期刊文献+

压疮愈合计分量表的汉化及其信效度研究 被引量:70

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:压疮愈合计分量表是用于量化评价压疮护理效果的工具。文中对汉化版压疮愈合计分量表信度和效度进行检验,为评价压疮护理效果提供有效可信的工具。方法采用Brislin翻译模型对原量表进行汉化,经专家组及预试验调适形成量表最终版,并选取126例Ⅱ-Ⅳ期压疮患者进行信度和效度检验。采用项目分析、内容效度、结构效度、反应度、评定者间信度、重测信度对量表的信效度进行分析。结果项目分析结果显示,各条目得分与量表总分相关系数0.616~0.963( P<0.01),上27%高分组(n=35)各条目得分均高于下27%低分组(n=36)(P<0.01)。量表总的内容效度系数为0.965,总分和各条目之间的结构效度系数0.750~0.954(P<0.01)。各条目之间的相关系数0.666~0.826(P<0.01)。治疗后7 d和21 d总分和各条目计分结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。量表总Cronbach′s系数为0.823,各条目Cronbach′s系数分别为0.770、0.791和0.868。评定者间信度均>0.85,各条目重测信度系数为0.826、0.885和0.958(P<0.01)。结论量表中文版有良好的效度和信度,适合用于中国压疮患者的效果评价。 Objective Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing ( PUSH) was published in 1998 by National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel ( NPUAP) as a tool to evaluate the effects of pressure ulcer care.This study aimed to verify the reliability and validity of the Chi-nese version of PUSH in order to provide an efficient and reliable tool for evaluating the effects of pressure ulcer care. Methods Using the Brislin translation model, we translated the English version of PUSH into Chinese and finalized the Chinese version through modifica-tion by an advisory panel, pretests, and verification of its reliability and validity in the care of 126 cases of stage-Ⅱ-Ⅳpressure ulcers. We analyzed the reliability and validity of the scale based on its item scores, content validity, construct validity, Cronbach′s αcoeffi-cient, and test-retest reliability. Results The correlation coefficient value of the total and individual item scores was 0.616-0.963 (P0.85 and the test-retest reliabili-ty coefficients of individual items were 0.826, 0.885, and 0.958, re-spectively ( P〈0.01) . Conclusion The Chinese version of PUSH, with its high validity and reliability, can be used to evaluate interven-tion effectiveness of Chinese patients with pressure ulcers.
出处 《医学研究生学报》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第7期750-754,共5页 Journal of Medical Postgraduates
基金 南京军区科技创新课题(14MS103) 南京军区南京总医院科研基金(2010M012)
关键词 压疮 量表 信效度 效果评价 Pressure ulcer Scale Reliability and validity Effect evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Stotts NA, Rodeheaver GT, Thomas DR, et al. An instrument to measure healing in pressure uleers: development and validation of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing ( PUSH ) [ J 1. J Gerontol Med Science, 2001, 56( 12): M795-M799.
  • 2Berlowitz DR, Ratliff C, Cuddigan J, et al. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. The PUSH tool: a survey to determine its perceived usefulness~ J~. Advances Skin Wound Care, 2005, 18 (9) : 480-483.
  • 3Hon J, Lagden K, Melaren AM, et al. A prospective multicenter study to validate use of the PUSH in patients with diabetic, ve- nous, and pressure ulcers [ J]. Ostomy Wound Manage, 2010, 56(2) : 26-36.
  • 4Gunes UY. A prospective study evaluating the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH Tool) to assess stage I1 , stagellI, and stagelV pressure ulcers[ J]. Ostomy Wound Manage, 2009, 55 ( 5 ) : 48-52.
  • 5Gardner SE, Hillis SL, Frantz RA. A repospeetive study of the PUSH tool in diabetic foot ulcers [ J ]. J Wound Ostomy Conti- nence Nurs, 2011, 38(4) : 385-393.
  • 6蒋琪霞,李晓华,胡素琴,彭青,周昕.压疮愈合计分对评价压疮清创效果的可行性及有效性分析[J].医学研究生学报,2010,23(5):518-521. 被引量:38
  • 7蒋琪霞,李晓华,周昕,彭青,黄秀玲,李洋,朱礼霞.三乙醇胺乳膏湿敷创伤伤口的疗效评价及其愈合计分的可行性分析[J].护理学报,2012,19(13):53-57. 被引量:16
  • 8National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP/EPUAP). Prevention and treat- ment of pressure ulcers treatment : Clinical practice guide. Wash-ington, DC. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. 2009 : 1-15.
  • 9National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) PUSH Tool Version 3.0:1998 ( 1998-9-15 ) [ EB/OL ] [ 2012-1-3 ]. http://www, nupap, org/pressure ulcer scale for healing.
  • 10Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society (WOCNS). Guideline for Prevention and Management of Pressure Ulcers. Copyright by the Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. 15000 Commerce Parkway, Suite C, Mount Laurel 2010:5-20.

二级参考文献82

  • 1吴列,朱远.三乙醇胺治疗乳腺癌改良术后胸壁放射性皮肤损伤的临床观察[J].肿瘤防治杂志,2004,11(10):1083-1084. 被引量:10
  • 2孙永敏,陈刚,江瑞霞,毕文,于金明.比亚芬预防放射性皮肤损伤的疗效观察[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2004,13(4):316-318. 被引量:110
  • 3蒋建新,王正国,尹志勇.战创伤研究进展[J].人民军医,2007,50(1):22-24. 被引量:29
  • 4裘华德,宋九宏.负压封闭引流技术[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.22.
  • 5Capon A,Pavoni N,Mastromattei A,et al.Pressure ulcer risk in long-term units:Prevalence and associated factors.J Adv Nurs,2007,58(3):263-272.
  • 6Scott JR,Gibran NS,Engrave LH,et al.Incidence and characteristics of hospitalized patients with pressure ulcers:State of Washington,1987 to 2000[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2006,117(2):630-634.
  • 7Gethin G,Jordan-O′Brien J,Moore Z.Estimating costs of pressure ulcer care in one Irish hospital[J].J Wound Care,2005,14(4):162-165.
  • 8Carville K.Wound care manual[M].Osborne Park,Australia:Silver Chain Foundation,2005:82-93.
  • 9Daniel B,Ashkan J.Pressure ulcers:Prevention,evaluation,and management[J].Am Fam Physician,2008,78(10):1186-1194.
  • 10Gardner SE,Franz RA,Bergquist S,et al.A prospective study of the pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH)[J].J Gerontol A Boil Sci Med Sci,2005,60(1):93-97.

共引文献144

同被引文献573

引证文献70

二级引证文献526

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部