摘要
我国司法实践中,未达到法定开发条件的土地使用权转让案件,各地法院判决不一,严重损害了司法判决的统一性和法律的权威性。现行法律规定的土地使用权转让的开发投资限制,会被一方当事人为获取更大利益而利用,司法权力容易被滥用,导致实质公正受损,不利于我国诚信社会的建设,也严重损害了土地使用权转让的交易安全,与现行土地流转政策不符。基于物权、合同、土地管理目的等角度,重新审视我国《城市房地产管理法》第39条的规定及其存在的合理性,本研究认为应在立法层面解决司法困局,并删除开发投资比例这一法定转让条件,不管土地是否达到法定投资开发条件,土地管理部门都应办理土地变更登记。
In the judicial practices of different courts of our country, inconsistent judgments for the cases, which are about the land use rights transfer that fails to reach the legal condition of invest- ment development, seriously damage uniformity of judicial practice and authority of law. The current law' s restrictions on the development investment may be exploited one party, and judicial powers may be abused. All these will lead obtain much larger profits by the loss of substantial justice which does no good to the construction of an honesty society, and the heavy damage of transaction security which does not conform to the current land circulation policy. From the standpoint of proper- ty rights, contract and aim of land administration, the article reexamines the rationality of Article 39 of City Real Estate Management Law, and suggests resolving the judicial dilemma at the level of leg- islation and deleting the legal transfer condition of development investment proportion.
出处
《南京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第7期97-103,共7页
Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
关键词
法定开发条件
土地使用权转让
合同效力
legal development condition
land use rights transfer
validity of contract