期刊文献+

The Chinese Stock Markets on Trial: The Fat Finger Accident of Everbright Securities

The Chinese Stock Markets on Trial: The Fat Finger Accident of Everbright Securities
原文传递
导出
摘要 Everbright Securities Ltd. erroneously submitted huge quantities of buy orders on SSE180 constituent stocks from 11:05 through 11:07 on 16 August 2013. This fat finger accident had a pronounced impact on the Chinese stock markets. This paper uses the accident to study market quality and investors' responses. We show that the Chinese stock markets were robust enough to stand the trial, exhibiting deep depths and strong resiliency. However, the markets performed poorly in terms of aggregating information because there were large price swings after the erroneous orders were executed. Moreover, investors quickly change their beliefs as to the reasons to the dramatic price jumps, consistent with information cascade theory. Everbright Securities Ltd. erroneously submitted huge quantities of buy orders on SSE180 constituent stocks from 11:05 through 11:07 on 16 August 2013. This fat finger accident had a pronounced impact on the Chinese stock markets. This paper uses the accident to study market quality and investors' responses. We show that the Chinese stock markets were robust enough to stand the trial, exhibiting deep depths and strong resiliency. However, the markets performed poorly in terms of aggregating information because there were large price swings after the erroneous orders were executed. Moreover, investors quickly change their beliefs as to the reasons to the dramatic price jumps, consistent with information cascade theory.
出处 《Frontiers of Business Research in China》 2015年第2期243-267,共25页 中国高等学校学术文摘·工商管理研究(英文版)
基金 We gratefully acknowledge the support by National Natural Science Foundation of China through grants 71202146 and 71402028. We thank the Executive Editor-in-Chief and two anonymous referees for helpful comments.
关键词 Everbright fat finger accident market efficiency market quality information cascade Everbright fat finger accident, market efficiency, market quality,information cascade
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Ahn, H.-J., Cai, J., Hamao, Y. & Ho, R. Y. K. 2005. Adverse selection, brokerage coverage, and trading activity on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(6): 1483-1508.
  • 2Alevy, J. E., Haigh, M. S. & List, J. A. 2007. Information cascades: Evidence from a field experiment with financial market professionals. The Journal of Finance, 62(1): 151 - 180.
  • 3Booth, G,G. & Gurun, U. G. 2008. Volatility clustering and the bid-ask spread: exchange rate behavior in early renaiss ance Florence. Journal of Empirical Finance, 15 (1): 131-144.
  • 4Boulatov, A. & George, T. J. 2013. Hidden and displayed liquidity in securities markets with informed liquidity providers. Review of Financial Studies, 26(8): 2096-2137.
  • 5Cao, H. H., Han, B. & Hirshleifer, D. 2011. Taking the road less traveled by: Does conversation eradicate pernicious cascades? Journal of Economic Theory, 146(4): 1418-1436.
  • 6Eom, K. S., Ok, J. & Park, J.-H. 2007. Pre-trade transparency and market quality. Journal of Financial Markets, 10(4): 319-341.
  • 7Foucault, T., Kadan, O. & Kandel, E. 2005. Limit order book as a market for liquidity. Review of Financial Studies, 18(4): 1171-1217.
  • 8Hendershott, T. & Riordan, R. 2013. Algorithmic trading and the market for liquidity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(04): 1001-1024.
  • 9Hendershott, T., Jones, C. M. & Menkveld, A. J. 2011. Does algorithmic trading improve liquidity? The Journal of Finance, 66(1): 1-33.
  • 10Huang, R. D. & Stoll, H. R. 2001. Tick size, bid-ask spreads, and market structure. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36(4): 503-522.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部