期刊文献+

24 h多通道腔内阻抗联合pH监测诊断咽喉反流的初步应用 被引量:11

Application of 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance in combination with pH monitoring for the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux: a pilot study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 研究24 h多通道腔内阻抗联合pH监测(multichannel intraluminal impedance,MII-pH)在诊断咽喉反流中的特点和问题.方法 对2014年2-12月怀疑存在咽喉反流的60例患者行24 h MII-pH监测,统计pH<4的波形次数、伪像、酸反流次数、弱酸反流次数、弱碱反流次数、酸反流时间、酸清除时间、立位酸反流次数、卧位酸反流次数以及反流症状指数、反流体征评分量表.结果 软件分析识别出咽喉部pH <4的反流波形45次,人工分析观察到咽喉部pH <4的波形140次,其中由反流引起的咽喉部pH <4的波形78次(55.7%),其余为各类伪像62次(44.3%),人工分析与软件自动分析的一致性一般(κ =0.234).60例患者中咽喉反流阳性17例(28.3%),17例阳性患者各项反流参数用M[P25,P75]表示,其中酸反流次数5.0[4.0,8.8]、弱酸反流次数6.5[5.3,0.3]、弱碱反流次数1.0[0.0,2.0]、酸反流总时间3.8[2.3,7.2] min、酸清除时间36.0[21.5,57.6]s,立位酸反流次数4.0[3.0,4.8]、卧位酸反流次数1.5[0.0,2.3],咽喉反流中立位酸反流次数多于卧位,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.571,P<0.05).24 h MII-pH监测与反流症状指数、反流体征评分量表结果的一致性中等(κ =0.590).结论 对反流图形进行软件自动分析时存在漏判和误判,人工分析反流图形可提高结果的准确性.24 h MII-pH监测的可重复性较好,但诊断咽喉反流性疾病时存在假阳性和假阴性的问题,应结合病史和喉镜检查综合分析. Objective To explore the diagnostic characteristics of 24 hours multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).Methods Patients who were suspected to have laryngopharyngeal reflux (LRP) between February and December 2014 were included.The frequency of pH 〈 4 waveform,artifacts,numbers of acid reflux events,weakly acidic reflux events,weakly alkaline reflux events,time of acid exposure,time of acid clearance,acid reflux events in upright position and supine position,reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux findings score (RFS) were analyzed.Results Forty-five times pH 〈 4 reflux waveform were identified according to software analysis.140 pH drops of 4 were observed according to manual analysis,in which 78 times were caused by reflux and 62 artifacts.The consistency of manual analysis and software automatically analysis was general (κ =0.234).The positive rate of 60 patients was 28.3% (17/60).In the 17 LPR patients,the median number[P25,P75] of acid reflux events was 5.0[4.0,8.8],weakly acidic reflux events was 6.5 [5.3,10.3],weakly alkaline reflux events was 1.0 [0.0,2.0],time of acid exposure was 3.8 [2.3,7.2] min,time of acid clearance was 36.0 [21.5,57.6] s,acid reflux events in upright position was 4.0[3.0,4.8] and in supine position was 1.5 [0.0,2.3].All the data were approximately identical with the domestic and foreign literature.24 hours MII-pH monitoring and RSI + RFS had medium consistency (κ =0.590).Conclusions 24 hours MII-pH monitoring has ideal repeatability,but false positive and false negative can not be avoided completely.The diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux shoull be combined with medical history and laryngoscopy.
出处 《中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第7期564-568,共5页 Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
关键词 喉咽反流 电阻抗 食管PH监测 Laryngopharyngeal reflux Electric impedance Esophageal pH monitoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Tauber S, Gross M, Issing WJ. Association of laryngopharyngeal symptoms with gastroesophageal reflux disease [ J ]. Laryngoscope, 2002, 112(5) :879-886.
  • 2Koufman JA. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) : a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 2d-hour pH monitoring and anexperimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury[ J]. Laryngoscope, 1991,101 (d Pt 2 Suppl 53 ) : 1-78.
  • 3Koufman JA. Laryngopharyngeal reflux is different from classic gastroesophageal reflux disease[ J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2002, 81 (9 Suppl 2) :7-9.
  • 4王晓晔,叶京英,韩德民.全天咽喉pH检测在诊断反流性咽喉部疾病中的作用[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2007,42(11):834-838. 被引量:40
  • 5Wenzl TG, Benninga MA, Loots CM, et al. Indications, methodology, and interp'etatiou f eomb:,ued esplageal impedance-pH monitoring in children: ESPGHAN EURO-PIG standard protocol[ J]. ] Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2012, 55 (2) :230-234.
  • 6Vailati C, Mazzo|eni G, Bondi S, et at. Oropharyngeal pH monitoring for laryngopharyngeal reflux: is it a reliable test before therapy'?. [J]. ] Voice, 2013, 27(l) :84-89.
  • 7Wo JM, Jabbar A, Winstead W, et al. Hypopharyngeal pH monitoring artifact in detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux [J ]. Dig Dis Sci ,2002,47 ( 11 ) :2579-2585.
  • 8Eubanks TR, Omelanczuk PE, Maronian N, et al. Pharyngeal pH monitoring in 222 patients with suspected laryngeal reflux [ J ]. J Gastrointest Surg,2001,5 (2) : 183-190.
  • 9Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index ( RSI ) [ J ]. J Voice, 2002,16 ( 2 ) : 274-.
  • 10Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score ( RFS ) [ J ]. Laryngoscope, 2001,111 (8) :1313-1317.

二级参考文献79

  • 1冯桂建,刘玉兰.含餐3h食管pH监测和24h pH监测的比较[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(49):3517-3518. 被引量:1
  • 2Simpson CB, Archilla AS, Velazquez RA, et al. Resolution of vocal fold leukoplakia with proton-pump inhibitor therapy. Ear Nose Throat J, 2006,85:362-364.
  • 3Williams RB, Ali GN, Wallace KL, et al. Esophagopharyngeal acid regurgitation : dual pH monitoring criteria for its detection and insights into mechanisms. Gastroenterology, 1999, 117: 1051- 1061.
  • 4Harrell SP, Koopman J, Woosley S, et al. Exclusion of pH artifacts is essential for hypopharyngeal pH monitoring. Laryngoscope, 2007,117:470-474.
  • 5Vincent DA Jr, Garrett JD, Radionoff SL, et al. The proximal probe in esophageal pH monitoring: development of a normative database. J Voice, 2000, 14:247-254.
  • 6de Vincentiis M, Gallo A, Boccia MM, et al. Environmental and occupational risk factors in keratosis of the larynx. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 1993,13:43-52.
  • 7Lenglinger J, Ringhofer C, Eisler M, et al. Histopathology of columnar-lined esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2007,119:405-411.
  • 8Galli J, Frenguelli A, Calo L, et al. Role of gastroesophageal reflux in precancerous conditions and in squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx: our experience. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 2001, 21:350-355.
  • 9Storr M, Meining A, Allescher HD. Pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis ,2000,18:93-102.
  • 10Tokashiki R, Nakamura K, Watanabe Y, et al. The relationship between esophagoscopic findings and total acid reflux time below pH 4 and pH 5 in the upper esophagus in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). Auris Nasus Larynx, 2005, 32:265-268.

共引文献115

同被引文献117

引证文献11

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部