期刊文献+

国内外机构知识库评价研究进展与评述 被引量:15

Research Progress and Review on the Institutional Repository Evaluation
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]机构知识库评价研究意义重大,通过对国内外机构知识库评价研究实践的总结和分析,揭示当前机构知识库评价研究进展,为进一步研究提供方向。[方法/过程]基于文献分析,从评价内容、评价指标、评价方法三方面进行机构知识库评价研究评述。其中,机构知识库评价内容主要包括系统软件、数字资源管理、机构成员态度、实践建设、影响因素、绩效评价等方面;评价指标主要包括8种类型;评价方法主要包括平衡记分卡法、焦点小组访谈法、链接分析法等。[结果/结论]目前机构知识库评价研究已取得显著进展,但在用户多元化评价、定量指标设置等方面仍有待进一步研究。 [ Purpose/significance ] Institutional repository evaluation is of great significance. Through the summary and analysis of the practices on institutional repository evaluation at home and abroad, this paper reveals research progress on institutional repository evaluation and provides direction for the further research. [ Method/process] This paper summarizes research progress on institutional repository evaluation from three aspects of evaluation contents, evaluation index, evaluation methods based on literature analysis. Evaluation contents of institutional repository consist of system software, digital resource management, attitude of institutional members, practice and development, influencing factors and performance evaluation. Evaluation indexes of institutional repository consist of eight types. Evaluation methods of institutional repositories consist of methods of balanced scorecard, focus group interview and link analysis. [ Result/conclusion ] The practices on institutional repository evaluation have made significant progress so far, however it still needs to improve.
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第9期127-135,共9页 Library and Information Service
基金 华南师范大学研究生科研创新基金资助项目"机构知识库评价研究"(项目编号:2014ssxm65)研究成果之一
关键词 机构知识库 评价指标 评价体系 institutional repository evaluation index evaluation system
  • 相关文献

参考文献82

  • 1Bjrk B C, Iamkso M, Welling P, et al. Anatomy of green open access [ J ]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014,65 ( 2 ) : 237 - 250.
  • 2袁顺波,华薇娜,马学良.国内外机构库评价研究现状述评[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(11):5-8. 被引量:10
  • 3孙坦,陶俊.2002-2009年国外机构仓储评价研究述评[J].图书馆建设,2010(4):6-9. 被引量:14
  • 4Open Society Institute. A guide to institutional repository software [ R/OL]. [ 2015 - 01 - 17 ]. http ://www. budapestopenaccessini- tiative, org/pdf/OSI_Guide_to_IR_Software_v3, pdf.
  • 5Bankier J G, Gleason K. Institutional repository software compari- son[ EB/OL ]. [ 2015 - O1 - 31 ]. http ://disde. minedu, gob. pe/ xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/2899/Institutional% 20Repo sitory% 20Software% 20Comparison. pdf? sequence = 1.
  • 6Singh S K, Witt M, Dorothea S. A comparative analysis of institu- tional repository software [ C/OLd. [ 2015 - 02 - 26 ]. http:// www. orl0. es/Resources/documentos/GSabstracts/AComparative AnalysislnstitutionalRepositorySoftware. pdf.
  • 7Chan D L H, Kwok C S Y, Yip S K F. Changing roles of referencelibrarians: The case of the HKUST Institutional Repository [ J 1. Reference Services Review ,2005,33 ( 3 ) :268 - 282.
  • 8Jones R D. DSpace and ETD-db comparative evaluation[ R/OL]. [2015 -02 -26 ]. http://www, era. lib. ed. ac. uk/bitstream/ 1842/169/1/ComparativeEvaluation. pdf.
  • 9Marill J L, Luczak E C. Evaluation of digital repository software at the National Library of Medicine [ J/OL]. [ 2015 - 02 - 26 ]. ht- tp ://www. dlib. org/dlib/mayO9/marill/05 marill, html.
  • 10杨思洛,韩淑娟.机构知识库系统软件现状及评价方法[J].公共图书馆,2007(4):26-29. 被引量:3

二级参考文献338

共引文献260

同被引文献165

引证文献15

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部