期刊文献+

两种杨树矮林地上生物量及树皮比例早期测算 被引量:1

Biomass and Bark Content Estimation of Two Poplar Clones in Short Rotation Coppice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过建立茎干离地22 cm的直径(D22)与单枝地上生物量的关系,估算林分地上生物量,并对三倍体毛白杨B301和欧美杨107在3种栽植密度下林分地上生物量及收获物质量进行早期测算。结果表明:三倍体毛白杨B301林分各栽植密度的单枝地上生物量和单枝树皮地上生物量差异均不显著;欧美杨107在20 000株/hm2栽植密度下,单枝地上生物量和单枝树皮地上生物量均显著小于栽植密度为5 000株/hm2;2种杨树林分地上生物量和林分树皮地上生物量均随着栽植密度的增大而增大,且各栽植密度间的差异达到了极显著水平。 In order to estimate the quality of biomass before harvesting, an a11ometric regression of bark percentage of total aboveground biomass and D22( diameter at 22 em height) was developed in two poplar short-rotation coppice systems. There was no significant difference in shoot biomass and bark biomass of triploid Populus tomentosa B301 (( P. tomentosa×P. bolleana) ×P. tornentosa) plantation, however, the shoot biomass and bark biomass of Populus×euramericana cv. '74/76' plantation in the density of 5 000 plants/hm^2 were significantly higher than those in 20 000 plants/hm^2. Both triploid Populus tomentosa B301 and Populus×euramericana cv. '74/76' showed significant difference in biomass and bark content between different densities.
出处 《东北林业大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第7期102-109,共8页 Journal of Northeast Forestry University
基金 2012年高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(优先发展领域)课题(20120014130001)
关键词 杨树 短轮伐期矮林 林分地上生物量 树皮比例 Poplar Short rotation coppice Stand biomass Bark content
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1McAlpine R, Brown C, Herrick A. "Silage" sycamore[J]. Forest farmer, 1966, 26(1) : 6-7.
  • 2Herrick A, Brown C. A new concept in cellulose production silage sycamore[ Jl. Agriculture Science, 1967, 5: 8-13.
  • 3Dickmann D, Stuart K. The culture of poplar in eastern north a- merica[M]. East Lansing: Michigan State University, 1983.
  • 4Eckenwalder J. Systematic and evolution of populus[M]//Stettler R, Bradshaw J, Heilman P, et al. Biology of populus and its im- plications for management and conservation. Ottawa: NRC Re- search Press, 1996: 7-32.
  • 5Bradshaw H, Ceulemans R, Davis J, et al. Emerging model sys- tems in plant biology: poplar (Populus) as a model forest tree [ J ]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2000, 19(3): 306-313.
  • 6Dickmann D. A review of the genus populus [ M ]//Dickmann D, Isebrands J, Eckenwalder J, et al. Poplar culture in north america. Ottawa: NRC Research Press, 2001:1-42.
  • 7Balatinecz J, Kretschmann D. Properties and utilization of poplarwood[ M]//Dickmann D, Isebrands J, Eckenwalder J, et al. Pop- lar culture in north america. Ottawa: NRC Research Press, 2001, 277-291.
  • 8Cannell M, Willett S. Shoot growth phenology, dry matter distribu- tion and root: shoot ratios of provenances of populus trichocarpa, picea sitchensis and pinus controla growing in scotland [ J ]. Silvae Genetica, 1976, 25(2) : 49-59.
  • 9Dillen S, Marron N, Bastien C, et al. Effects of environment and progeny on biomass estimations of five hybrid poplar families grown at three contrasting sites across Europe [ J ]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 252(1) : 12-23.
  • 10Ceulemans R, Pontailler J, Mau F, et al. Leaf allometry in young poplar stands: reliability of leaf area index estimation, site and clone effects[ J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 1993, 4 (5) : 315- 321.

二级参考文献18

共引文献49

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部