期刊文献+

经营者集中反垄断执法的透明度:域外经验与中国选择 被引量:3

Transparency at Undertakings Concentration Antimonopoly Law Enforcement:Abroad Experiences and Chinese Choices
原文传递
导出
摘要 透明度是经营者集中反垄断执法的重要原则。基于不同制度基础,美国和欧盟在经营者集中反垄断执法实践中采用了各自不同的做法。美国和欧盟经营者集中反垄断执法透明度具有适用范围的广泛性、适用方式的综合性、适用标准的不确定性和适用过程的政治影响性等显著特征。借鉴美国和欧盟的先进做法和成熟经验,我国应当结合现实国情,加紧出台《反垄断法》实施细则或者条例,尽快发布经营者集中指南,完善经营者集中反垄断执法程序,拓展经营者集中审查决定内容,公布经营者集中救济案件后续信息,建立经营者集中反垄断执法网络平台,不断提高我国经营者集中反垄断执法的透明度。 Transparency is an important principle at undertakings concentration antimonopoly law enforcement.As the difference of system basis, America and European Union respectively take different practices at undertakings concentration antimonopoly law enforcement.America and European Union have distinct characteristics including universality of Scope of application, comprehensiveness of mode of application, uncertainty of standard of application, political effect of process of application.Reference on the modern practices and mature experiences of America and European Union, China should formulate detailed rules and regulations on antimonopoly law enforcement, issue merger guidelines, improve antimonopoly law enforcement procedure, expand the contents of review decisions,publish the consistent information of merger remedies, build internet platform of undertakings concentration antimonopoly law enforcement on the basis of taking account of real national conditions.
作者 袁日新
出处 《理论界》 2015年第7期74-82,共9页 Theory Horizon
基金 2012年度教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目"经营者集中救济法律制度研究--以不同产业的适用为中心视角"(12YJC820132)的研究成果
关键词 经营者集中 反垄断执法 透明度 undertakings concentration antimonopoly law enforcement transparency
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Malcolm B.Coate and Shawn W.Ulfick, Transparency at the Federal Trade Commission: The Horizontal Merger Review Process 1996-2003, Bureau of Economics Federal Trade Commission, February, 2005: 1.
  • 2Horizontal Merger Investigation Data, Fiscal Years 1996-2003 [EB, OL] . (2004-02-15) [2015-03-07] .http: //www.flc.gov/ '/horizmenzer.htm.
  • 3Warren SGrimes.Transparency in Federal Antitrust Enforcement [J] .51 Buffalo L. Rev.937, fall, 2003: 14.
  • 4Thomas O.Barnett.Current Issues in Merger Enforcement: Thoughts on Theory, Litigation Practice, and Retrospectives [EBL] . (2008-06-28) [2015-03-27] .http: /Avww.justice.go/atrublio/speeches/234537.htm.
  • 5Case No COMPAM.4439-Ryanaiv'Aer Lingus, Commission decision, 27A26.'2007.
  • 6吴津.论欧共体竞争法内部合作机制的构建与发展——欧洲竞争网络研究[J].湖北社会科学,2011(8):102-107. 被引量:3
  • 7Keith R.Fisher, Transparency in Global Merger Review: A Limited Role for the WTO? Stanford Journal of Law,Business &Finance, spring, 2006: 336.
  • 8谢晓尧.WTO透明度:固有价值与保障机制[J].法学,2003(1):72-76. 被引量:13
  • 9[英]威廉韦德.行政法[M].徐炳译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1997.
  • 10袁日新.经营者集中反垄断执法的透明度——基础、功能与限制[J].行政与法,2014(6):16-22. 被引量:4

二级参考文献106

共引文献149

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部