期刊文献+

T1b期肾癌患者肾部分切除和肾癌根治术预后比较的Meta分析 被引量:6

Comparison of partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for T1brenal cell carcinoma:ameta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较T1b期肾癌患者行肾部分切除术(PN)和肾癌根治术(RN)的疗效和预后差异,为临床选择手术方式提供循证依据。方法检索Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane library、CNKI中文期刊全文数据库,以Radical nephrectomy(肾癌根治术),Partial nephrectomy(肾部分切除术)、Renal cell carcinoma(肾细胞癌)、T1bN0M0为检索词,收集国内外公开发表的关于肾癌患者肾部分切除和肾癌根治术的临床对照研究。结果共纳入文献8篇,涉及61 826例患者。比较两种手术方式术后的复发、转移、5年死亡率、5年肿瘤特异性生存率的比值比(OR)分别为5.44(95%CI 1.34-22.06)、0.39(95%CI 0.18-0.83)、0.87(95%CI0.32-2.36)、0.52(95%CI0.05-5.88),术后血肌酐和肾小球滤过率(GFR)均值差(MD)分别为-11.63(95%CI-24.58-1.32)、6.75(95%CI-0.55-14.06),2种手术方式在术后死亡率、术后肿瘤特异性死亡率、术后GFR和术后血肌酐的差异无统计学意义。PN术后肿瘤复发的发生率高于RN。PN术后肿瘤远处转移的发生率少于RN。结论两种手术方式,在术后患者的5年总体死亡率、5年肿瘤特异性生存率、术后血肌酐和GFR均无差异。而术后的肿瘤的复发,RN组优于PN组,然而远处转移侧相反。但是由于肾部分切除术最大限度地保留了残余肾单位,在保证肿瘤治疗效果的同时,尽可能地保留了患肾功能,因此对T1b期肾癌,PN是一种安全可靠的治疗方式。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of partial nephrectomy(PN)and radical nephrectomy(RN)in the treatment of T1 b renal cell carcinoma.Methods Relevant studies about surgical treatment of T1 b renal cell carcinoma included in databases including Medline,Cochrane library and CNKI were retrieved with key words"radical nephrectomy","partial nephrectomy","renal cell carcinoma",and"T1bN0M0".Results A total of 8 trials were collected,and61 826 patients were involved.We analyzed the tumor recurrence(OR=5.44,95%CI:1.34-22.06),tumor metastasis(OR=0.39,95%CI:0.18-0.83),5-year overall survival(OS)(OR=0.87,95%CI:0.32-2.36),5-year cancer specific survival(CSS)(OR=0.52,95%CI:0.05-5.88),Scr(MD=-11.63,95%CI:-24.58-1.32),and GFR(MD=6.75,95%CI:-0.55-14.06)after PN and RN.There was no significant difference in 5-year OS,5-year CSS,Scr and GFR between RN and RN.RN was superior to PN in tumor recurrence,but PN was superior in tumor metastasis.Conclusions There is no significant difference between PN and RN in5-year OS,5-year CSS and renal function.RN is superior to PN in local recurrence.However,in distant metastasis,PN is better.PN could maximally preserve the remaining renal function and improve the quality of life in late stage.Therefore,PN is an effective and reliable treatment for T1 b renal cell carcinoma.
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2015年第7期484-488,共5页 Journal of Modern Urology
关键词 T1b期肾癌 肾部分切除术 肾癌根治术 疗效 预后 T1b renal cell carcinoma partial nephrectomy radical nephrectomy efficacy prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1LJUNGBERG B,HANBURY DC,KUCZYK MA,et al.Renal cell carcinoma guideline[J].Eur Urol,2007,51(6):1502-1510.
  • 2ANTONELLI A,COZZOLI A,NICOLAI M,et al.Nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in the treatment of intracapsular renal cell carcinoma up to 7 cm[J].Eur Urol,2008,53(4):803-809.
  • 3KIM JM,SONG PH,KIM HT,et al.Comparison of partial and radical nephrectomy for pT1b renal cell carcinoma[J].Korean J Urol,2010,51(9):596-600.
  • 4SIMMONS MN,WEIGHT CJ,GILL IS.Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy for tumors >4 cm: intermediate-term oncologic and functional outcomes[J].Urology,2009,73(5):1077-1082.
  • 5IIZUKA J,KONDO T,HASHIMOTO Y,et al.Similar functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy for clinical T1b and T1a renal cell carcinoma[J].Int J Urol,2012,19(11):980-986.
  • 6BADALATO GM,KATES M,WISNIVESKY JP,et al.Survival after partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of stage T1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA: a propensity scoring approach[J].BJU Int,2012,109(10):1457-1462.
  • 7ANTONELLI A,ZANI D,COZZOLI A,et al.Nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma up to 7 cm[J].Urologia,2007,74(3):173-179.
  • 8DASH A,VICKERS AJ,SCHACHTER LR,et al.Comparison of outcomes in elective partial vs radical nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma of 4-7 cm[J].BJU Int,2006,97(5):939-945.
  • 9Weight CJ,Larson BT,Gao T,et al.Elective partial nephrectomy in patients with clinical T1b renal tumors is associated with improved overall survival[J].Urology,2010,76(3):631-637.
  • 10RUSSO P,HUANG W.The medical and oncological rationale for partial nephrectomy for the treatment of T1 renal cortical tumors[J].Urol Clin North America,2008,35(4):635-643; vii.

同被引文献51

  • 1张丽中,赵智,吴滨.恶性肿瘤患者血浆纤维蛋白原和D二聚体含量的测定及其临床意义[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2006,18(11):759-760. 被引量:25
  • 2贺淑霞,雷晓丽.血浆纤维蛋白原水平与恶性肿瘤的生长转移关系[J].宁夏医学院学报,2007,29(5):508-509. 被引量:12
  • 3Ruutu M,Bono P,Taari K.Resection of renal cell cancer metastases:Where do we stand in 2008[J].Eur Urol,2008,7(5):436-442.
  • 4McLaughlin JK,Lipworth L.Epidemiologic aspects of renal cell cancer[J].Semin Oncol,2000,27(2):115-123.
  • 5Martel CL,Lara PN.Renal cell carcinoma:Current status and future directions[J].Crit Rev Oncol Hematol,2003,45(2):177-190.
  • 6Boorjian SA,Crispen PL,Lohse CM,et al.Surgical resection of isolated retroperitoneal lymph node recurrence of renal cell carcinoma following nephrectomy[J].J Urol,2008,180(1):99-103.
  • 7Marqulis V,McDonald M,Tamboli P,et al.Predictors of oncological outcome after resection of locally recurrent renal cell carcinoma[J].J Urol,2009,181(5):2044-2051.
  • 8Leibovich BC,Pantuck AJ,Bui MH,et al.Current staging of renal cell carcinoma[J].Urol Clin North Am,2003,30(3):481-497.
  • 9Sundaram V,Fiqenshau RS,Roytman TM,et al.Positive margin during partial nephrectomy:Does cancer remain in the renal remnant[J]-Urology,2011,77(6):1400-1403.
  • 10Li QL,Cheng L,Guan HW,et al.Safety and efficacy of mini-margin nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4cm or less[J].Urology,2008,71(5):924-927.

引证文献6

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部