期刊文献+

丙泊酚复合七氟烷对小儿麻醉苏醒期躁动效果探索和研究

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析丙泊酚复合七氟烷应用于小儿麻醉苏醒期躁动的临床效果。方法:选取2013年4月至2015年1月期间我院行常规手术麻醉的68例患儿进行研究.将其按照抛硬币法分为对照组(n=32)和研究组(n=36),对照组予以七氟烷吸入麻醉,研究组在对照组的基础上联合丙泊酚吸入麻醉,比较两组患儿的临床麻醉效果。结果:对照纽患儿躁动的发生率为22%高于研究组患儿蹂动的发生率6%,研究组患儿清醒时间为(208±4.3)min长于对照组患儿清醒时间(159±4.3)min,组间比较,P〈0.05。结论:丙泊酚复合七氟烷可以降低小儿躁动的发生率,延长小儿的清醒时间,效果明显,具有临床应用价值,值得推广。 Objective: To analyze propofol combined with sevoflurane anesthesia applied to pediatric clinical effect of restlessness. Method : from April 2013 to January 2015 in our hospital 68 cases during routine anesthesia in children were studied, which according to the coin toss divided into control group ( n = 32) and study group ( n = 36) the control group received sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia, the study group inhaled anesthetic propofol on the basis of the control group to compare two groups of children in clinical anesthesia. Results : The incidence of restless children group was 22% higher than in children Study Group 6% incidence of agitation, the children awake time of the study group (20. 8±4. 3 ) rain longer than the control group, the children awake time ( 15.9± 4. 3 ) min, between the two groups, P 〈0. 05. Conclusion: propofol combined sevoflurane can reduce the inci- dence of restless children, extend the children's waking hours, the effect is obvious, specific clinical applications. Is worth promoting.
作者 李佳蔓
出处 《医学与社会》 2015年第B06期97-97,共1页 Medicine and Society
关键词 丙泊酚 七氟烷 小儿 麻醉苏醒期躁动 临床效果 propofol sevoflurane children anesthesia restlessness clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献37

  • 1刘瑶,曾群英.喉罩技术七氟醚-N_2O吸入麻醉和异丙酚-氯胺酮静脉麻醉在小儿斜视矫正术中应用的比较[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2006,31(1):97-99. 被引量:4
  • 2Oberer C,von Ungern-Sternberg BS,Frei FJ,et al.Respiratory reflex responses of the larynx differ between sevoflurane and propofol in pediatric patients[J].Anesthesiology,2005,103(6):1142-1148.
  • 3Uezono S,Goto T,Terui K,et al.Emergence agitation after sevoflurane versus propofol in pediatric patients[J].Anesth Analg,2000,91(3):563-566.
  • 4Sahar MS,Maie T,Samar K,et al.A comparison of sevoflurane-propofol versus sevoflurane or propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults[J].Anesth Analg,2005,100(5):1204-1209.
  • 5Lopéz GM,Brimacombe J,Clar B.Sevoflurane versus propofol for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia with the laryngeal mask airway in children[J].Paediatr Anaesth,1999,9(6):485-490.
  • 6Ira TC,Juliac F,Raafat S,et al.Rapid emergence does not explain agitation following sevoflurane anaesthesia in infants and children:a comparison with propofol[J].Paediatr Anaesth,2003,13(1):63-67.
  • 7Kataria BK,Ved SA,Nicodemus HF,et al.The pharmacokinetics of propofol in children using three different data analysis approaches[J].Anaesthesiology,1994,80(1):104-122.
  • 8Lerman J,Davis PJ,Welborn LG,et al.Induction,recovery,and safety characteristics of sevoflurane in children undergoing ambulatory surgery[J].Anesthesiology,1996,84(6):1332-1340.
  • 9Duffy CM,Matta BF.Sevoflurane and anesthesia for neurosurgery[J].Neurosurg Anesthesiol,2000,12(2):128-140.
  • 10Voepel-Lewis T,Malviya S,Tait AR.A prospective cohort study of emergence agitation the pediatric postanesthesia care unit[J].Anesth Analg,2003,96(6):1625-1630.

共引文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部