期刊文献+

牙科高速手机辅助微创拔牙的冷却水选择初探 被引量:2

A preliminary investigation on the selection of cooling water in minimally invasive exodontia assisted by high-speed dental handpiece
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对临床常用的消毒牙科综合治疗台水路系统方法:次氯酸钠法消毒效果的评价,初步探讨牙科高速手机辅助微创拔牙的冷却水选择。方法随机选择10台独立水源口腔综合治疗台,分别采集其水路经700 mg/L次氯酸钠消毒后接诊患者前(8∶00)、中午下班前(11∶30)和下午下班前(17∶30)3个时间点高速手机出水口水样,检测并计算总菌落数。所得数据利用SPSS 19.0统计软件进行广义估计方程进行分析。结果不同时间点水样微生物总菌落数不同。未接诊病人时,水样中未检测出细菌。下午时间点细菌数量最多,中午时间点细菌数量次之。广义估计方程分析结果显示不同测量时间点上的微生物菌落数的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论次氯酸钠消毒剂对口腔综合治疗台水路具有良好消毒效果,但随着时间的推移在综合治疗台使用过程中,水路系统会遭到污染,达不到拔牙手术无菌要求,需要选择其他方式的手机冷却水系统。 Objective To investigate the selection of cooling water in minimally invasive exodontia using high speed handpiece by evaluating the effect of sodium hypochlorite disinfection method which is a common approach to sterilize dental unit waterlines( DUWLs). Methods Ten dental units were randomly selected. Water samples were taken from their water outlets of high-speed handpiece at three different time points: 8∶ 00( the time after sterilization with 700 mg / L sodium hypochlorite and before receiving patients),11∶ 30( the time right after semi-day's therapy) and 17∶ 30( the time right before the end of the daily clinical work),respectively. Then,Colony-Forming Units( CFU) were counted. The data were analyzed by generalized estimating equation with SPSS 19. 0 software. Results The CFUs of water samples at different time points were significantly( P〈0.05). No microorganisms were detected in samples of 8 ∶ 00. Microorganisms were detected in samples of 11∶ 30 and 17∶ 30,and the CFUs observed in samples of the latter were more than those of the former. Conclusions Sodium hypochlorite has a good effect on DUWLs infection control. However,during the use of the dental unit,the waterlines can be contaminated,which does not cater for the requirements of exodontia which should be an aseptic operation. Therefore,it is necessary to apply other cooling water system for high- speed handpieces to cooling water systems in minimally invasive exodontia.
作者 何芸 陈俊良
出处 《口腔医学》 CAS 2015年第7期557-559,共3页 Stomatology
基金 四川省卫生厅青年基金项目(130378)
关键词 微创拔牙 口腔综合治疗台 次氯酸钠 高速手机 minimally invasive exodontia dental unit waterlines sodium hypochlorite high-speed handpiece
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Saund D,Dietrich T.Minimally-invasive tooth extraction:doorknobs and strings revisited[J].Dent Update,2013,40(4):325-330.
  • 2Rahnama M,Czupkao L,Czajkowski L,et al.The use of piezosurgery as an alternative method of minimally invasivesurgery in the authors[J].Wideochir Inne Tech Malo Inwazyjne,2013,8(4):321-326.
  • 3Sitkowska J,Szymanska J.Bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines[J].Environ Monit Assess,2013,18(5):3603-3611.
  • 4Arvand M,Hack Microbial A.Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines in dental practices in Hesse,Germany:a cross-section study[J]Eur J Microbiol Immunol,2013,7(1):49-52.
  • 5Porteous N,Luo J,Hererra M,et al.Growth and identification of Bacteria in N-Halamine Dental Unit Waterline Tubing Using an Ultrapure Water Source[J].Int J Microbiol,2011,15(9):21-27.
  • 6Petti S,Moroni C,Messano GA,et al.Detection of oral streptococci in dental unit water lines after therapy with air turbine handpiece:biological fluid retraction more frequent than expected[J].Future Microbiol,2013,8(3):413-421.
  • 7章小缓,姬亚昆,凌均棨,侯水平,陈守义.次氯酸钠消毒口腔综合治疗台水路的效果评价[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版),2011,5(4):33-37. 被引量:31
  • 8赵红,苏静,刘晓勇,贾淑玲.平板接种法监测牙科综合治疗台水路菌落总数的可行性研究[J].中国感染控制杂志,2013,12(1):16-18. 被引量:4
  • 9Toomarian L,Rikhtegaran S,Sadighi M,et al.Contamination of dental unit water and air outlets following use of clean head system and conventional handpieces[J].J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects,2007,10(6):43-47.
  • 10Liaje A,Ozkan YK,Ozkan Y,et al.Stability and marginal bone loss with three types of early loaded implants during the first 2012 after loading[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2012,27(1):162-172.

二级参考文献59

  • 1伊大海,王炳华,冯言,卢爱工.《医疗机构口腔诊疗器械消毒技术操作规范》解读[J].中国实用医药,2007,2(6):119-120. 被引量:8
  • 2Montebugnoli L,Sambri V,Cavrini F,et al.Detection of DNA from periodontal pathogenic bacteria in biofilm obtained from waterlines in dental units.New Microbiol,2004,27 (4):391-397.
  • 3Szymanska J.Electron microscopic examination of dental unit waterlines biofilm.Ann Agric Environ Med,2005,12(2):295-298.
  • 4Mavridou A,Kamma J,Mandilara G,et al.Microbial risk assessment of dental unit water systems in general dental practice in Greece.Water Sci Technol,2006,54(3):269-273.
  • 5ADA Council on Scientific Affairs and ADA Council on Dental Practice.Infection control recommendations for the dental office and the dental laboratory.J Am Dent Assoc,1996,127(5):672-680.
  • 6Souza-Gugelmin MC,Lima CD,Lima SN,et al.Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines.Braz Dent J,2003,14 (1):55-57.
  • 7Mills SE.Waterbome pathogens and dental waterlines.Dent Clin North Am,2003,47(3):545-557.
  • 8Kettering JD,Mufloz-Viveros CA,Stephens JA,et al.Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines:distilled water vs.antimicrobial agents.J Calif Dent Assoc,2002,30 (10):735-741.
  • 9Mills SE,Karpay RI.Dental waterlines and biofilm-searching for solutions.Compend Contin Educ Dent,2002,23 (3):237-240,242,244.
  • 10Prevost AP,Robert M,Charland R,et al.Doctor,would you drink water from your dental unit? N Y State Dent J,1995,61 (10):22-28.

共引文献58

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部