期刊文献+

替吉奥联合华蟾素片治疗老年晚期胃癌的疗效及安全性 被引量:4

Efficacy and safety of S1 combined with cinobufacin in treating the elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察胃癌晚期不可切除或复发患者使用替吉奥单药化疗联合华蟾素的疗效及安全性。方法晚期胃癌老年患者60例随机分为治疗组和对照组,各30例,治疗组给予替吉奥胶囊联合华蟾素片,对照组给予5-氟尿嘧啶(5-Fu)静脉滴注。结果治疗组和对照组总有效率分别为33.3%(10/30)和20%(6/30),差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);治疗组疾病控制率73.0%(22/30),高于对照组的43.3%(13/30),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。治疗组免疫状态(NK细胞活性)较对照组改善明显,不良反应发生(121腔黏膜、皮疹)情况低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论替吉奥联合华蟾素片对于老年晚期胃癌患者疗效确切,能改善患者免疫状态,并发症相对较少,能减轻患者黏膜及皮肤反应,但仍需大样本、长期随机对照试验进一步验证。 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of S1 combined with cinobufacin in treating the elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods A total of 60 elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent un-resectable gastric cancer were randomized to either control group or treatment group. Treatment group was treated with S-1 plus cinobufacin and control group was treated with intravenous injection of 5-Fu. Results The overall response rate was 33.3% (10/30) in treatment group and 20% (6/30) in control group, with no significant difference (P 〉0.05). Disease control rate was 73.3% (22/30) in treatment group and was 43.3% (13/30), with a significant difference (P 〈 0. 05). compared with the control group , the treatment group received a better outcome of immunity function and less adverse reaction (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion S1 combined with cinobufacin is an poten- tially effective and safe treatment for elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent un-resectable gastric cancer. More evidence will be required from further studies with larger population and longer follow-up.
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2015年第E01期34-36,共3页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词 替吉奥 华蟾素片 晚期胃癌 不良反应 S-1 cinobufacin andvanced gastric cancer adverse reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献31

  • 1Munoz N,Franceschi S.Epidemiology of gastric cancer and perspectives for prevention.Salud Publica Mex 1997;39:318-330.
  • 2Kamangar F,Dores GM,Anderson WF.Patterns of cancer incidence,mortality,and prevalence across five continents:defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world.J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2137-2150.
  • 3Glimelius B,Ekstrom K,Hoffman K,Graf W,Sjodén PO,Haglund U,Svensson C,Enander LK,Linné T,Sellstrom H,Heuman R.Randomized comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer.Ann Oncol 1997;8:163-168.
  • 4Webb A,Cunningham D,Scarffe JH,Harper P,Norman A,Joffe JK,Hughes M,Mansi J,Findlay M,Hill A,Oates J,Nicolson M,Hickish T,O'Brien M,Iveson T,Watson M,Underhill C,Wardley A,Meehan M.Randomized trial comparing epirubicin,cisplatin,and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil,doxorubicin,and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer.J Clin Oncol 1997;15:261-267.
  • 5Wagner AD,Grothe W,Haerting J,Kleber G,Grothey A,Fleig WE.Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data.J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2903-2909.
  • 6Van Cutsem E,Moiseyenko VM,Tjulandin S,Majlis A,Constenla M,Boni C,Rodrigues A,Fodor M,Chao Y,Voznyi E,Risse ML,Ajani JA.Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer:a report of the V325 Study Group.J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4991-4997.
  • 7Cunningham D,Starling N,Rao S,Iveson T,Nicolson M,Coxon F,Middleton G,Daniel F,Oates J,Norman AR.Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer.N Engl J Med 2008;358:36-46.
  • 8Kang Y,Kang WK,Shin DB,Chen J,Xiong J,Wang J,Lichinitser M,Salas MP,Suarez T,Santamaria J.Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine/cisplatin (XP) vs.continuous infusion of 5-FU/cisplatin (FP) as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer (AGC):efficacy and safety results.Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of American Society of Clinical Oncology;2006 June 1-5;Chicago,USA.Alexandria:American Society of Clinical Oncology,2006:18s.
  • 9Koizumi W,Narahara H,Hara T,Takagane A,Akiya T,Takagi M,Miyashita K,Nishizaki T,Kobayashi O,Takiyama W,Toh Y,Nagaie T,Takagi S,Yamamura Y,Yanaoka K,Orita H,Takeuchi M.S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial):a phase III trial.Lancet Oncol 2008;9:215-221.
  • 10Ajani JA,Rodriguez W,Bodoky G,Moiseyenko V,Lichinitser M,Gorbunova V,Vynnychenko I,Garin A,Lang I,Falcon S.Multicenter phase III comparison of cisplatin/S-1 (CS) with cisplatin/5-FU (CF) as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (FLAGS).Presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium;2009 January 15-17;San Francisco,USA.

共引文献61

同被引文献75

引证文献4

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部