剽窃和改编认定的司法实践反思——由琼瑶诉于正案谈起

Rethink the Definition of Plagiarism and Adaptation in the Judicial Practice in the Case between Qiongyao and Yuzheng

在立法和学理上,剽窃和侵害改编权是两个独立的著作权侵权行为,但是在司法实践中常基于功利性考虑导致二者的区分出现混乱,以致"剽窃"裁判落空,"改编"裁判盛行;同时,司法实践中的混乱又反过来扰乱了立法、释法和法学理论的现有研究。因此,应当通过修改法律或者解释法律并结合学理研究来重新明确二者的界限,从而实现立法与司法、学理与实践上的协调统一。

On the legislation and legal theory,plagiarism and encroaching on adaption right are two independent copyright infringement.However,in the judicial practice,it so often leads to the chaos between them owing to the utilitarian thoughts that the judgments about plagiarism reducing while the ones about adaption right increasing.In turn,the chaos in the judicial practice disrupt the ongoing legislation,the interpretation of law and legal research.Therefore,the boundary between plagiarism and encroaching on adaption right should be redefine through modifying or interpreting the law while combining the legal theory research,in order to realize the coordinating and unifying between them.