气压循环治疗仪治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的疗效观察

Observation on Efficacy of Pneumatic Circulation Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

目的 观察气压循环治疗仪对糖尿病周围神经病变（DPN）的疗效。方法 选取2012年10月至2013年3月在兰州大学第二医院糖尿病2科住院的糖尿病周围神经病变患者120例,采用随机数字法将患者随机分为常规治疗组和气压治疗组,每组60例。常规治疗组给予降糖、改善循环等治疗,气压治疗组为在常规治疗组基础上加用气压循环治疗仪物理治疗,两组疗程均为10~14 d。比较两组患者治疗前后感觉阈值振动检测仪测定的数值变化。结果 治疗后气压治疗组DPN情况显著优于常规治疗组（P〈0.05）。常规治疗组15例缓解,缓解率25.0%,气压治疗组32例缓解,缓解率53.3%,常规治疗组缓解率显著低于气压治疗组（P〈0.05）。结论 在常规治疗基础上联合气压循环物理治疗对DPN患者效果显著,且在治疗过程中,患者无明显不良反应。

Objective To observe the atmospheric circulation treatment effect for diabetic peripheral neuropathy（ DPN） .Methods A total of 120 DPN patients were selected in the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University from Oct.2012 to Mar.2013,and they were divided into pneumatic circulation treatment group and conventional treatment group by random number method,60 patients each.The conventional treatment group was given routine therapy,while the pneumatic circulation treatment group was added the air circulation mas-sage therapy.The course of treatment was 10-14 days.Changes measured by sensory threshold vibration detector of the two groups were compared before and after treatment.Results DPN condition of the pneu-matic circulation treatment group was significantly better than the conventional treatment group （P 〈0.05） after treatment,there were 15 cases （25.0%） of remission in the conventional treatment group,while there were 32 cases （53.3%） of remission in the pneumatic circulation treatment group ,and the remission rate of the conventional treatment group was significantly lower than the pneumatic circulation treatment group （ P〈0.05）.Conclusion Pneumatic circulation combined with conventional treatment has significant effect on patients with DPN,and there is no obvious adverse reaction during the treatment.