期刊文献+

脉冲射频治疗骶髂关节疼痛疗效分析 被引量:2

Analysis of the Efficacy of Pulsed Radiofrequency in the Treatment of Sacral Pain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨脉冲射频技术治疗难治性骶髂关节疼痛的疗效。方法对13例应用脉冲射频技术方法治疗的难治性骶髂关节疼痛患者,随访半年后,记录其术后2周、出院后1个月、3个月、6个月时的疼痛缓解程度及并发症,以及患者对治疗效果的满意度。结果术后2周患者疼痛不同程度缓解,优良率100%,但随着时间延长,大部分患者不同程度复发,6个月后优良率只有46.2%;患者对治疗效果满意度为97.3%。结论脉冲射频治疗短期内可显著降骶髂关节疼痛,部分患者疗效可靠,满意度达标,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate the effect of pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of intractable sacral pain. Methods 13 cases of application of pulsed RF technologies in the treatment of refractory sacroiliac joint pain,after six months of follow- up,record the postoperative 2 weeks and discharged after 1 month,3 months,6 months of pain relief degree and complications,and patients on therapeutic effect of satisfaction. Results Postoperative 2 weeks of pain in patients with different degrees of ease,the excellent and good rate was 100%,but with the extension of time,most of the patients with different degree of recurrence,after 6 months,the excellent and good rate was only 46. 2%; patients satisfaction with treatment effect was 97. 3%. Conclusion The short term of pulse radiofrequency can significantly reduce the pain of the patients with the pain of the sacral joint,the curative effect is reliable,the satisfaction degree is up to standard,and it is worthy of clinical popularization and application.
机构地区 粤北人民医院
出处 《广东微量元素科学》 CAS 2015年第7期52-55,共4页 Trace Elements Science
基金 2014年度韶关市医学科研基金立项课题(Y14049)
关键词 骶髂关节 脉冲射频 射频 疗效 sacral joint pulsed RF RF effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1STEVEN P C, YIAN C, NATHAN J. Neufeld, Sacroiliac joint pain : a comprehensive review of epidemiology,diagnosis & treatment [J]. Expert Rev Neurother, 2013, 13(1) : 99 -116.
  • 2GEVARGEZ A , GROENEMEYER D, SCHIRP S, et al. CT - guided percutaneous radiofrequency denervation of thesacroiliac joint [J]. Eur Radiol, 2002, 12(6): 1360-1365.
  • 3CHUA N H, VISSERS K C, SLUIJTER M E. Pulsed radiofrequency treatment in interventional pain management:mechanisms and potential indications - a review [J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien) , 2011, 153 : 763 -771.
  • 4KROLL H R, KIM D, DANIC M J, et al. A randomized, double - blind, prospective study comparing the efficacy ofcontinuous versus pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of lumbar facet syndrome [J]. J Clin Anesth, 2008, 20(7): 534-537.
  • 5TEKIN I, MIRZAI H, OK G, et al. A comparison of conventional and pulsed radiofrequency denervation in thetreatment of chronic facet joint pain [J]. Clin J Pain, 2007 , 23(6) , 524 - 529.
  • 6VALLEJO R, BENYAMIN R M, KRAMER J, et al. Pulsed radiofrequency denervation for the treatment of sacroiliacjoint syndrome [J]. Pain Med, 2006, 7 ( 5 ): 429-434.
  • 7SPELDEWINDE G C. Outcomes of percutaneous zygapophysial and sacroiliac joint neurotomy in a community setting[J]. Pain Med, 2011, 12(2): 209-218.
  • 8KARAMAN H, KAVAK G 0, TUFEK A , et al. Cooled radiofrequency application for treatment of sacroiliac jointpain [J]. Acta Neurochir( Wien), 2011, 153 (7) : 1461 - 1468.
  • 9PATEL N, GROSS A , BROWN L, et al. A randomized, placebo - controlled study to assess the efficacy of lateralbranch neurotomy for chronic sacroiliac joint pain [J]. PainMed, 2012, 13(3) : 383 -398.
  • 10CHENG J, POPE J E, DALTON J E, et al. Comparative outcomes of cooled versus traditional radiofrequencyablation of the lateral branches for sacroiliac joint pain [J]. Clin J Pain, 2013 , 29: 132 - 137.

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部