期刊文献+

改良Gow-Gates下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中的应用 被引量:4

Clinical study of modified Gow-Gates technique of inferior alveolar nerve block in impacted mandibular third molar extraction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨一种微创高效的下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉方法。方法:将206例门诊拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙患者随机分为2组,实验组105例采用改良Gow-Gates法,对照组101例采用传统口内注射法(Halstead法)。记录麻醉成功率、麻醉效果和并发症,采用SPSS17.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果:改良Gow-Gates法麻醉成功率为97.15%,Halstead法为89.10%,2组间显著差异(P=0.038)。改良Gow-Gates法在麻醉效果A、B级比率为90.48%,Halstead法为87.13%,2组间无显著性差异(P=0.446)。改良Gow-Gates法的并发症显著少于Halstead法(P=0.014)。结论:GowGates下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉是一种微创高效的麻醉方法 。 PURPOSE: To introduce a minimally invasive and more effective teehnique of inferior alveolar nerve bloek. METHODS: Two hundred and six patients who needed extraction of the impacted mandibular third molar were divided randomly into 2 groups: the experimental group (105 cases ) with modified Gow-Gates technique (modified Gow-Gates group) and the eontrol group (101 eases) with Halstead technique (Halstead group). The anesthetic success rates, effects and eomplieations were recorded and analyzed with SPSS17.0 software package. RESULTS: The anesthetic success rate was 97.15% in modified Cow-Gates group and 89.10% in Halstead group with significant difference between the 2 groups (P=0.038〈0.05); In comparing the anesthesia grade, the ration of grade A and B accounted for 90.48% in modified Cow- Gates group and 87.13% in Halstead group (P=0.446〉0,05). Modified Gow-Gates group had much fewer of eomplieations than Halstead group (P=0.014〈0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Modified Gow-Gates technique is a minimMly invasive and more effective teehnique for inferior alveolar nerve bloek anesthesia.
出处 《上海口腔医学》 CAS CSCD 2015年第3期373-377,共5页 Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
基金 乐清市科技计划项目(2014y027)~~
关键词 下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉 下颌阻生第三磨牙 拔牙 Gow-Gates法 微创高效 Inferior alveolar nerve bloek Mandibular impacted third molar Tooth extraction Gow-Gates technique Minimally invasive technique
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献77

  • 1李刚,倪宗瓒.设计牙科人力指数评估牙科人力资源[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2004,22(3):255-258. 被引量:6
  • 2冯丽华,吴佩玲,熊云新,覃汉宁,覃远生.医学实习生与患者冲突原因分析与对策[J].医学文选,2005,24(5):807-808. 被引量:1
  • 3于世凤.口腔组织病理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:149.
  • 4李仲廉.临床疼痛治疗学[M].第2版.天津:天津科学技术出版社,2000:8.
  • 5Gow-Gates GA. Mandibular conduction anesthesia: a newtechnic using extraoral landmarks [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1973, 36 (3) : 321-328.
  • 6王龚,译.实用口腔局部麻醉学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2006.92-94.
  • 7Gow-Gates G, Watsan JE,Gow-Gates. Mandibular block-applied anatomy and histology[J]. Anesth Prog, 1989,36 (4-5) : 193-195.
  • 8Watson JE, Cow-Gates GAE. A clinical evaluation of the Cow-Gates mandibular block technique [J]. NZ Dent J, 1976, 72: 220-221.
  • 9Hersh EV, Giannakopoulos H, Levin LM, et al. The pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects of high-dose articaine with h 100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine [J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2006, 137 (11): 1562-1571.
  • 10Kaufman E, Goharian S, Katz Y. Adverse reactions triggered by dental local anesthetics: A clinical survey [J]. Anesth Prog, 2000, 47 (4) :134-138.

共引文献30

同被引文献34

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部