆位精度,且方法简便易行,具有临床推广价值。 Objective To analyze whether six marks location method could improve the setup accuracy of pelvic tumor by comparing the traditional three marks location method with six marks location method. Methods Sixty patients with pelvic tumor were randomly divided into two groups, three marks group and six marks group, each group of 30 cases. The field verification films taken by accelerator before treatment was compared with field Beam's eye view (BEV) films generated from the planning system. The setup errors of X, Y, Z three directions were analyzed by statistics. And the X, Y, Z were the representative for left and right, head and feet, back and belly, respectively. Results No significant differences were found between six marks group and three marks group in Z direction (t=-0.53, P〉0.05), which explained that in Z direction, six marks location method could not reduce setup errors. There were significant differences in X and Y directions (t=3.97, P〈0.05; t=- 3.23, P〈0.05), which showed that in X and Y directions, six marks location method could significantly reduce setup errors. Conclusion With simple and convenient operation, six marks location method can significantly improve the setup accuracy for patients with pelvic tumor, so the method has the value of clinical practice.
出处 《中国医学物理学杂志》 CSCD 2015年第4期578-581,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
关键词 盆腔肿瘤 定位标记 负压真空垫 摆位误差 pelvic tumor location mark negative pressure vacuum pad setup error
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1胡逸民,杨定宇.肿瘤放射治疗技术[M].北京:北京医科大学、中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1991:1.
  • 2Mutic S, Dempsey JF, Bosch WR, et al. Multimodality image registration quality assurance for conformal three-dimensional treat- ment planning[J]. Int Radiat Oncol Boil Phys, 2001, 51 (1): 255-260.
  • 3Duffton A, McNee S, Muirhead R, et al. Clinical commissioning of online seed matching protocol for prostate radiotherapy [J]. Br J Radiol, 2012, 85(1020): 1273-1281.
  • 4Greet PB, Dalai K, Ebert MA, et al. Comparison of prostate setup accuracy and margins with off-line bony anatomy corrections and online implanted fiducial-based corrections [J]. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2008, 52(5): 511-516.
  • 5Graf R, Wust P, Budach V, et al. Potentials of on-line repositioning based on implanted fiducial markers and electronic portal imaging in prostate cancer radiotherapy[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2009, 4(13): 1-9.
  • 6McLaughlin PW, Evans C, Feng M, et al. Radiographic and anatomic basis for prostate contouring errors and methods to improve prostate contouring accuracy [J]. Int J Radiat Oneol Biol Phys, 2010, 76: 369-378.
  • 7McLaughlin PW, Wygoda A, Sahijdak W, et al. The effect of patient position and treatment technique in conformal treatment of prostate cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1999, 45: 407-413.
  • 8Michalski JM, Bae K, Roach M, et al. Long-term toxicity following 3D conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer from the RTOG 9406 phase I/II dose escalation study [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010, 76: 14-22.
  • 9Michalski JM, Purdy JA, Winter K, et al. Preliminary report of toxicity following 3D radiation therapy for prostate cancer on 3DOG/RTOG 9406 [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000, 46: 391-402.
  • 10Nakamura N, Shikama N, Takahashi O, et al. Variability in bladder volumes of full bladders in defmitive radiotherapy for cases of localized prostate cancer [J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2010, 186: 637- 642.

共引文献3

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部