外语写长法在QQ空间的应用模式研究——与传统写长法之比较被引量：10

The Application of Length Approach in QQ Zone: In Comparison with the Traditional Length Approach

导出

摘要本研究考察外语写长法在QQ空间的应用模式及其效果.并将其与传统写长法进行比较。研究对象为非英语专业一年级两个班级124名学生,分别实施QQ空间外语写长法训练(实验组)和正常课堂上外语写长法训练(对照组)。研究结果显示,QQ空间英语写长法和正常课堂上的英语写长法训练对学生的写作能力均有积极的影响,但QQ空间英语写长法在提高学生的学习自信心和学习动机方面优于传统课堂外语写长法,实验组整体英语水平的提高程度亦高于对照组。但是在提高学生的自主学习能力方面,两种写长法训练之间没有明显差异。该研究结果对外语写长法在网络环境下的应用具有指导和启示意义。 This paper aims to explore the application model of length approach in QQ zone and tries to compare its effects with traditional length approach carded out in the classroom. The subjects were 124 freshmen of non-Eng- lish majors from two classes who were divided into two groups-one target group using length approach in QQ zone and one control group with the same approach in regular classroom. The results show that both approaches have positive effects in improving learners＇ writing ability. However, the length approach in the QQ zone is superior in increasing learners＇ motivation and self-confidence. And the target group gained higher language proficiency as compared to that in the control group. The two approa- ches show no differences in promoting learner autonomy. The study can be of some significance in guiding the ap- plication of net-based length approach.

作者张秀芹杨莉张宇

机构地区燕山大学外国语学院

出处《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期57-62,共6页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

基金全国教育科学"十一五"规划2010年度教育部重点课题"基于CDIO理念的大学外语教学模式的改革与实践"(项目编号:GPA105051)的阶段性成果

关键词写长法 QQ空间学习动机学习自信心写作能力 length approach QQ zone motivation self-confidence writing ability

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献26

1Ackerman,J. 1993. The promise of writing to learn[J]. Writ- ten Communication, ( 3 ) :334 - 370.
2Beauvois, M. 1995. E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in com- puter-assisted classroom discussion [ J ]. Computers and the Humanities, ( 3 ) : 177 - 190.
3Candy, P. 1988. On the attainment of subject-matter autonomy [ A ]. In D. Boud (ed.). Developing Student Autonomy in Leaming[ C]. New York:Kogan Page.
4G-e, Z. 2011, Exploring E-learners' perception of net-based peer-reviewed English writing [ J ]. Computer Supported Col- laborative Learning, (6) :75 - 91.
5Jeffrey,J. & G. Underwood. 1996. Writing as problem-solving: The role of concrete and abstract knowledge in the production of written text [ A ]. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Bergh & M. Couzjin. (eds.). Theories,Models and Methodology in Writing Research [ C ]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
6Lai, C. & Y. Zhao. 2006, Noticing and text-based chat [ J ]. Language Learning and Technology, (3) :102 -120.
7Langer, J. 1986. Learning through writing:Study skills in the content areas [ J]. Journal of Reading, ( 29 ) :400 - 406.
8Nelson, N. 2001, Writing to learn [ A ]. In P. Tynjili, L. Ma- son & K. Lonka (eds). Writing as a Learning Tool[ C ]. Dor- drecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9Newell, C. 1984. Learning from writing in two content areas: A case study/protocol analysis[ J]. Research in the Teaching of English, ( 18 ) :265 - 287.
10Penrose, A. 1992. To write or not to write: Effects of task and task interpretation on learning through writing [ J ]. Writ- ten Communication, (9) :465 - 500.