期刊文献+

二级准直器在鼻咽癌容积调强放射治疗计划设计中的应用研究 被引量:4

Application of Liner-accelerator Two-degrade Collimator in the Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较治疗计划系统二级准直器(MLC)角度选择对容积调强放射治疗(VMAT)计划质量与运行效率的影响,探索治疗计划设计的优化方案。方法随机选取2013年3月-12月治疗的20例鼻咽癌患者,设定不同的MLC角度,进行同步加量的VMAT逆向计划设计,比较MLC角度对靶区和危及器官剂量分布、机器输出跳数的差异。MLC角度分别设置为0、15、30、45、60°。结果随着MLC角度增大,靶区适形指数和均匀性指数有变差的趋势,0°和15°计划相对最优,45°和60°计划对危机器官的保护不如其他角度好而且机器跳数明显增加。结论改变MLC角度对治疗计划会产生明显影响,随MLC角度增加,计划质量与运行效率均有变差的趋势,但是小范围改变MLC角度理论上可以降低漏射线对人体的影响。 Objective Compare the two-degrade collimator(MLC) angle selection's impact on plan quality and operational efficiency for volumetric intensity-modulated radiotherapy(VMAT) in the treatment planning system,and to explore the scheme for treatment plan optimization.Methods Twenty patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma underwent the treatment between March and December 2013 were randomly selected and planned for SIB-VMAT treatment with different parameters set in the range of 0- 60° with 15° interval for collimator angles.Planned dose distribution to the target volumes,organs at risk,and monitor units were compared.Results As the MLC angle increased,target conformal index and homogeneity index had a trend to became deteriorated.The optimal plans were 0° and 15°,while 45° and 60° plans gave poor protection for the organ at risk compare to other angle plans and the monitor units were significantly increased.Conclusion Change the MLC angle had visible impact on treatment plans,there was a trend to deteriorate with the MLC angle increased,but small changes in MLC angle range can theoretically reduce the influence from leakage radiation on the human body.
出处 《华西医学》 CAS 2015年第7期1235-1238,共4页 West China Medical Journal
关键词 二级准直器 鼻咽癌 容积调强放射治疗 Two-degrade collimator Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Volumetric intensity-modulated radiotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Bedford JL, Warrington AP. Commissioning of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2009, 73(2): 537-545.
  • 2Bedford JL. Treatment planning for volumetric modulated arc therapy[J]. Med Phys, 2009, 36(11): 5128-5138.
  • 3Otto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc[J]. Med Phys, 2008, 35(1): 310-317.
  • 4Treutwein M, Hipp M, Koelbl O, et al. Searching standard parameters for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of prostate cancer[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2012, 7: 108.
  • 5Kuijper IT, Dahele M, Senan S, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy for stereotactic spine radiotherapy: a planning study and early clinical data[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2010, 94(2): 224-228.
  • 6赵充,卢泰祥,韩非,卢丽霞,黄劭敏,邓小武,林承光,崔念基.139例鼻咽癌调强放疗的临床研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(1):1-6. 被引量:154
  • 7ICRU. Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)[J]. J ICRU, 2010, 10(1): 34-36.
  • 8Feuvret L, No?l G, Mazeron JJ, et al. Conformity index: a review[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006, 64(2): 333-342.
  • 9Lee TF, Chao PJ, Ting HM, et al. Comparative analysis of SmartArc-based dual arc volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2011, 12(4): 3587.
  • 10Rao M, Yang W, Chen F, et al. Comparison of Elekta VMAT with helical tomotherapy and fixed field IMRT: plan quality, delivery efficiency and accuracy[J]. Med Phys, 2010, 37(3): 1350-1359.

二级参考文献33

共引文献162

同被引文献55

  • 1Louis P,Gaspar LE,Brian K,et al.American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) and American College of Radiology (ACR) practice guidelines for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT)[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2010,76(2):319-325.
  • 2Nelms BE,Simon JA.A survey on planar IMRT QA analysis[J].J Appl Clin Med Phys,2007,8(3):2448.
  • 3Caivano R,Califano G,Fiorentino A,et al.Clinically relevant quality assurance for intensity modulated radiotherapy plans:gamma maps and DVH-based evaluation[J].Cancer Invest,2014,32(3):85-91.
  • 4Nakaguchi Y,Araki F,Ono T,et al.Validation of a quick three-dimensional dose verification system for pre-treatment IMRT QA[J].Radiol Phys Technol,2015,8(1):1-8.
  • 5Reynolds M,Fallone BG,Rathee S.Dose response of selected ion chambers in applied homogeneous transverse and longitudinal magnetic fields[J].Med Phys,2013,40(4):042102.
  • 6Zhen H,Nelms BE,Tome WA.Moving from gamma passing rates to patient DVH-based QA metrics in pretreatment dose QA[J].Med Phys,2011,38(10):5477-5489.
  • 7Low DA,Harms WB,Mutic S,et al.A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions[J].Med Phys,1998,25(5):656-661.
  • 8Kn??s T,Wieslander E,Cozzi L,et al.Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external photon beam therapy for clinical situations[J].Phys Med Biol,2006,51(22):5785-5807.
  • 9Takahashi W,Yamashita H,Saotome N,et al.Evaluation of heterogeneity dose distributions for stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT):comparison of commercially available Monte Carlo dose calculation with other algorithms[J].Radiat Oncol,2012,7(7):20-27.
  • 10Hasenbalg F,Neuenschwander H,Mini R,et al.Collapsed cone convolution and analytical anisotropic algorithm dose calculations compared to VMC++ Monte Carlo simulations in clinical cases[J].Phys Med Biol,2007,52(13):3679-3691.

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部