期刊文献+

新辅助化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌的Meta分析 被引量:6

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer:A Meta-Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价新辅助化疗对晚期卵巢癌患者手术及预后的影响,探讨新辅助化疗在晚期卵巢癌中的应用。方法:计算机检索Pubmed、Cochrane Library、Embase,检索时限为1990年1月1日至2014年8月31日,纳入新辅助化疗后行间歇型肿瘤细胞减灭术与初始肿瘤细胞减灭术相比较的随机对照实验或观察性研究。结果:最终纳入20个研究,共3827例患者。Meta分析结果示:新辅助化疗后间歇型肿瘤细胞减灭术满意缩瘤术率(75.1%)高于初始肿瘤细胞减灭术(59.7%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.00001);两组无进展生存期分别为15.2月、13.0月,总生存期分别为33.2月、38.7月,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:新辅助化疗可以显著提高晚期卵巢癌患者肿瘤细胞减灭术满意缩瘤术的几率,但不改善无进展生存期与总生存期。 Objective:To evaluate the influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgery and prognosis in pa- tients with advanced ovarian cancer and investigate the application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer. Methods :We searched pubmed, Cochrane Library and Embase database from January 1,1990 to August 31,2014. The randomized controlled trials and observed studies were included,and meta-analysis was processed by Revman 5.3. Results :Totally 20 articles involving 3827 patients were included. The percentage of optimal debulking surgery was statistically significantly higher in neoadjuvant chemotherapy than in primary sur- gery(75. 1% vs 59. 7%, P 〈0. 00001 ). No difference was observed in progression-free survival(15.2 months vs 13.0 months,P〉0.05) nor overall survival(33. 2 months versus 38. 7 months, P〉0. 05) between two groups. Conclusions.The current meta-analysis showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased the opportunity of optimal debulking surgery and provided equal survival compared with primary debulking surgery.
出处 《实用妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第7期530-534,共5页 Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 新辅助化疗 卵巢癌 肿瘤细胞减灭术 生存期 META分析 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Ovarian cancer Debulking surgery Survival Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献22

  • 1Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, et al. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta- analysis. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1248-59.
  • 2Gallo A, Frigerio L. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical considerations in ovarian cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003;15:25-31.
  • 3McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady ME et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage Ⅲ and stage Ⅳ ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1-6.
  • 4Kuhn W, Rutke S, Spathe K, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by tumor debulking prolongs survival for patients with poor prognosis in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage ⅢC ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 2001;92:2585-91.
  • 5Morice P, Dubernard G, Rey A, et al. Results of interval debulking surgery compared with primary debulking surgery in advanced stage ovarian cancer. J Am Coil Surg 2003;197:955-63.
  • 6Vergote I, De Wever I, Tjalma W, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary debulldng surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 285 patients Gynecol Oncol 1998;71:431-6.
  • 7Loizzi V, Cormio G, Resta L, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: a case-control study. IntJ Gynecol Cancer 2005;15:217-23.
  • 8Kang S, Nam BH. Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy increase opdmal cytoreduction rate in advanced ovarian cancer? Meta-analysis of 21 studies. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:2315-20.
  • 9Vergote I, Trope CG, Amant F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage ⅢC or Ⅳ ovarian cancer. N EnglJ Med 2010;363:943-53.
  • 10Vergote I, Rustin GJ, Eisenhauer EA, et al. Ke: new guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors [ovarian cancer]. Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1534-5.

共引文献10

同被引文献59

引证文献6

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部