尿液分析法和显微镜手工分析法在尿常规检查中的价值

The Value of Urine Analytical Approach and Microscopic Manual Analytical Approach in Routine Urine Test

目的：对尿液分析法和显微镜手工分析法在尿常规检查中的价值进行评价分析，为今后的临床检验工作提供可靠的参考依据。方法选取2013年1月～2014年12月我院收治的接受尿常规检查人群260例，分别展开尿液分析法和显微镜手工分析法进行检查，并对两种检查方法的检查结果进行对比分析。结果本组260份尿液标本经尿液分析法阳性187份，阴性73份，假阳性率0.77%，假阴性4.61%；显微镜手工分析法阳性156份，阴性104份，假阳性率8.08%，假阴性率18.08%，P＜0.05，差异具有统计学意义。结论尿液分析法和显微镜手工法在尿常规检测中均具有重要价值。

Objective evaluation analysis the value of urine analytical approach and microscopic manual analytical approach in routine urine test to provide a reliable reference for future clinical inspection work. Methods Selected 260 cases who accepted urinalysis from January 2013 to December 2014 in our hospital, respectively check their urine analytical approach and manual microscopic analytical approach, contrastive analyzed the test results of the two methods. Results 260 urine samples were 187 positive urine analysis, negative 73, false positive rate was 0.77%, false negative 4.61%;manual microscopic analysis of positive 156, 104 copies of negative, false positive rate was 8.08%, false negative rate was18.08%, P〈0.05, had difference statistically signiifcance. Conclusion Urine analytical approach and microscopic manual analytical approach in the detection of urine are of great value.