论指导性案例制度的冗余与亏空——兼驳“同案同判”与“裁判可接受性”

On the Redundancy and the Deficit of Case Guidance System:Refuting "Treat the same case equally" and "judicial acceptability"

"指导性案例制度"在制度与法理层面是冗余的。在制度的"指导性"分析上其无法回应作为实证主义的法律体系理论的挑战,在法理及案件裁判效果上亦无法摆脱作为"裁判可接受性"的理论硬伤。法条主义的延续与"解释学循环"则在制度的"方法一阐释学"意义上重创了作为立法/司法哲学的指导性案例理论的展开。另外,法治体系理论无法容忍案例指导制度实施后的规范繁杂、琐碎与"非融贯性"。在法理论意义上,指导性案例制度是冗余进而亏空的。

“Case guidance system” is redundant in the institutional and legal theory because in the“guidance” analysis of system, it cannot respond to the challenge from the theory of positivist legal system;furthermore, in legal theory and judicial effect, it cannot escape the fatal theoretical mishap of “the acceptability of judicial decisions”. In the sense of “method-hermeneutics” of system, the lastingness of legalism and “hermeneutic circle” hit strongly the practice of the case guidance theory which is regarded as legislative/judicial philosophy. In addition, the theory of legal system can not tolerate the specification which is complicated, trivial and “caused by the non coherence” after the implementation of case guidance system. In the legal theory, “case guidance system” is redundant and then deficit.