期刊文献+

宫颈癌初始治疗后腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移调强放疗的临床观察 被引量:9

Clinical analysis of intensity modulated radiation therapy in cervical cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis after initial treatment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 对比单纯调强放疗(IMRT)与IMRT同步TP方案化疗治疗宫颈癌初始治疗后腹主动脉旁淋巴结(PALN)转移的疗效和不良反应.方法 选取2008年10月至2013年8月宫颈癌初始治疗后出现PALN转移的56例患者,PALN转移病灶给予放疗剂量GTV 55~60 Gy,CTV45 ~ 50 Gy,共25 ~ 30次,5~6周,接受同步放化疗(CRT组)者36例,单纯放疗(RT组)者20例.CRT组的同步化疗方案为TP方案,第1天紫杉醇135 mg/m2,顺铂60 mg/m2 2 d,21 d重复.单纯PALN转移(iPALN)患者33例,合并其他部位复发转移(niPALN)患者23例.结果 中位随访时间22.7个月(2.7 ~74.4个月).98.2%(55/56)的患者完成了放疗,CRT组中,38.9%的患者完成化疗2~3个周期,61.1%的患者完成化疗1个周期.CRT和RT组的有效率(CR +PR)分别为91.7%(33/36)和85% (17/20)(x2=0.516,P>0.05).两组患者的中位总生存(OS)时间为38和23个月,3年OS率分别为57.5%和32.7% (x2 =4.059,P<0.05),中位无进展生存时间(PFS)为68.3和16个月,3年PFS率分别为50.4%和29.2%(x2=4.184,P<0.05).单纯PALN转移(iPALN)(33例)患者与合并其他部位复发转移(niPALN)患者(23例)的中位OS分别为71.2和21.4个月,3年OS率分别为53%和39.5%(x2=4.265,P< 0.05).CRT和RT组出现3或4级白细胞低下的患者分别为10例(27.8%)和6例(30%),3级消化道反应各有1例,差异均无统计学意义(x2=0.693、0.847,P> 0.05).结论 IMRT同步TP化疗对PALN转移的患者近期效果和远期生存均优于单纯放疗的患者,且不良反应可耐受. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with or without concurrent chemotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastases after initial treatment.Methods From Oct 2008 to Aug 2013,56 cervical cancer patients with PALN metastases after initial treatment,including radical resection or pelvic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy,were selected for analysis.The delivered radiation dose to PALN was 55-60 Gy for GTV and 45-50 Gy for CTV respectively with 25-30 fractions during 5-6 weeks.36 patients received concurrent paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) chemoradiotherapy (CRT group) and 20 patients received RT alone (RT group).Results The median follow-up time after treatment was 22.7 months (2.7 to 74.4 months).98.2% (55/56) of patients completed RT.In CRT group,38.9% underwent concurrent TP regimen 2-3 cycles and the rest completed one cycle.The rates of CR plus PR in CRT and RT groups were 91.7% (33/36) and 85% (17/20),respectively (x2 =0.516,P 〉0.05).The 3-year overall survival rate in CRT group and RT group were 57.5% and 32.7% (x2 =4.059,P 〈 0.05),and 3-year progression-free survival rates were 50.4% and 29.2% (x2 =4.184,P 〈 0.05),respectively.TP regimen concurrent chemoradiotherapy was more effective than radiotherapy alone.The 3-year overall survival rate was 53% and 39.5% in patients with isolated PALN and nonisolated PALN,respectively (x2 =4.265,P 〈 0.05).Grade 3 or 4 acute leukopenia was found in 10 (27.8%,CRT group) and 6 (30%,RT group) patients (x2 =0.693,P 〉 0.05).Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 1 patient each group (x2 =0.847,P 〉 0.05).Conclusions TP regimen concurrent CRT is associated with better survival than RT alone,and the treatment toxicities could be tolerant.
出处 《中华放射医学与防护杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第7期522-527,共6页 Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
关键词 宫颈癌 腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移 调强放疗 TP方案化疗 Cervical cancer Para-aortic lymph node metastases Intensity modulated radiation therapy TP regimen chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer statistics, 2014[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2014,64(1) :9-29.
  • 2Sakurai H, Mitsuhashi N, Takahashi M, et al. Analysis of recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiation therapy alone: patterns of recurrence, latent periods, and prognosis[ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2001, 50(5) :1136-1144.
  • 3Niibe Y, Kenjo M, Kazumoto T, et al. Multi-institutional study of radiation therapy for isolated para-aortie lymph node recurrence in uterine cervical carcinoma: 84 subjects of a population of more than5,000[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006,66(5): 1366-1369.
  • 4Hong JH, Tsai CS, Lai CH, et al. Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of cervix after definitive radiotherapy[ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004,60( 1 ) :249-257.
  • 5Liu SP, Huang X, Ke GH, et al. 3D radiation therapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy for recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer: the Shanghai Cancer Hospital experience [J]. PLoS One, 2012,7 :e40299.
  • 6Ahmed RS, Kim RY, Duan J, et al. IMRT dose escalation for positive para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer while reducing dose to bone marrow and other organs at risk[ J]. Int J Radiat Onco| Biol Phys, 2004,60 (2): 505 -51-2.
  • 7Singh AK, Grigsby PW, Rader JS, et al. Cervix carcinoma, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and salvage of isolated paraaortic lymph node recurrence[ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005, 61 (2) :450-455.
  • 8Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, et al. (2003) CTCAE v3.0: Development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment [ J ]. Semin Radiat Oncol, 2013,13 (3) :176-181.
  • 9Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline ( version 1. 1 ) [ J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009,45 (2) :228-247.
  • 10Niibe Y, Kazumoto T, Toita T, et al. Frequency and characteristics of isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma in Japan: a multi- institutional study [ J ]. Gynecologic Oncol, 2006, 103 ( 2 ) : 435-438.

