期刊文献+

经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜手术治疗输卵管妊娠的对比研究 被引量:50

Comparative Study Between Transumbilical Laparoscopic Single-site Surgery and Three-port Traditional Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统三孔腹腔镜异位妊娠手术的临床效果。方法选择2012年1月-2013年12月在我院接受异位妊娠手术120例,患者根据自身经济情况选择手术方式,其中单孔腹腔镜组66例,传统三孔腹腔镜组54例,比较2组患者手术时间、术中出血量、肠道功能恢复时间、术后疼痛视觉模拟评分、术后住院时间、手术费用、术后切口愈合情况、术后患者满意度等。结果单孔腹腔镜组手术时间(30.6±6.3)min,明显长于传统三孔腹腔镜组(20.1±6.9)min(t=8.701,P=0.000)。单孔腹腔镜组和传统三孔腹腔镜组术中出血量、肠道功能恢复时间、术后住院时间、术后拔除尿管时间、手术费用和术后患者满意度差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。单孔腹腔镜组术后第1、3天疼痛视觉模拟评分分别为(3.2±0.8)、(1.5±0.7)分,显著低于传统三孔腹腔镜组(3.9±0.8)、(2.3±0.6)分(t=-4.769,P=0.000;t=-6.636,P=0.000)。结论单孔腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠是安全可行的,且能减轻患者的术后疼痛,并能达到更好的美容效果。 Objective To compare clinical outcomes between laparoscopic single-site surgery and traditional three-port laparoscopy in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Methods From January 2012 to December 2013,120 patients with ectopic pregnancy were randomly divided into either single-site group( n = 66) or three-port group( n = 54) in this hospital. The outcomes of laparoscopic single-site and three-port surgery were evaluated. The operative time,blood loss,intestinal function recovery time,postoperative pain scores,postoperative hospital stay,surgical costs,wound healing,and postoperative patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results In the single-site group,the operative time( 30. 6 ± 6. 3) min was longer than that in the three-port group( 20. 1 ± 6. 9) min,with statistically significant difference( t = 8. 701,P = 0. 000). No difference was found in intraoperative blood loss, intestinal function recovery time, postoperative hospital stay, surgical costs, wound healing, and postoperative patient satisfaction between the two groups( P〉0. 05). On the first and third postoperative day,the VAS were( 3. 2 ±0. 8) and( 1. 5 ± 0. 7) points in the single-site group,which were significantly lower than those in the three-port group( 3. 9 ± 0. 8)and( 2. 3 ± 0. 6) points,with statistically significant differences( t =-4. 769,P = 0. 000; t =-6. 636,P = 0. 000). Conclusion Laparoscopic single-site surgery is feasible and safe to treat ectopic pregnancy,bearing decreased pain and improved cosmetic outcomes.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第7期610-612,615,共4页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
基金 陕西省卫计委扶持项目(项目编号:2014D88)
关键词 腹腔镜手术 异位妊娠 单孔 Laparoscopy Ectopic pregnancy Single port
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献57

  • 1李晓燕,冷金花.机器人辅助的腹腔镜手术在妇科领域的应用现状[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2007,8(3):225-228. 被引量:5
  • 2Weingertner AS,Rodriguez B,Ziane A,et al. The use of JJ stent in the management of deep endometriosis lesion,affecting or poten- tially affecting the ureter:a review of our practice [J]. BJOG, 2008,115 (9) : 1159-1164.
  • 3Benbara A,Fortin A, Martin B, et al. Surgical and functional results of rectosigmoidal resection for severe endometriosis [J]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil,2008,36(12) : 1191-1201.
  • 4Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Gagliardi ML, et al. Discoid or segmental rec- tosigmoid resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis:a case- control study [J ]. Fertil Steril, 2010,94 (2) :444-449.
  • 5Querleu D. Radical hysterectomies by the Schauta-Amreich and Schauta-Stoeckel techniques assisted by celioscopy [J ]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 1991,20 ( 5 ) : 747-748.
  • 6Nezhat CR,Burrell MO,Nezhat FR,et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1992,166(3 ) : 864-865.
  • 7Chang WC,Lee LC, Huang SC,et al. Application of laparoscopic surgery in gynecological oncology [J]. J Formos Med Assoc ,2010,109 (8) :558-566.
  • 8Kohler C, Klemm P, Schau A,et al. Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center :analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenec- tomies [J ]. Gynecol Oncol, 2004,95 ( 1 ) : 52-61.
  • 9Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Ciravolo G,et al. Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2007,106(3) :502-506.
  • 10Zullo F,Palomba S,Falbo A,et al. Laparoscopic surgery vs laparotomy for early stage endometrial cancer:long-term data of a randomized controlled trial [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009,200 (3) : 296.e 1-9.

共引文献217

同被引文献330

  • 1孙大为.单孔腹腔镜手术在妇科的应用探讨[J].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2013,6(1):5-8. 被引量:36
  • 2Barnhart KT. Clinical practice, Ectopic pregnancy[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009,361(4) :379-387.
  • 3Martin JN Jr, Sessums JK, Martin RW, et al. Abdominal pregnancy Current concepts of management[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1988,71 (4) : 549-557.
  • 4Kamann K. Case of apparent secondary abdominal pregnancy in a rabbit after primary rupture of the uterus[J]. Br Med J, 1903,1 (Z201) :543.
  • 5Lee JW, Sohn KM, Jung HS. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005,184(5) :1600-1601.
  • 6Chetty M, Elson J. Treating non-tubal ectopic pregnancy[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,2009,23(4):529 538.
  • 7Friedrieh EG Jr, Rankin CA Jr. Primary pelvic peritoneal pregnancy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1968,31(5) :649-653.
  • 8Shin JS, Moon YJ, Kim SR, et al. Primary peritoneal pregnancy implanted on the uterosaeral ligament: a case report[J]. J Korean Med Sci,2000,15(3) :359-362.
  • 9Wheeless CR Jr,Thompson BH. Laparoscopic sterilization. Reviewof 3 600 eases[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1973,42(5) : 751-758.
  • 10Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, et al. Single-port access laparoseopic- assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2009,16 (4) : 450-453.

引证文献50

二级引证文献379

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部