期刊文献+

意识指数监测在无痛肠镜检查术中的应用效果 被引量:4

Clinical effect of index of consciousness in painless enteroscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 观察意识指数(index of consciousness,IoC)监测在无痛肠镜检查术中的临床效果。方法 选择自愿行无痛肠镜的男性患者200例,年龄18-65岁,随机均分为观察组(IoC组)和对照组(C组)。两组患者均采用TCI丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼麻醉,丙泊酚血浆靶浓度从4.0μg/ml起始,瑞芬太尼0.05μg·kg-1·min-1持续泵注。IoC组IoC指数保持在50±3,根据IoC值调整丙泊酚靶浓度;C组术中根据血流动力学及体动反应调整麻醉深度。记录给药前即刻(T1)、睫毛反射消失(T2)、过脾曲(T3)、过肝曲(T4)和苏醒时(T5)的MAP、HR、SpO2及镜检时间、丙泊酚用量、术后苏醒时间、定向力恢复时间及正常行走时间,观察术中不良反应发生情况。结果 与C组比较,IoC组丙泊酚用量明显减少,苏醒时间及定向力恢复时间明显缩短(P〈0.05),体动发生率明显降低(P〈0.05)。两组镜检时间、正常行走时间和呼吸抑制、头晕、恶心呕吐等不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义。结论 IoC监测用于无痛肠镜检查术可减少麻醉药物用量,缩短恢复时间。 Objective To investigate clinical effect of monitoring index of consciousness(IoC)during painless enteroscopy.Methods A total of 200 male patients,aged 18-65 years,were recruited and randomly allocated into observation group(group IoC)and control group(group C).Propofol was titrated based on target controlled infusion(initial plasm concentration 4.0μg/ml)combined with continuous remifentanil 0.05μg·kg^-1·min^-1 administration in both groups.Propofol was adjusted to maintain IoC vaule at 50±3in group IoC,while in group C intraoperative hemodynamic and body dynamic response based on the judgement whether to adjust the depth of anesthesia.MAP,HR and SpO2 were observed in the following timepoints:baseline(T1),loss of eyelash reflex(T2),passing splenic flexure of colon(T3),passing hepatic flexure of colon(T4)and recovery(T5).Enteroscopic examination time,dosage of propofol,postoperative emergence time,recovery time of orientation,time of normally walking and perioperative side effects were recorded.Results Decreased amount of propol dosage,shorter time of recovery and shorter time of orientation were founded and lowered incidence of body motility was observed in group IoC when compared to group C.There were no statistical significance about enteroscopic examination time,time of normally walking,incidence of respiration inhibition,dizziness and postoperative nausea and vomiting between two groups.Conclusion The IoC monitoring can reduce the dosage of anesthetic drugs and shorten the recovery time in painless enteroscopic examination.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第7期675-677,共3页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 意识指数监测 丙泊酚 肠镜检查 Index of consciousness monitroing Propofol Enteroscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1辛鑫,赵晶,黄宇光.意识指数与脑电双频指数监测靶控丙泊酚全麻诱导时镇静深度的比较[J].基础医学与临床,2011,31(12):1363-1365. 被引量:26
  • 2康芳,李娟,柴小青,王松.BIS联合AAI指导妇科腔镜手术麻醉深度调控的临床研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2013,29(9):850-852. 被引量:13
  • 3姜丽华,赵军博,张怡,王涛,魏晓永,李黎.意识指数监测在妇科腹腔镜手术中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2014,30(4):363-365. 被引量:15
  • 4Jensen EW,Jospin M,Gambus PL, et al. Validation of the In dex of Consciousness(IoC) during sedation/analgesia for ul- trasonographic endoscopy. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2008,2008 : 5552-5555.
  • 5Trapani G,Altomare C,Liso G. Propofol in anesthesia:mech- anism of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug de- livery. Curr Med Chem, 2000,7 (2) : 249-271.
  • 6Mosta{a H, el-Shamaa H, el-Refaai N, et al. Randomized double blind comparison between sciatic-femoral nerve block and propofol-remifentanil, propofol-alfentanil general anes- thetics in out-patient knee arthmscopy. PakJ Biol Sci,2008, 11 (3) : 359-365.
  • 7郭文俊,薛庆生,于布为.氯胺酮对瑞芬太尼诱发切口痛大鼠痛觉敏化的干预效应[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2012,28(12):1213-1215. 被引量:4
  • 8Moerman AT, Herregads LL, De Vos MM, et al. Manual ver- sus target-controlled infusion remifentanil administration in spontaneously breathing patients. Anesth Analg, 2009, 108 (3) : 828-834.
  • 9Revuelta M,Paniagua P, Campos JM, et al. Validation of the index of consciousness during sevoflurane and remifentanil anaesthesia~ a comparison with the bispectral index and the cerebral state index. Br J Anaesth, 2008,101 (5) : 653-658.
  • 10Maestre ML, Revuelta ME, Fernandez JA, et al. Assessment of the index of consciousness(IoC) during sevoflurane anes- thesia. Anesthesiology, 2007,107 : A78.

二级参考文献23

  • 1陈斌,刘斌.全身麻醉深度监测研究的新进展[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2004,25(5):298-301. 被引量:18
  • 2刘靖,米卫东,张宏.听觉诱发电位指数、脑电双频指数及心血管反应评估“过浅麻醉”的价值[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(6):403-405. 被引量:20
  • 3Lennmarken C, Sandin R. Neuromonitoring for awareness during surgery [ J ]. Lancet, 2004, 363 : 1747 - 1748.
  • 4Kent CD, Domino KB. Awareness : practice, standards, and the law[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2007, 21:369 - 383.
  • 5Revuelta M, Paniagua P, Campos JM, et al. Validation of the index of consciousness during sevoflurane and remifen- tanil anaesthesia: a comparison with the bispectral index and the cerebral state index[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2008, 101 : 653 - 658.
  • 6Vakkuri A, Yli-Hankala A, Sandin R, et al. Spectral en- tropy monitoring is associated with reduced propofol use andfaster emergence in propofol-nitrous oxide-alfentanil anes- thesia[ J ]. Anesthesiol, 2005, 103:274 - 279.
  • 7Recart A, White PF, Wang A, et al. Effect of auditory e- voked potential index monitoring on anesthetic drug require- ments and recovery profile after laparoscopic surgery: a clinical utility study [ J ]. Anesthesiol, 2003, 99 : 813 - 818.
  • 8Sandier NA. Additional clinical observations utilizing bis- pectral analysis [.l ]. Anesth Prog, 2000, 47 : 84 - 86.
  • 9Blackburn P, Vissers R. Pharmacology of emergency de- partment pain management and conscious sedation [ J ]. Med Clin North Am, 2000, 18:803 - 827.
  • 10Mohamed M, Robert I, Maya J, et aI. Awareness during an- esthesia: risk factors, causes and sequelae: a review of repot ted cases in the literature. Anesth Analg, 2009, 108 (2) 527-535.

共引文献50

同被引文献37

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部