期刊文献+

金砖四国在全球价值链中的参与模式和经济利益的比较分析 被引量:8

Participation Mode and Economic Benefit of the BRIC Countries in the Global Value Chain
原文传递
导出
摘要 全球价值链已经成为当代国际分工和国际贸易的显著特征。20世纪90年代以后,金砖四国参与全球价值链的程度在日益加深。金砖四国在全球价值链中选择了不同的前后向价值链参与特征、行业参与结构模式和行业技术层级参与模式,但是金砖四国却都获得了贸易收入的倍增效应、经济增长促进效应、就业促进效应、产业成长促进效应。金砖四国的经验表明,参与全球价值链没有最优模式,只要发挥本国比较优势,都能够从中获利。但当前金砖四国在全球价值链中还处于初级发展阶段,提升在全球价值链中的贸易利益,规避风险,是金转四国今后主要的发展导向和政策重点。 Global value chain (GVC) has become a remarkable feature in the contemporary international division of labor and international trade. Since 1990s, the BRIC countries have been participating in the GVC deeply. Although they chose greatly different modes to join the GVC, ranging from the backward or foreword value chains to four different industry models and different technology levels of industries embedded in the GVC, they have acquired multiplier trade incomes, and a higher growth of economy, employment and industry. The BRIC' experience has shown that there is no optimal participation mode in the GVC. As long as one country plays its full comparative advantage, it will profit from it. Considering that they are still in the early stage of development in the GVC, their development direction and emphasis of policy in the future should be designed to enhance trade interests in the global value chain and to avoid risks.
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第7期4-18,41,共16页 International Economics and Trade Research
基金 第55批博士后科学基金(2014N550671)
关键词 金砖四国 全球价值链参与模式 全球价值链利益 附加值贸易 BRIC the participation mode of the GVC gains from the GVC value-added trade
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献44

  • 1李稻葵,李丹宁.中美贸易顺差:根本原因在哪里?[J].国际经济评论,2006(5):13-16. 被引量:84
  • 2李晓钟,张小蒂.我国得自外商直接投资的比较利益分析[J].国际贸易问题,2006(11):97-101. 被引量:10
  • 3蒲华林,张捷.产品内分工与中美结构性贸易顺差[J].世界经济研究,2007(2):29-35. 被引量:30
  • 4杨海余,黄廷.中美制造业的产品内贸易条件分析[J].财经理论与实践,2007,28(4):65-68. 被引量:5
  • 5Chao, L , L. Luk, and A. Back. 2009. Sales of iPhone in China Set Under 3 -Year Accord. Wall Street Journal. 31 August. hnp://online, wsj. com/article/SB 125144884553566179. html (Accessed 13 March 2010).
  • 6Hesseldahl, A. 2008. Tearing Down the iPhone 3G. Business Week. 15 July. http ://www. businessweek, eom/technology/content/ju12008/tc20080714 070565. htm (Accessed 11 March 2010).
  • 7Hughes, N. 2010. Piper: 15.8M US iPhone sales in 2010, even without Verizon. Applelnsider. 6 January. http://www. appleinsider, com/articles/10/01/06/piper 15_8m us_iphone_sales_in__2010_even_without_verizon, html (Accessed 10 March 2010).
  • 8Thorbecke, W. 2010. Investigating the Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on the People's Republic of China's Processed Exports. ADBI Working Paper No. 202. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.
  • 9Rassweiler, A. 2009. iPhone 3G S Carries 178.96 BOM and Manufacturing Cost, iSuppli Teardown Reveals. iSuppli. 24 June. http ://www. isuppli, corn/Teardowns-Manufacturing-and-Pricing/News/Pages/iPhone-3G-S-Carries-178-96-BOM-and-Manufacturing-Cost-iSuppli-Teardown-Reveals. aspx ( Accessed 11 March 2010).
  • 10Lardy, Nicholas R. China in the World Economy [ J]. Institute for International Studies,1994.

共引文献111

同被引文献73

引证文献8

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部