期刊文献+

主观时间流逝速度调节情绪效价的特异性 被引量:4

The Specifi city of Modulation of Subjective Time Speed on Emotional Valence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究在中国情绪图片系统中随机选取200张情绪图片,并在不同的主观时间流逝速度下,对其进行效价和唤醒度评分,探讨主观时间流逝速度对不同的情绪维度(效价和唤醒度)以及情绪的不同水平的调节效应是否一致。研究结果表明,主观时间流逝速度增加时,人们对中性和正性情绪图片的评价更加积极,但主观时间流逝速度不能调节人们对负性情绪图片的评价,也不能调节人们的唤醒水平。结果提示"时间飞逝时,我更快乐"效应具有效价特异性。 Previous study revealed that emotion can be modulated by subjective speed of time. People evaluate experiences more favorably when they think time passed more quickly. However, the intensity of emotion was weak in the previous study. It is not clear whether the subjective speed of time could modulate extremely pleasant and unpleasant emotions, and whether this effect is specific for emotional valence. The present study focused on the effect of subjective time speed on different dimensions (valence and arousal) and levels of emotion. Thirty four right-handed undergraduates (10 male) were paid for participation in the experiment. They were asked to set aside all possible distractions, including watches and mobile phones, thus leaving no external time cues. 200 emotion pictures were randomly chosen from the native Chinese Affective Picture System (CAPS). Emotional pictures and timer were displayed on a screen of a computer running MATLAB with Psychtoolbox. The valence and arousal of emotional pictures were rated with 9-point Likert scale under time flying and time dragging conditions. The timer was 1.5 times of normal in the time flying condition, and it was 0.7 times of normal in the time dragging condition. Participants were told that the task was irrelevant with timer, and he just need to view the pictures and rate the valence or arousal according to his subjective feeling. The valence and arousal of emotional pictures were analyzed respectively. 200 pictures were divided into 10 levels based on their valence scores in the CAPS. The two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted on valence with subjective time speed (time flying & time dragging) and valence levels (10 levels) as within-subject factors. The repeated ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between subjective time speed and valence levels. The sample effects tests revealed that there were no significant differences between time flying and time dragging conditions in the four low levels of valence (from level 1 to level 4), whereas the scores of valence were significant higher in the timing flying than time dragging in the six high levels of valence (from level 5 to level 10). Then 200 pictures were divided into 10 levels based on their arousal scores in the CAPS. The repeated ANOVA on arousal did not reveal any significant main effect and interaction.The present study confirmed previous finding that emotion can be modulated by subjective speed of time. Furthermore, our results showed that the valence evaluation of neutral and positive pictures was more positive under time flying compared with time dragging, whereas the subjective speed of time did not modulate the valence evaluation of negative pictures as well as the arousal evaluation of all pictures. The results suggest that the "You’re having fun, When time flies" effect is valence-specific.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期834-838,共5页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 自然科学基金项目(31200855 31300845) 重庆文理学院引进人才项目(R2012JY23) 重庆市人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(10SKB23) 西南大学博士基金项目(SWU110037)的资助
关键词 主观时间 情绪 效价 唤醒度 subjective time emotion valence arousal
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1白露,马慧,黄宇霞,罗跃嘉.中国情绪图片系统的编制——在46名中国大学生中的试用[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(11):719-722. 被引量:310
  • 2黄希庭.(2001).当代中国心理学.北京:人民教育出版社.
  • 3黄希庭,李伯约,张志杰.时间认知分段综合模型的探讨[J].西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2003,29(2):5-9. 被引量:73
  • 4黄希庭,徐光国.对变化/分割模型的检验(Ⅱ)[J].心理学报,1999,31(2):135-141. 被引量:21
  • 5Angrilli, A., Cherubini, P., Pavese, A., & Manfredini, A. (1997). The influence of affective factors on time perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 59(6), 972 - 982.
  • 6Boyle, S. H., Jackson, W. G., & Suarez, E. C. (2007). Hostility, anger, and depression predict increases in C3 over a 10-year period. Brain Behavior and Immunity, 21(6), 816 - 823.
  • 7Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysies toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433-436.
  • 8Conrad, F. G., Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., & Peytehev, A. (2010). The impact of progress indicators on task eompletian. Interaefng vdth Computers, 22(5), 417 - 427.
  • 9Danekert, J. A., & Allman, A. A. A. (2005). Time flies when you're having fun: Temporal estimation and the experience of boredom. Brain and Cognition, 59(3), 236 - 245.
  • 10Dinard, M. B., Warm, J. S., Funke, G. J., Vidulich, M. A., Nelson, W. T., Eggemeier, T. F., et al. (2013). Vigilance hard work even if time flies. Proeeech'ngs of the Human Factors and Ergononges Society Annual Meerng, 57(1), 1114- 1118.

二级参考文献45

共引文献389

同被引文献68

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部