二级参考文献28

  • 1房辉,李晔雄.前列腺癌的适形和调强适形放疗[J].癌症进展,2005,3(5):449-460. 被引量:10
  • 2张秀珍,付玉兰,赵西侠,杨栓雀,孙萍.宫颈癌盆腔淋巴结转移情况分析[J].现代肿瘤医学,2005,13(2):232-234. 被引量:5
  • 3冯淑瑜,张彦娜,刘建刚.宫颈癌淋巴结转移的高危因素及预后分析[J].癌症,2005,24(10):1261-1266. 被引量:71
  • 4马绍康,高菊珍,吴令英,王亚菲,张宏志,黄曼妮.宫颈癌复发肿瘤适形照射联合化疗30例临床观察[J].中国肿瘤临床,2006,33(2):96-98. 被引量:25
  • 5Querleu D,Dargent D,Ansquer Y,et al.Extraperitoneal endosurgical aortic and common iliac dissection in the staging of bulky or advanced cervical carcinomas[J].Cancer,2000,88(8):1883-1891.
  • 6Berman ML,Keys H,Creasman W,et al.Survival and patterns of recurrence in cervical cancer metastatic to periaortic lymph nodes (a Gynecologic Oncology Group study)[J].Gynecol Oncol,1984,19(1):8-16.
  • 7Benedetti-Panici P,Maneschi F,Scambia G,et al.Lymphatic spread of cervical cancer:an anatomical and pathological study based on 225 radical hysterectomies with systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy[J].Gynecol Oncol,1996,62(1):19-24.
  • 8Huang EY,Wang CJ,Chen HC,et al.Multivariate analysis of para-aortic lymph node recurrence after definitive radiotherapy for stage IB-IVA squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2008,72(3):834-842.
  • 9刘炽明,吴令英.子宫颈浸润癌的诊断、分期及影响预后因素[M]//连利娟.林巧稚妇科肿瘤学.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.342-355.
  • 10Takeshima N,Hirai Y,Katase K,et al.The value of squamous cell carcinoma antigen as a predictor of nodal metastasis in cervical cancer[J].Gynecol Oncol,1998,68(3):263-266.

共引文献7

同被引文献118

引证文献9

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部