期刊文献+

山东临沂地区下呼吸道感染患者卡他布兰汉菌耐药性分析及bro基因分型检测 被引量:4

Antibiotic resistance and bro genotyping of Branhemella catarrhalis isolated from patients with lower respiratory tract infections in Linyi, Shandong province
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析山东临沂地区下呼吸道感染患者痰液样本中分离的卡他布兰汉菌对常用抗菌药物的耐药性及bro基因分型对耐药性的影响。方法连续收集2010年1月至2014年12月山东省临沂市人民医院镜检合格的下呼吸道感染患者痰液样本,将其分别划线接种于4块不同琼脂培养基进行细菌分离培养及鉴定。对分离出的卡他布兰汉菌进行药敏试验和β-内酰胺酶检测,同时采用PCR扩增结合限制性内切酶分析法对分离株进行bro基因分型。采用χ^2检验比较不同bro基因型菌株对抗菌药物的耐药率。结果5年来共分离出497株卡他布兰汉菌,以冬季检出最多(共221株)。所有菌株对厄他培南和氯霉素完全敏感,对阿莫西林/克拉维酸和头孢呋辛耐药率较低(≤2.8%),对复方磺胺甲噁唑、红霉素和氨苄西林的耐药率较高,为47.6%-89.8%,且呈逐年增加趋势,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。共检出产β-内酰胺酶卡他布兰汉菌412株(412/497,82.9%),均为bro基因阳性菌株,bro基因阳性菌株对红霉素、复方磺胺甲噁唑、左氧氟沙星和氨苄西林的耐药率均高于bro阴性菌株(χ^2=12.16、16.18、8.41和200.00,P<0.05)。经bro基因分型发现,bro-1型菌株占94.9%(391/412),bro-2型菌株占5.1%(21/412),bro-1型与bro-2型菌株对常用抗菌药物的耐药率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论临床分离卡他布兰汉菌产β-内酰胺酶阳性率较高,且多为bro-1型阳性株。菌株对碳青霉烯类抗菌药物、头孢菌素及β-内酰胺酶抑制剂敏感率较高,可作为治疗呼吸道卡他布兰汉菌感染的首选。 Objective To analyze the antibiotic resistance of Branhemella catarrhalis strains isolated from sputum specimens of patients with lower respiratory tract infections from Linyi, Shandong Province, and to explore the relationship between bro genotypes of the strains and their resistance to antibiotic agents.Methods Sputum specimens were colleted from the patients with lower respiratory tract infections in Linyi People ’ s Hospital from the January 2010 to December 2014.The specimens were inoculated into 4 different disks for bacterial isolation and cultivation.β-lactamase detection and drug sensitivity tests were performed, and PCR coupled with restriction endonuclease analysis was employed for bro genotyping.χ^2 test was used to compare drug resistance of strains with different bro genotypes.Results A total of 497 Branhemella catarrhalis strains were isolated in five years, among which 221 strains were isolated in winter.All strains were sensitive to ertapenem and chloramphenicol, and the resistance rates to amoxicillin/clavulanate and cefaclor were low (≤2.8%).The strains were highly resistant to compound sulfamethoxazole, erythromycin and ampicillin (47.6%-89.8%), and there was a trend of increasing resistance rates with the year, but no statistically significant difference was observed ( P 〉0.05 ) .β-lactamases was positive in 412 strains (82.9%), and all of these strains were positive for bro gene, and the resistances to erythromycin, compound sulfamethoxazole, levofloxacin and ampicillin were higher in bro positive strains than those in bro negative strains (χ^2 =12.16, 16.18, 8.41 and 200.00,P〈0.05).Among bro positive strains, 391 (94.9%) were of genotype bro-1, 21 (5.1%) were of genotype bro-2, and their resistance to antibiotic agents was not of statistical difference ( P 〉0.05 ).Conclusions Most of Branhemella catarrhalis clinical isolates are β-lactamase producing strains, and bro-1 is the most common genotype.Strains are highly sensitive to carbapenems, cephalosporins andβ-Lactamaseinhibitors, which can be recommended for the treatment of Branhemella catarrhalis-related respiratory tract infections.
出处 《中华临床感染病杂志》 CAS 2015年第3期253-257,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases
基金 国家自然科学基金(81400586)
关键词 呼吸道感染 卡他布兰汉菌 Β-内酰胺酶类 微生物敏感性试验 bro基因 Respiratory tract infection Branhemella catarrhalis beta-Lactamases Microbial sensitivity tests bro gene
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1MurrayPR,BaronEJ,JorgensenJH,et al.Manual of clinical microbiology[M].9th edition. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology,2007:774–775.
  • 2KhanMA,NorthwoodJB,LevyF,et al.Bro {beta}–lactamase and antibiotic resistances in a global cross–sectional study of Moraxella catarrhalis from children and adults[J].J Antimicrob Chemother,2010,65(1):91–97.
  • 3车大钿(综述),张育才(审校).卡他莫拉菌研究进展[J].国际儿科学杂志,2010,37(2):206-208. 被引量:5
  • 4British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC). BSAC Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing[S].2009:47–48.
  • 5孙淑红,胡晓峰,朱德全.儿童下呼吸道卡他布兰汉菌的分离培养及耐药性分析[J].中华临床感染病杂志,2011,4(3). 被引量:4
  • 6祁莉,张晓颖,罗少锋.临床分离的卡他莫拉菌对抗菌药物敏感性分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2012,22(2):407-408. 被引量:7
  • 7JetterM,HeinigerN,SpaniolV,et al.Outer membrane porin M35 of Moraxella catarrhalis mediates susceptibility to aminopenicillins[J].BMC Microbiol,2009,9:188.
  • 8MarionJ,VioletaS,RolfT,et al.Down–regulation of porin M35 in Moraxella catarrhalis by aminopenicillins and environmental factors and its potential contribution to the mechanism of resistance to aminopenicillins[J].J Antimicrob Chemother,2010,65(10):2089–2096.
  • 9MorrisseyI,MaharK,WilliamsL,et al.Non–susceptibility trends among Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis from community–acquired respiratory tract infections in the UK and Ireland, 1999–2007[J].J Antimicrob Chemother,2008,62(2):97–103.
  • 10SpijkermanJ,PrevaesSM,van GilsEJ,et al.Long–term effects of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on nasopharyngeal carriage of S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis[J/OL].PLoS One,2012,7(6):e39730.

