期刊文献+

STPA危险分析方法及其在ATSA-ITP设计中的应用 被引量:6

STPA hazard analysis method and its application in ATSA-ITP design
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统危险分析方法无法胜任对复杂的非线性社会技术系统的分析。系统理论过程分析(STPA)方法是建立在系统理论事故建模和过程(STAMP)基础上的一种新型的危险分析方法,它将安全视为系统的一种涌现特性,认为除了组件失效,组件间的非功能交互也是导致危险的主要原因,并通过定义系统危险、绘制安全控制结构、识别不安全控制行为、确定不安全控制行为起因等4个步骤完成危险分析过程。美国的空中交通态势感知尾随程序(ATSA-ITP)设计案例分析表明,STPA方法的组织形式有序,逻辑结构严谨,分析过程透彻。 The traditional hazard analysis methods are not competent to analyze complex socio-technical systems with distinct nonlinearity characteristics. STPA,that sees the safety as an emergence property of system,is a new hazard analysis method on the basis of Systems-Theoretic Accident Modeling and Processes( STAMP) model,and thinks that the disfunctional interaction between the system components is also an important causation besides component failures. It completes the entire hazard analysis process by four steps including defining the system hazards,drawing the safety control structure,identifying the unsafe control actions and determining the potential causes for each unsafe control action. The case for Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness In-Trail Procedures( ATSA-ITP) design shows that STPA method has many advantages such as ordered organization format,strict logic structure,intensive analysis process and so on,and the obtained results have better practical value.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期80-86,共7页 China Safety Science Journal
关键词 系统理论过程分析(STPA) 危险分析方法 涌现特性 安全约束 安全控制结构 不安全控制行为 systems-theoretic process analysis(STPA) hazard analysis method emergence property safety constraint safety control structure unsafe control action
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Huang G Q, Shi J, Mak K L. Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) over the WWW[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2000, 16(8) : 603 - 608.
  • 2崔铁军,马云东.多维空间故障树构建及应用研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2013,23(4):32-37. 被引量:115
  • 3Leveson N. A new approach to hazard analysis for complex systems[C]. Proceedings of International Conference of the System Safety Society, 2003 : 498 - 507.
  • 4Leveson N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems[J]. Safety Science, 2004, 42(4): 237 -270.
  • 5Leveson N, Daouk M, Dulac N, et al. Applying STAMP in accident analysis. Proceedings of Second Workshop Inves- tigation and Reporting of Accidents, 2003 : 189 - 210.
  • 6Couturier M. A case study of vioxx using STAMP[D]. Montreal: McGill University, 2010.
  • 7Nancy G, Leveson N. A systems-theoretic approach to safety in software-Intensive systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2004, 1 ( 1 ) : 66 - 86.
  • 8Song Y. Applying system-theoretic accident model and processes (STAMP) to hazard analysisE D. Montreal: Mcmaster University, 2012.
  • 9Fleming C H, Spencer M, Leveson N. Safety assurance in NextGen[R]. NASA, 2012.

二级参考文献6

共引文献114

同被引文献23

引证文献6

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部