期刊文献+

结直肠癌K-ras基因突变两种检测方法的比较及临床相关性分析 被引量:1

Comparison of two methods for the detection of K-ras mutations in colorectal cancer and correlation with clinical characteristics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较ARMS法和Sanger测序法在检测K-ras基因突变时的敏感性、一致性和特异性,并且探讨结直肠癌患者K-ras基因突变与临床病理特性的相关性。方法采用ARMS法和Sanger测序法对200例结直肠癌患者进行K-ras基因突变检测。结果 ARMS法检出K-ras基因突变75例,阳性率为37.50%。Sanger测序法检出K-ras基因突变72例,阳性率为36.00%。两种方法的符合率为96%。同时,K-ras基因突变与淋巴结转移具有相关性(P<0.05),与患者年龄、性别、肿瘤部位、分化程度、肝转移和肿瘤类型均无相关性(P>0.05)。结论 K-ras基因突变检测有助于筛选靶向治疗有效的结直肠癌患者。ARMS法更适用于临床检测。 Objective To compare the ARMS method and Sanger sequencing method in detection of K-ras gene mutation of sensitivity,consistency and specificity,and to explore the relationship between K-ras gene mutation and the clinical pathological characteristics. Methods In 200 cases of colorectal cancer,K-ras gene mutations were detected by ARMS method and Sanger sequencing method. Results K-ras gene mutation was found in 75 cases by ARMS method,the positive rate was 37. 50%,while 72 cases by Sanger sequencing method,which positive rate was 36%. The coincidence rate of the two methods was 96%. At the same time,the mutation of K-ras gene had correlation with lymph node metastasis( P〈0. 05),and had no correlation with patient age,gender,tumor location,differentiation degree,liver metastasis and tumor type( P〉0. 05). Conclusion Detection of K-ras gene mutation contributes to the selection of targeted and effective in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. The ARMS method is more suitable for clinical detection.
出处 《哈尔滨医科大学学报》 CAS 2015年第3期232-235,共4页 Journal of Harbin Medical University
基金 黑龙江省卫生计生委科研课题(2014-713)
关键词 ARMS法 Sanger测序法 K-RAS基因突变 ARMS method Sanger sequencing method K-ras gene mutation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献29

  • 1郭晓强.自动测序仪的发明者——记科学家胡德[J].生物学通报,2005,40(6):58-59. 被引量:3
  • 2李连弟,鲁凤珠.1990—1992年中国恶性肿瘤死亡流行分布情况分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1996,18(6):403-407. 被引量:227
  • 3李连弟,鲁凤珠,张思维,牧人,孙秀娣,皇甫小梅,孙杰,周有尚,欧阳宁慧,饶克勤,陈育德,孙爱明,薛志福,夏毅.中国恶性肿瘤死亡率20年变化趋势和近期预测分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1997,19(1):3-9. 被引量:869
  • 4Jonker DJ,O'Callaghan CJ,Karapetis CS,et al.Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2007,357(20):2040-2048.
  • 5Cunningham D,Humblet Y,Siena S,et al.Cetuximab monotherapy and Cetuximab plus Irinotecan in Irinotecanrefractory metastatic colorectal cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2004,351(4):337-345.
  • 6Sobrero AF,Maurel J,Fehrenbacher L,et al.EPIC:Phase Ⅲ trial of Cetuximab plus Irinotecan after Fluoropyrimidine and Oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(14):2311-2319.
  • 7van Cutsem E,Nowacki M,Lang I,et al.Randomized phase Ⅲ study of Irintoecan and 5-FU/FA with or without Cetuximab in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC):The CRYSTAL trial(abstract)[J].J Clin Oncol,2007,25:164s.
  • 8Bokemeyer C,Bondarenko I,Hartmann JT,et al.K-RAS status and efficacy of first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with FOLFOX with or without Cetuximab:The OPUS experience (abstract)[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26:178s.
  • 9van Cutsem E,Kǒhne CH,Hitre E,et al.Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2009,360(14):1408-1417.
  • 10Sanger F, Niclden S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-ter- minating inhibitors [ J ].Proc Natl Acad Sci, 1977,74 ( 12 ) :5463 - 5467.

共引文献370

同被引文献17

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部