期刊文献+

反思新凯恩斯主义劳动力市场理论:收入分配真的无关紧要吗?——一个包含资本家和工人的NK-DSGE框架 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于受阶级局限性所限,以Blanchard和Galí(2010)为代表的新凯恩斯主义劳动力市场理论认为收入分配无关紧要,进而掩盖了剥削的事实。引入收入分配,可建立一个包含资本家家庭和工人家庭的内含收入分配的新凯恩斯主义动态随机一般均衡模型,并基于这一模型考察收入分配的重要性。外生冲击下消费的脉冲响应表明,资本家消费的上升以牺牲工人的消费为前提。偏好冲击的脉冲响应函数表明,收入分配的引入较好地刻画了工人在面临较低实际工资时仍不得不增加劳动力供给和遭遇非自愿失业的事实;而技术冲击和货币政策冲击的脉冲响应函数表明,忽略收入分配的研究夸大了外生冲击对于劳动力市场的影响,因而基于已有的研究所进行的政策评估也夸大了货币政策的效应。
作者 陈利锋
出处 《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期92-101,共10页 Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"城镇间真实差距与我国城镇化研究"(13BJL056) 广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划学科共建项目"劳动力市场结构性改革与中国经济波动研究--基于动态新凯恩斯主义的视角"(GD14XYJ02)
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1F. Ravenna, E. C. Walsh. Screening and Labor Market Flows in a Model with Heterogeneous Workers. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2012, 44 (S2) : 31-71.
  • 2J. Gait, J. D. L6pez- Salido, J. Valles. Understanding the Effects of Government Spending on Consumption. Journal of the European Economics Association, 2007, 5(1):227-270.
  • 3J. Gali. Unemployment Fluctuations and Stabilization Policies : A New Keynesian Perspective. Cambridge : The MIT Press, 2010: 21-22.
  • 4F. Smets, R. Wouters. Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycle: A Bayesian DSGE Approach. American Economic Review, 2007, 97(3) : 586——606.
  • 5陈利锋.异质性雇佣成本、劳动力流动与失业的持续性[J].浙江社会科学,2015(4):4-16. 被引量:5
  • 6Christiano J. Lawrance, M. Eichenbaum, Mathias Tra- bandt. Unemployment and Business Cycles. NBER Working Papers, 2013, No. w19265.
  • 7O. Blanchard, J. Gali. Labor Markets and Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Model with Unemployment. American Economic Journal : Macroeconomics, 2010, 2 ( 2 ) : 1-30.
  • 8F. Ravenna, E. C. Walsh. Welfare -Based Optimal Monetary Policy with Unemployment and Sticky Prices: A Linear- Quadratic Framework. American E- conomic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2011, 3 (2) : 130-162.
  • 9J. Gall, J. D. L6pez-Salido, J. Valles. Understand- ing the Effects of Government Spending on Consumption. Journal of the European Economics Association, 2007, 5 ( 1 ) : 227-270.
  • 10M. Woodford. Firm -Specific Capital and the New Keynesian Phillips Curve. International Journal of Cen- tral Banking, 2005, 1(2): 1-46.

二级参考文献132

共引文献155

同被引文献40

  • 1Gali J. Technology, employment, and the business cy- cle : Do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations [J]. A- merican Economic Review, 1999,89 ( 1 ) : 249-271.
  • 2Basu S., Fernald J G., Kimball M S.Are technology im- provements contractionary [J]. American Economic Review, 2006,96(5) : 1418-1448. .
  • 3Ravenna F., Walsh C E.Vacancies, unemployment, and Phillips curve [J]. European Economic Review, 2008,52 ( 8 ) : 1494-1521.
  • 4Gal J., Smets F.,Wouters R.Slow recoveries : A struc- tural interpretation [J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2012,44 (2) : 9-30.
  • 5Christiano L., Eichenbaum M., Vigfusson R.J. How do Canadian hours worked respond to a technology shock [R].Board of Gonernors of the Reserve System, International Finance Dis- cussion Papers,2003, No.774.
  • 6Christiano L., Eichenbaum M., Vigfusson R.J. What happens after a technology shock? [R] .NBER Working Papers, 2003, No.w9819.
  • 7Alexopoulos M.Extra! Extra! Some positive technology shocks are expansionary ! [J].Economic Letters,2008,101 (3) : 153-156.
  • 8Christiano L., Eichenbaum M., Vigfusson R.J.The re- sponse of hours to a technology shock : Evidence based on direct measures of technology [R]. NBER Working Papers, 2004, No. w10254.
  • 9Liu Z., Phaneuf L. The transmission of productivity shocks: What do we learn about DSGE modeling [J]. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 2013,109/110: 283-304.
  • 10Fisher J.D.M.The dynamic effects of neutral and in- vestment-specific technology shocks[J].Journal of Political E- conomy,2006, 114(3) : 413-451.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部