期刊文献+

基于系统水平的湖泊流域生态风险评估 被引量:9

Ecological Risk Assessment in a Lake Watershed Based on Ecosystem Level
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为实现流域范围内的生态环境管理和生态风险控制,在生态风险评估框架基础上,基于相对风险模型构建了系统水平的湖泊流域生态风险评估模型.模型分析了社会经济系统与生态系统的耦合方式,将生态系统整体作为风险受体、生态系统服务作为评估终点,通过风险组分及其关系的分析量化实现了区域相对生态风险水平的表征,并以太湖流域上游区域为例进行了试算.结果表明:研究区内无锡-江阴区域(沿江水系)生态风险最高,溧阳-宜兴、常州-金坛、湖州-德清和长兴-安吉区域风险值分别为无锡-江阴区域的73.2%、78.8%、74.4%和59.9%;长兴-安吉区域(西苕溪水系)生态风险最低.不同区域风险主要来源不同,湖州-德清区域主要受水利设施影响,长兴-安吉区域各风险源贡献率较为均衡,其他区域主要风险源为工业、种植业和水产养殖业,其风险贡献率分别为13%~18%、12%~19%和8%~15%;研究区域内,水产品、水质净化等生态系统服务的产出受到较大影响. In order to perform ecological environment management and control of ecological risk in a basin,an ecological risk assessment( ERA) model of a lake basin was built on the basis of ERA frameworks and relative risk model( RRM). By analyzing mutual coupling effects between the socio-economic and ecological systems,and regarding ecological services as the endpoints and ecosystem as the risk receptor,the regional relative ecological risk was characterized by describing and quantifying the risk components and their relationships.This model was applied in the upstream Taihu Lake Watershed. The results showed that Wuxi-Jiangyin and Changxing-Anji regions exhibited the highest and the lowest ecological risks,respectively. Liyang-Yixing,Changzhou-Jintan,Huzhou-Deqing,and ChangxingAnji regions yielded 73. 2%,78. 8%,74. 4% and 59. 9% of the highest ecological risk,respectively. The main risk sources of each region were different. Huzhou-Deqing area was mainly affected by water conservancy establishment,while the contribution rate of every risk source was relatively balanced in the Anji-Changxing area. In other areas,the effects of industries,agriculture and aquaculture as risk sources were severe,with risk contribution rates being 13%-18%,12%-19% and 8%-15% respectively. Thus,ecological services of aquatic products biomass and water purification ability were mainly affected.
出处 《环境科学研究》 EI CAS CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第7期1122-1129,共8页 Research of Environmental Sciences
基金 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2012ZX07503)
关键词 湖泊生态系统 系统水平 生态风险 太湖流域 生态系统服务 相对风险模型 lake ecosystem ecosystem-level ecological risk Taihu Lake Watershed ecosystem services relative risk model
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1CORMIER S M, SMITH M, NORTON S,et al. Assessing ecological risk in watersheds:a case study of problem formulation in the Big Darby Creek Watershed, Ohio, USA [ J ]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry ,2000,19 ( 4 ) : 1082-1096.
  • 2WALKER R,LANDIS W, BROWN P, et al. Developing a regional ecological risk assessment:a case study of a tasmanian agricultural catchment[ J ]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2001,7 (2) :417-439.
  • 3LANDIS W G. Twenty years before and hence: ecological risk assessment at multiple scales with multiple stressors and multiple endpoints [J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2003,9 (5) :1317-1326.
  • 4HAKANSON L. An ecological risk index for acquatic pollution control, a sedimentological approach [ J ]. Water Research, 1980,14 (8) :975-1001.
  • 5AYRE K K, LANDIS W G. A bayesian approach to landscape ecological risk assessment applied to the Upper Grande Ronde Watershed, Oregon [ J ]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessmen, 2012,18 (5) :946-970.
  • 6MALEKMOHAMMADI B, BLOUCHI L R. Ecological risk assessment of wetland ecosystems using multi criteria decision making and geographic information system [ J ]. Ecological Indicators ,2014,41 : 133-144.
  • 7LANDIS W G. Regional scale ecological risk assessment: using the relative risk model[ M ]. London : CRC Press,2004.
  • 8武江越,刘征涛,冯流,周俊丽,高富.太湖表层沉积物中PAHs的空间分布及风险评价[J].环境科学研究,2012,25(4):391-396. 被引量:10
  • 9张亚辉,曹莹,李霁,雷昌文,刘征涛.我国主要河流中3种氯酚混合物的生态风险评价[J].环境科学研究,2012,25(4):385-390. 被引量:9
  • 10金相灿,王圣瑞,席海燕.湖泊生态安全及其评估方法框架[J].环境科学研究,2012,25(4):357-362. 被引量:46

二级参考文献166

共引文献351

同被引文献128

引证文献9

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部