医学会开展“三期”鉴定的可行性

To Carry out Three- Phase Identification Feasibility by The Medical Association

目的分析医疗损害赔偿纠纷案件诉讼周期过长的原因,完善医疗损害鉴定机制,将"三期"鉴定纳入医学会的鉴定范围,可大大缩短鉴定时限,进而解决诉讼周期过长问题。方法采用一般统计描述方法,选取笔者所在地区一所三甲医院2010年7月1日至2014年6月30日的33例鉴定及诉讼医疗纠纷案例进行回顾性分析。结果本组全部案例中,未处理终结的有13例;已处理终结的有20例,其中平均处理时间最短6.8月,最长32.7月。进行医疗损害鉴定的有29例,省市鉴定累计42次,有法医主任参与的占95.24%。结论医学会开展"三期"鉴定是必要和可行。

Objective The reasons were analyzed of long litigation period in medical injury compensation disputes, and the countermeasures were proposed as setting new medical injury identification mechanism, in which three - phase identification were brought into the medical association identification scope, thus to reduce the time of identification. Methods 33 cases of identification and medical malpractice litigation was analyzed from 2010 July 1 to 2014 June 30, occurred in a tertiary hospitals with the retrospective analysis. Results Of 33 cases, only 20 cases were terminated, of which the shortest processing time was 6.8 months, and the longest was 32.7 months. There are 29 cases of medical damage identification, the provincial and municipal identification was 42 times, the forensic director accounted for 95.24%. Conclusion To carry out three - phase identification by medical association is necessary and feasible.