二级参考文献28

  • 1刘长海.健康人群上呼吸道黏膜炎莫拉菌分离报道[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2006,16(1):117-117. 被引量:1
  • 2Morrissey I, Maher K, Williams L, et al. Non-susceptlbility trends among Haemophilus influenzae and MoraxeUa catarrhalis from community-acquired respiratory tract infections in the UK and Ireland, 1997-2007. J Antimicrob Chemother,2008,62(Suppl 2) : ii97-103.
  • 3Jones RN, Sader HS, Fritsche TR, et al. Comparisons of parenteral broadspectrum cephalosporins tested against bacterial isolates from pediatric patients: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1998-2004). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2007,57( 1 ) : 109-116.
  • 4Verhaeqh SJ, Streefland A, Dew.train JK, et al. Age-related genotypic and phenotypic differences in MoraxeUa catarrhalis isolates from children and adults presenting with respiratory disease in 2001-2002. Microbiology, 2008,154(pt4) : 1178-1184.
  • 5Yamanaka N, Hotomi M, Billal DS. Clinical bacteriology and immunology in acute otitis media in children. J Infect Chemother, 2008, 14 (3) : 180- 187.
  • 6Wirth T, Morelli G, Kusecek B,et al.The rise and spred of a new pathogen: seroresistant Moraxella catarrhalis. Genome Res,2007, 17( 11 ) : 1647-1656.
  • 7Verduin CM, Kools-Sijmons M, Van der Plas J, et al. Complement-resistant Moraxella catarrhalis forms a genetically distinct lineage within the species. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2000,184( 1 ) : 1-8.
  • 8Yu S, Gu XX. Synthesis and characterization of Lipooligosaccharide-based conjugate vaccines for serotype B Moraxella catarrhalis. Infect Immun, 2005,73(5) :2790-2796.
  • 9Peng D, Hong W, Choudhury BP, et al. Moraxella catarrhalis bacterium without endotoxin, a potential vaccine andidate. Infect Immun, 2005, 73 ( 11 ) : 7569-7577.
  • 10Adlowitz DG,Sethi S, Culen P, et al. Human antibody response to outer membrane protein Gla, a lipoprotein of Moraxella catarrhalis. Infect Immun, 2005,73 (10) : 6601-6607.

共引文献13

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部