期刊文献+

CT灌注成像对表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗肺腺癌疗效的评估价值研究 被引量:1

Efficacy Evaluation of EGFR-TKI for Lung Adenocarcinoma by CT Perfusion Imaging
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨CT灌注成像(CTPI)对表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI)治疗肺腺癌临床疗效的评估价值。方法选择2011年11月—2013年7月在河北医科大学第四医院肿瘤内科、呼吸科和胸外科采用EGFR-TKI二线治疗的肺腺癌患者32例。根据疗效将患者分为缓解组和未缓解组。收集患者一般资料(年龄、性别、体力状况、临床分期),对比分析两组患者治疗前和治疗后2、4、6个月病灶CTPI参数〔血流量(BF)、血容量(BV)、平均通过时间(MTT)、表面通透性(PS)〕。结果缓解组11例,未缓解组21例。缓解组患者年龄为(55.2±3.2)岁,未缓解组为(57.4±4.5)岁,差异无统计学意义(t=1.437,P=0.163)。两组患者男性比例、美国东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分、临床分期比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者BF、BV与时间存在交互作用(P<0.05);BF、BV在不同时间点比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);BV在不同组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。缓解组BF治疗后4、6个月均低于治疗前和治疗后2个月(P<0.05)。缓解组BV治疗后2、4、6个月均低于治疗前,治疗后4个月低于治疗后2个月,治疗后6个月高于治疗后4个月(P<0.05);未缓解组BV治疗后4、6个月均高于治疗前,治疗后6个月高于治疗后2个月和治疗后4个月(P<0.05)。结论 CTPI可以量化反映肿瘤微血管的代谢功能,为精准评价EGFR-TKI二线治疗肺腺癌的疗效提供参考。 Objective To investigate the evaluation value of CT perfusion imaging (CTPI) for EGFR - TKI treatment for lung adenocarcinoma. Methods The study enrolled 32 patients with lung adenooareinoma who underwent EGFR - TKI second - line treatment in the Department of Medical Oncology, the Department of Pneumology and the Department of Chest Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from December 2011 to July 2013. According to efficacy, the patients were divided into remission group and non - remission group. The general data of the subjects were collected, including age, gender, performance status and clinical staging. Before treatment, and two months, four months and six months after treatment, comparison was made between the two groups on CTPI parameters (BF, BV, MTF and PS) . Results The study assigned 11 patients to the remission group and 21 patients to the non -remission group. The age range was (55.2 + 3.2) for the remission group and (57.4 ~: 4. 5 ) for the non - remission group, with no significant difference between them ( t = 1. 437, P = O. 163 ). The two groups were not significantly different in the proportion of male patients, ECOG score and clinical staging (P 〉 0.05 ). Interaction effect was noted between BF, BV and time ( P 〈 0. 05 ) ; significant difference was noted between BF and BV at different time points ( P 〈 0. 05 ) ; BV was significantly different between the two groups ( P 〈 0. 05 ) . Four months and six months after treatment, BF decreased significantly in patients of the remission group, compared with two months before and after treatment (P 〈 O. 05) . The remission group had lower BV two months, four months and six months after treatment than that before treatment (P 〈 O. 05), and it had lower BV four months after treatment than two months after treatment ( P 〈 O. 05), while it had higher BV six months after treatment than four months after treatment ( P 〈 0. 05 ) . The non - remission group had higher BV four months and six months after treatment than before treatment, and it had higher BV six months after treatment than two months and four months after treatment. Conclusion CTPI can reflect quantitative tumor microvascular metabolic function of capillaries in tumors, it provides references for accurate efficacy evaluation of EGFR -TKI second - line treatment for lung adenocarcinoma.
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第21期2611-2614,共4页 Chinese General Practice
关键词 肺肿瘤 腺癌 表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂 灌注成像 治疗结果 Lung neoplasms Adenocarcinoma EGFR - TKI Perfusion imaging Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Miller AB, Visentin T, Howe GR. The effect of hysterectomies and screening on mortality from cancer of the uterus in Canada[J]. IntJ Cancer, 1981, 27 (5): 651-657.
  • 2Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada[J]. 1 Natl Cancer Inst, 2000, 92 (3): 205 -216.
  • 3Nishino M,Jackman DM, Hatabu H, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) guidelines for advanced non - small cell lung cancer: comparison with original RECIST and impact on assessment of tumor response to targeted therapy[J] . AJR Am 1 Roentgenol, 2010, 195 (3): W221- 228.
  • 4MolinaJR, Yang P, Cassivi SD, et al. Non - small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship[J]. Mayo Clin Proc, 2008, 83 (5): 584 -594.
  • 5Karrison TG, Maitland ML, Stadler WM, et al. Design of phase II cancer trials using a continuous endpoint of change in tumor size: application to a study of sorafenib and erlotinib in non small - cell lung cancer[J]. 1 Natl CancerInst, 2007, 99 (19): 1455 -1461.
  • 6Ratain Ml, Eckhardt SG. Phase II studies of modem drugs directed against new targets: if you are fazed, too, then resist RECIST[J]. 1 Clin Oneol, 2004, 22 (22): 4442 -4445.
  • 7唐磊,孙应实,沈琳,李健,曹崑,齐丽萍,崔湧,张晓鹏.CT值变化率在胃肠道间质瘤靶向治疗影像学评效的应用研究[J].当代医学,2010,16(8):32-35. 被引量:4
  • 8Benjamin RS, Choi H, Macapinlac HA, et al. We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST[J].J Clin Oneol, 2007, 25 (13): 1760 -1764.
  • 9Fraioli F, Anzidei M, Serra G, et al. Whole - tumour CT - perfusion of unresectable lung cancer for the monitoring of anti - angiogenetic chemotherapy effects[J]. Br 1 Radiol, 2013, 86 (1029): 20120174.
  • 10Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts 1, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1. 1)[J]. Eur 1 Cancer, 2009, 45 (2): 228 -247.

