期刊文献+

急性髓系白血病患者诱导缓解化疗微小残留白血病检测与预后的关系 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨急性髓系白血病患者诱导缓解化疗后微小残留白血病检测对预后评估的临床意义。方法选择2009年1月至2011年12月濮阳市人民医院收治的急性髓系白血病患者35例,从诱导化疗第21天后开始采用FCM(多参数流式细胞术)检测微小残留病灶,CD45/SSC设门,应用2~4组四色抗体组合,并根据检测结果分为高水平组(MRD在1×10“以上)、中水平组(MRD在1×10-4~1×10-12)、低水平组(MRD在1×10-4以下),之后每月检测1次,观察三组不同MRD水平患者的2年复发率及以后差异。结果随访12~24个月,MRD高、中、低水平三组患者2年复发率为100.00%、12.50%、0,且高水平组复发率明显高于中、低水平组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。10例患者形态学上达到完全缓解时MRD阳性,25例患者形态学上达到完全缓解时MRD阴性,形态学完全缓解时MRD阳性患者复发率明显高于MRD阴性患者,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论对于急性髓系白血病患者诱导缓解化疗后监测MRD水平有利于评估预后,MRD超过1×1012时提示具有高度复发可能性,且MRD阳性的出现早于形态学。
出处 《中国实用医刊》 2015年第15期107-108,共2页 Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献25

  • 1Basso G, Veltroni M, Valsecchi MG, et al. Risk of relapse of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia is predicted by flow cyto- metric measurement of residual disease on day 15 bone marrow. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27:5 168-5174.
  • 2Irving J, Jesson J, Virgo P, et al. Establishment and validation of a standard protocol for the detection of minimal residual disease in B lineage childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia by flow cytome- try in a multi-center setting. Haematologica, 2009, 94:870-874.
  • 3Moricke A, Reiter A, Zimmermann M, et al. Risk-adjusted thera- py of acute lymphoblastic leukemia can decrease treatment burden and improve survival: treatment results of 2169 unselected pediat- ric and adolescent patients enrolled in the trialALL-BFM 95. Blood. 2008. 111:4477-4489.
  • 4Campana D. Role of minimal residual disease monitoring in adult and pediatric acute lymphoblastieleukemia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 2009, 23: 1083-1098.
  • 5Nyvold C, Madsen HO, Ryder LP, et al. Precise quantification of minimal residual disease at day 29 allows identification of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and an excellent outcome. Blood ,2002,99 : 1253-1258.
  • 6Borowitz M J, Devidas M, Hunger SP, et al. Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leu- kemia and its relationship to other prognostic factors: a Children' s Oncology Group study. Blood, 2008, 111 : 5477-5485.
  • 7Flohr T, Schrauder A, Cazzaniga G, et al. Minimal residual dis- ease-directed risk stratification using real-time quantitative PCR a- nalysis of immunoglobulin and T cell receptor gene rearrangements in the international multicenter trial AIEOPBFM ALL 2000 for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia, 2008, 22: 771-782.
  • 8Katsibardi K , Moschovi MA, Braoudaki M, et al. Sequential monitoring of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastie leu- kemia 7-year experience in a pediatric' hematology/oncology unit. Leuk Lymph, 2010, 51: 846-852.
  • 9Sutton R, Venn NC, Tolisann J, et al. Clinical significance of minimal residual disease at day 15 and at the end of therapy in childhood acule lymphoblastic leukacmia. Br J Haematol, 2009, 146 : 292-299.
  • 10Craig FE, Foon KA. Flow eytometric immunophenotyping for he- matologic neoplasms. Blood, 2008,111 : 3941-3967.

共引文献20

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部