期刊文献+

非传统激波封口设计在高超声速进气道中应用可行性研究 被引量:3

Feasibility of Applying a Non-Traditional Shock-on-Lip Design to Hypersonic Inlet
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在马赫数4,5,6条件下借助轴对称数值模拟对4个高超声速轴对称进气道性能,即传统激波封口进气道、非传统激波封口进气道、改进非传统激波封口进气道和弯曲激波进气道,进行了比较研究。传统激波封口设计要求进气道各道外压缩激波在设计状态一起交于唇口,非传统激波封口设计要求各道外压缩激波分别在不同马赫数下交于唇口。结果表明:与传统激波封口进气道相比,非传统激波封口进气道在非设计状态的流量系数明显更高但在设计状态的总压恢复系数偏低;合理地改进设计能够减少非传统激波封口设计造成的总压损失。 Performance of four hypersonic triple-cone inlets,namely,a traditional shock-on-lip inlet,a nontraditional shock-on-lip inlet,an improved non-traditional shock-on-lip inlet and a curved shock inlet,was investigated by axisymmetric numerical simulation at Mach number 4,5,6,respectively. The non- traditional shock-on-lip design requires the shock waves of an inlet to meet the cowl lip respectively at different Mach numbers,which is different from the traditional shock-on-lip design that requires external compression shock waves to meet the cowl lip together at the design condition. Results show,compared with the traditional shock-on-lip inlet,the non-traditional shock-on-lip inlet delivers obviously higher flow rate coefficient at off-design conditions but lower total pressure recovery coefficient at design condition. Proper improvement design can reduce the total pressure loss caused by the non-traditional shock-on-lip inlet design.
作者 黄思源
出处 《推进技术》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第7期976-981,共6页 Journal of Propulsion Technology
关键词 高超声速轴对称进气道 波系配置 可行性 Hypersonic axisymmetric inlet Shocks arrangement Feasibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Curran E T. Scramjet Engines: The First Forty Years [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2001, 17 (6): 1138-1148.
  • 2Pearson L W. Hypersonic Research Engine Projeet. Phase 2A: Inlet Program [R]. NASA-CR-66797.
  • 3Waltrup P J, White M E, Zarlingo F, et al. History of Ramjet and Seramjet Propulsion Development for U. S. Navy Missiles [J]. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 1997, 18(2): 234-243.
  • 4Colville J R, Starkey R P, Lewis M J. Extending the Flight Maeh Number of the SR- 71 Inlet [R]. AIAA 2005-3284.
  • 5Mcclinton C, Roudakov A, Semenov V, et al. Compara- tive Flow Path Analysis and Design Assessment of an Ax- isymmetric Hydrogen Fueled Scramjet Flight Test En- gine at a Mach Number of 6.5 [R]. AIAA 96-4571.
  • 6Mahoney J J. Inlets for Supersonic Missiles [ M ]. Wash- ington: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronat-ics , 1990.
  • 7Chyu W J, Kawamura T, Bencze D P. Navier - Stokes Solutions for Mixed Compression Axisymmetric Inlet Flow with Terminal Shock [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1989, 5(1): 4-5.
  • 8Jesse R C, Ryan P S, Mark J L. Axisymmetric Inlet De- sign for Combined-Cycle Engines [J]. Journal of Pro- pulsion and Power, 2006, 22(5): 1049-1058.
  • 9Fan X Q, Li H, Jia D, et al. Experimental Investiga- tion on Forced Boundary-Layer Transition of Axisymmet- ric Inlet and Numerical Verification [J]. Journal of Air- craft, 2006, 43(5): 1544-1549.
  • 10Wang Y W, Sislian J P. Numerical Simulation of Gas- eous Hydrocarbon Fuel Injection in a Hypersonic Inlet [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2010, 26 (5): 1114-1124.

二级参考文献31

共引文献23

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部