摘要
目的探讨新生儿脐动脉血pH值联合1minApgar检测的应用价值。方法选取分娩新生儿206例为研究对象,其中临床诊断胎儿窘迫92例,无胎儿窘迫114例。胎儿娩出后立即行脐动脉血气分析和1minApgar评分,依据是否胎儿窘迫和1minApgar评分分组,并追踪新生儿结局。结果(1)胎儿窘迫组中脐动脉血pH值〈7.20者70例(76.1%),无胎儿窘迫组中为56例(49.1%),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。(2)新生儿1minApgar评分〉7分者中脐动脉血pH值〈7.20者46例(40.4%),而Apgar评分≤7分者中为73例(79.3%),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。(3)脐动脉血气及Apgar评分对新生儿缺血缺氧性脑病(HIE)的预测:HIE发生26例。Apgar评分≤7分对HIE诊断敏感度为88.5%,特异性为61.7%;pH值〈7.20对HIE诊断的敏感度76.9%,特异性45.0%。联合检测对HIE诊断的敏感性为90.5%,特异性为55.0%。结论血气分析是Apgar评分的补充,二者结合能增加对HIE诊断的特异性。
Objective To investigate the clinical value of neonatal umbilical artery blood combined analysis of neonatal umbilical artery blood pH and 1 min Apgar score. Methods 206 cases of newborn were selected as research objects, in which 92 cases with fetal distress and 114 cases with- out fetal distress. Immediate umbilical artery blood gas analysis and 1 minApgar assessments were ap- plied after the childbirth. Neonate were grouped according to diagnosis of fetal distress and 1 minApgar assessments. Results (1) In neonate with fetal distress, 70 cases (76.1%) were detected with um- bilical arterial blood pH 〈 7.20. In those without fetal distress, 56 cases (49.1%) were detected with umbilical arterial blood pH 〈 7.20. there was a significant difference (P 〈 0.01 ). (2) Forty six cases (40.4%) with umbilical artery blood pH 〈 7.20 were observed in those with 1 minApgar score 〉 7 points, and 73 cases (79.3%) were found in those with 1 minApgar seore≤7 points, with a signifi- cant difference (P 〈 0. 01 ). (3) A total of 26 cases were diagnosed with neonatal hypoxic ischemie en- cephalopathy (HIE). The sensitivity and specificity of Apgar score≤7 points for diagnosing HIE was 88.5% and 61.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of pH values 〈 7.20 to HIE were 76. 9% and 45.0%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of combined test to HIE were 90.5% and 55.0%, respectively. Conclusion Blood gas analysis is a supplement to the Apgar score. The combination of two tests can increase the specificity of HIE diagnosis.
出处
《实用临床医药杂志》
CAS
2015年第E01期32-33,共2页
Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice