期刊文献+

城市生活垃圾填埋处置社会成本核算方法与应用——以北京市为例 被引量:20

Social cost accounting for solid waste landfill disposal in Beijing
原文传递
导出
摘要 生活垃圾处置社会成本核算能够为管理决策提供基本的成本信息,纠正对城市生活垃圾管理认识的偏差,是实施垃圾减量化、加强成本监管的重要依据。基于城市生活垃圾管理的环节,文中界定了生活垃圾处置的社会成本,并提出了基于市场价格的成本核算方法,估算了北京市生活垃圾卫生填埋的全社会成本。结果表明:(1)2012年,北京市的生活垃圾填埋处置社会成本达1530.7元/吨;(2)收集成本所占比例高达59.1%,远超过中间转运(13.3%)和末端处置(27.6%)成本;(3)土地成本占比达21.4%,垃圾处置占用的土地资源不容忽视。基于此,提出优化生活垃圾处置成本结构、降低成本;探索生活垃圾减量化手段;建立生活垃圾成本核算制度,定期核算并公开成本信息等建议。 Social cost accounting for municipal solid waste disposal can provide basic cost information for management decisions and correct the cognitive deviation on solid waste management. It is also an important foundation for implementing municipal solid waste reduction and strengthening supervision of the public on cost reduction. Based on household waste management processes,we defined the social cost of municipal solid waste disposal distinctly and specifies cost accounting method based on marketing price; then we estimated municipal solid waste social cost in Beijing empirically. The results show that Beijing's social cost of household waste landfill disposal reached 1530. 7 Yuan per ton in 2012. The cost percentage of collecting accounted to 59. 1%,far exceeding the intermediate transferring cost( 13. 3%) and terminal sanitary landfill cost( 27. 6%). The cost of land resource shared a proportion of 21. 4%,which was not supposed to be neglected. Based on the above analysis,we put forward following suggestions: optimizing the social cost structure of household waste and cutting the cost,exploring measures of reducing the amount of municipal solid waste,establishing municipal solid waste cost accounting policy,and then accounting cost regularly and making it available publicly.
出处 《干旱区资源与环境》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第8期57-63,共7页 Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
基金 中国人民大学科学研究基金项目重大基础研究计划(编号:12XNL005)资助
关键词 生活垃圾 社会成本 核算方法 北京市 municipal solid waste social cost accounting method Beijing city
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1杜倩倩,马本.城市生活垃圾计量收费实施依据和定价思路[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(8):20-25. 被引量:8
  • 2聂永有,王振坤.公共产品供给民营化背景下的政府规制研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(1):167-172. 被引量:8
  • 3张越,鲁明中.城市生活垃圾收费政策的经济学分析[J].环境科学动态,2005(1):46-47. 被引量:14
  • 4Karagiannidis A,Xirogiannopoulou A,Tchobanoglous G.Full cost accounting as a tool for the financial assessment of Pay-As-You-Throw schemes:A case study for the Panorama municipality,Greece[J].Waste Management,2008,28(12):2801-2808.
  • 5Lohri C R,Camenzind E J,Zurbrügg C.Financial sustainability in municipal solid waste management-Costs and revenues in Bahir Dar,Ethiopia[J].Waste Management,2014,34(2):542-552.
  • 6Debnath S,Bose S K.Exploring full cost accounting approach to evaluate cost of MSW services in India[J].Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2014,83:87-95.
  • 7Kinnaman T C.Determining the socially optimal recycling rate[J].Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2014,85(1):5-10.
  • 8Fiorucci P,Minciardi R,Robba M,et al.Solid waste management in urban areas:development and application of a decision support system[J].Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2003,37(4):301-328.
  • 9Costi P,Minciardi R,Robba M,et al.An environmentally sustainable decision model for urban solid waste management[J].Waste Management,2004,24(3):277-295.
  • 10El-Hamouz A M.Logistical management and private sector involvement in reducing the cost of municipal solid waste collection service in the Tubas area of the West Bank[J].Waste Management,2008,28(2):260-271.

二级参考文献124

共引文献1046

同被引文献180

引证文献20

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部