期刊文献+

水稻单基因系与稻瘟病菌互作中防卫相关基因的表达 被引量:1

Defense Genes Expression of Disease Resistance to Blast Fungus in Monogenic Lines
下载PDF
导出
摘要 稻瘟病是危害水稻最严重的真菌病害之一。文章利用稻瘟病菌株J32-6和水稻品种(LTH、J6、J27)构成不同亲和的互作关系,分析了在互作中水稻信号传导途径关键酶合成基因和4个防御反应病程相关蛋白基因的诱导表达。结果表明,稻瘟病菌J32-6诱导了亲和与非亲和互作中水稻Os LOX、Os AOS和Os PAL酶合成基因的表达,表明在与J32-6互作中水稻品种(系)LTH、J6和J27启动了茉莉酸和水杨酸防御反应信号传导途径。在非亲和的互作反应中,稻瘟病菌能不同程度地诱导水稻Os PR1a、OsPR1b、Os PR3-1和Os PR4基因的表达,从而有效激活了防御反应系统,使水稻品种J6和J27表现为抗病;而在亲和的互作反应中,多数Os PR基因的表达水平低、时间短或没有表达,水稻品种LTH表现为感病。 Rice blast is one of the most serious disease of rice. The induced expressions of key enzyme genes of plant signaling pathway and four pathogenesls-related ptolein genes were analyzed in rice leaves by using three rice varieties (LTH, J6 and J27) and one special blast i- solate (J32-6). The results showed that OsLOX, OsAOS and OsPAL were induced by isolate compatible and incompatible interactions. Jas- monate and salicylate dependent defense signaling pathways were activated. OsPRIa, OsPR1b, OsPR3-1 and OsPR4 were expressed for lon- ger time in the leaves ef incompatible rice plants, so J6 and J27 exhibited disease resistance. While most of OsPR were expressed for lower, short time or non expresoion in the leaves of compatible rice plants, so LTH was susceptible to rice blast.
出处 《西南农业学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期1078-1082,共5页 Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金(31160355) 云南省自然科学基金(2010ZC173)
关键词 稻瘟病菌 水稻 防御反应基因 信号途径 诱导表达 Magnaporthe oryzae Rice Defense gene Signaling pathways Induced expression
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Talbot N J. On the trail of a cereal killer: Exploring the biology ofMagnapon/w gt/sa3[ J]. Annu Rev Microbiol, 2003, 57:177 -202.,.
  • 2Dean B A, Talbot N J, Ebbole D J, et al. The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe [ J ]. Nature, 2005, 434 : 980 -986.
  • 3Schailer F. Enzymes of the biosynthesis of octade-canoid-derived sig- naling molecules[J]. Jourmd of Experimental Botmy, 2001, 52:11 -23.
  • 4Creelman R A, Mullet J E. Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants[J]. Annual Review of P]ant Physiology, 1997, 48:355 - 382.
  • 5Dixon R A, Achine L, Kota P, et al. The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant ddence-a genomlcs ve [ J ]. Molecular Plant Pa- thology, 2002(3) :371 -390.
  • 6Yang Y N, Qi M, Mei C S. Endogenous salicylic acid protects rice plants fi'om oxidative damage caused by aging as well as biotic and abiotic stress[J]. The Plant Journal, 2004, 40:909 -919.
  • 7Agruwal C K, Rakwal R, Jwa N S, et al. Effects of signaling, pro- tein phoephatase inlfibitors and blast pathogen ( Oryza sat/m L. ) phespliolipids hydroperoxide g]utathione peroxidase ( OsPHGPX ) gene in seedling leaves[ J]. C, ene, 2002, 283:27-236.
  • 8Howard R J, Fenmi M A, Roach D H, ct ed. Penetration of hard subetrates by a fungus employing enormous turgur pressures [ J ]. PNAS, 1991, 88:11281-11284.
  • 9Kankanala P, Czymmek K, Valent B. Ro].es for rice membrane dy- namice and plasmodesmata during biotrophic invasion by the blast fungus[ J]. Plant Cell, 2007, 19:706 -724.
  • 10Caracuel-Rios Z, Talbot N J. Cellular ditTenntiafion and host inva- sion by the rice blast fungus Magnaponh gr/sea[J]. Curr Opin Mi- crobiol, 2007, 10:339-345.

二级参考文献37

  • 1HUDGINS J W,CHRISTIANSEN E ,FRANCESCHI V R. Induction of ana- tomically based defense responses in stems of diverse conifers by methyl jasmonate : a phylogenetic perspective [ J ]. Tree Physiology,2004,24 ( 3 ) : 251 -264.
  • 2ROSNER S ,FUHRER E. The significance of lenticels for successful Pityo- genes chalcographus ( Coleoptera: Scolytidae ) invasion of Norway spruce trees [Picea abies(Pinaceae) [J]. Trees,2002,16(7) :497 -503.
  • 3HUDGINS J W,CHRISTIANSEN E ,FRANCESCHI V R. Methyl jasmonate induces changes mimicking anatomical defenses in diverse members of the Pinaceae [J]. Tree Physiology,2003,23(6) :361 -371.
  • 4FRANCESCHI V,KREKL1NG T,BERRYMAN A,et al. Specialized phloem parenchyma ceils in Norway spruce(Pinaceae)bark are an important site of defense reactions [J]. American Journal of Botany, 1998,85 ( 5 ) : 601 - ill5.
  • 5NAGY N E,FOSSDAL C G, KROKENE P,et al. Induced responses to pathogen i~rfection in Norway spruce phloem:changes in polyphenolic pa- renchynm cells ,chalcone synthase transcript levels and peroxidase activity [J]. Tree Physiology,2004,24(5) :505 -515.
  • 6KREKLING T,FRANCESCHI V R,BERRYMAN A A,et al. The structure and development of polyphenolic parenchyma cells in Norway spruce ( P/- cea abies)bark [J]. Flora,2000,195(4) :354 -369.
  • 7KROKENE P,SOLHEIM H,KREKLING T,et al. Inducible anatomical de- fense responses in Norway spruce sterns and their possible role in induced resistance [J]. Tree Physiology,2003,23(3) :191 - 197.
  • 8HEIJARI J, KAINULAINEN, VIIRI H, et al. Application of methyl jas- monate reduces growth but increases chemical defence and resistance a- gainst Hylobius abietis in Scots pine seedlings [J ]. Entomologia Experi- mentalis et Applicata,2005,115 (1) : 117 - 124.
  • 9MCKAY S A B, HUNTER W L, GODARD K A, et al. Insect attack and wounding induce traumatic resin duct development and gene expression of (-) -pinene synthase in Sitka spruce [J]. Plant Physiology,2003,133( I ) : 368 - 378.
  • 10NAGY N E, FRANCESCHI V R, SOLHEIM H, et al. Wound-induced traumatic resin duct development in stems of Norway spruce(Pinaceae) : anatomy and cytochemical traits [J]. American Journal of Botany,2000, 87(3) :302 -313.

共引文献4

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部