标准大骨瓣减压术与常规骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤疗效对比

Comparison of Standard Large Craniectomy With Routine Craniectomy in Treatment of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

目的探讨标准大骨瓣减压术与常规骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤的临床疗效。方法选自2013年1月~2014年9月我院收治的重型颅脑损伤患者102例,将其随机分成2组,分别命名为观察组和对照组。观察组患者给予标准大骨瓣减压术进行治疗,对照组患者给予常规骨瓣开颅术进行治疗。结果观察组患者术后6天颅内压及术后30天神经缺损评分低于对照组患者。结论标准大骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑损伤临床疗效显著。

Objective To investigate the standard with conventional craniotomy clinical efficacy for treatment of severe traumatic brain injury. Methods Patients with severe traumatic brain injury is selected from January 2013 to September 2014 in our hospital 102 cases were randomly divided into two groups, named observation group and the control group. The observation group were treated with standard treatment, the control group were treated with conventional craniotomy for treatment. Results The patients in the observation group six days and 30 days after intracranial nerve defect rates lower than the control group patients. Conclusion The standard treatment of severe traumatic brain injury significant clinical effect, this type of treatment should be promoted in clinical practice.