二级参考文献10

  • 1沈琳,金懋林.甲磺酸伊马替尼治疗复发或转移性胃肠间质瘤[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2004,26(11):697-699. 被引量:27
  • 2Siehl J,Thiel E.C-kit,GIST,and imatinib.Recent Results.Cancar Res.2007.176:145-151.
  • 3Menu Y.Evaluation of tumor response to treatment with targeted therapies:standard or targeted criteria? Bull Cancer,2007,94(7):231-239.
  • 4Choi H,Charnsangavej C,Faria SC,et al.Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate:proposal of new computed tomography response criteria.J Clin Oncol,2007.25(13):1753-1759.
  • 5Benjamin RS,Choi H.Macapinlac HA et el.We should desist using RECIST,at least in GIST.J Clin Oncol,2007,25(13);1760-1764.
  • 6Antonescu CR.Gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST)pathogenesis familial GIST.and animal models.Semin Diagn Pathol,2006.23(2):63-69.
  • 7Demetri GD,Benjamin RS,Blanke CO,et.al.NCCN Task Force report:management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST)-update of the NCCN clinical practice guidelines.J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2007,5(Suppl 2):1-29.
  • 8Burkill GJ,Badran M Al-Muderis O,et al.Malignant gastrointestinal atromal tumor:distribution imaging features,end pattern of metastatic spread.Radiology,2003.226(2):527-532.
  • 9张晓鹏,唐磊,沈琳,李健,孙应实,迟永堃,段珊珊.伊马替尼治疗胃肠间质瘤早期疗效评价研究[J].中国实用外科杂志,2008,28(12):1058-1061. 被引量:11
  • 10张森,万德森.胃肠道间质瘤的诊治进展[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2003,6(5):347-349. 被引量:9

共引文献3

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部