期刊文献+

Aristotle's Immovable Movers: A Sketch

Aristotle's Immovable Movers: A Sketch
原文传递
导出
摘要 In keeping with a view that is explicitly formulated by Aristotle in his Motion of Animals, general kinetic principles must be specified according to the different types of movable entities existing in the universe. At issue, essentially, are the motions of the stars and the motions of animals. Whereas the cosmological immovable mover is the object of two complementary analyses (in Bk. Ⅷ of Physics and in Chs. 6 and 7 of Bk. Ⅻ of Metaphysics), information on the immovability of the first mover responsible for animal motion is to be found in the psychological and psycho-physiological treatises (On the Soul, in Bk. Ⅰ, Chs. 3 and 4, and in Bk. Ⅲ, Ch. 10 and in Ch. 6 of the Motion of Animals). But it is also found in Ch. 7, Bk. Ⅻ of the Metaphysics, in the very context of the argument concerning the absolutely first immovable mover of the world. This suggests that the two types of motion, that of the stars and that of animals, however distinct the arguments about them are, rest on a single scheme, and maybe even on a common principle. This is liable to surprise us, as much as stars and animals appear to us to belong to heterogeneous orders of reality. But the situation is different for Aristotle, who, as attentive as he is to differences, tends nonetheless to conceive the stars as living things of a particular kind. This fact is the source of a series of difficulties that Aristotle generously left for his many commentators to solve. Aim of this text, which was initially directed to a larger audience, is to set some of these complex issues in both simple and up to date terms. In keeping with a view that is explicitly formulated by Aristotle in his Motion of Animals, general kinetic principles must be specified according to the different types of movable entities existing in the universe. At issue, essentially, are the motions of the stars and the motions of animals. Whereas the cosmological immovable mover is the object of two complementary analyses (in Bk. Ⅷ of Physics and in Chs. 6 and 7 of Bk. Ⅻ of Metaphysics), information on the immovability of the first mover responsible for animal motion is to be found in the psychological and psycho-physiological treatises (On the Soul, in Bk. Ⅰ, Chs. 3 and 4, and in Bk. Ⅲ, Ch. 10 and in Ch. 6 of the Motion of Animals). But it is also found in Ch. 7, Bk. Ⅻ of the Metaphysics, in the very context of the argument concerning the absolutely first immovable mover of the world. This suggests that the two types of motion, that of the stars and that of animals, however distinct the arguments about them are, rest on a single scheme, and maybe even on a common principle. This is liable to surprise us, as much as stars and animals appear to us to belong to heterogeneous orders of reality. But the situation is different for Aristotle, who, as attentive as he is to differences, tends nonetheless to conceive the stars as living things of a particular kind. This fact is the source of a series of difficulties that Aristotle generously left for his many commentators to solve. Aim of this text, which was initially directed to a larger audience, is to set some of these complex issues in both simple and up to date terms.
作者 André Laks
出处 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》 2015年第2期273-286,共14页 中国哲学前沿(英文版)
关键词 ARISTOTLE immovable movers final cause efficient cause SOUL animal motion Aristotle, immovable movers, final cause, efficient cause, soul, animal motion
  • 相关文献

参考文献85

  • 1Aubry, G. 2006. Dieu sans la puissance. "Dunamis "' et "'Energeia" chez Aristote et chez Plotin (God without Power. "Dunamis "and "Energeia" at Aristotle and Plotinus). Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
  • 2Berti, E. 2000. "I1 movimento del cielo in Alessandro di Afrodisia" (The Movement of the Sky in Alexander of Aphrodisias), in La filosofia in et& imperiale: Le scuole e le tradizioni filosofiche (The Philosophy in the Imperial Age: Schools and Philosophical Traditions), edited by A. Brancacci, 225-43. Napoli: Bibliopolis.
  • 3Berti, E. 2000b. "Metaphysics Lambda 6," in Frede, M. & Charles, D.: 181-206.
  • 4Berti, E. 2007. "Ancora sulla causalit~ del motore immobile" (Still on the Causality of the Unmoved Mover). Methexis 20: 7-28.
  • 5Berti, E. 2008a. "Le rapport entre cause motrice et cause finale dans la M~taphysique d'Aristote" (The Ratio between Motor and Final Cause in Aristotle's Metaphysics). Dialectique, physique et m~taphysique. Etudes sur Aristote (Dialectics, physics and metaphysics. Studies Aristotle), 441-69. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.
  • 6Berti, E. 2008b. "La cause du mouvement dans les 6tres vivants" (The Cause of the Movement in Living Beings). Dialectique, physique et mgtaphysique. Etudes sur Aristote, 469-83. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters. (also in Ancients perspectives on Aristotle's De anima, edited by G. van Riel and P. Destree, 141-53. Leuven University Press. 2009.).
  • 7Berti, E. 2012. "The Finality of Aristotle's Unmoved Mover in the Metaphysics Book 12, Chapters 7 and 10." Nova et Vetera, English Edition, 10, N3:863-76 (="La finalith del motore immobile di Aristote letra Metaph. Lambda 7 e Lambda 10, Humanitas, 46, 2011, 555-67).
  • 8Bradshaw, D. 2001. "A New Look at the First Mover." Journal of the History of Philosophy, XXXIX. 1: 1-22.
  • 9Broadie, S. 1993. "Que fait le Premier Moteurd'Aristote? Sur la th6ologie du livre Lambda de la Metaphysique" (What Does the Prime Moteurd'Aristote? On the Theology of the Book Lambda of the Metaphysics). Revue Philosophique 143:375-411.
  • 10Fazzo, S. 2008. "L'exegese du livre Lambda de la Metaphysique d'Aristote dans le De principiis et la Quaestio 1.1. d'Alexandre d'Aphrodise." Laval theologique et philosophique 64: 607-24.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部