期刊文献+

新型试样固定装置在微拉伸测试中的应用 被引量:2

New fixation set-up designed for micro-tensile test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:介绍一种新型的条状试样固定方式,应用于微拉伸测试粘接强度。方法:以临床常用牙科粘接剂Adper TM Single Bond 2(SB2)制作树脂-牙本质粘接试件,切割成条状试样,随机分为2组进行微拉伸强度测试:Ciucchi's夹具(对照组)和本试验装置(实验组),场发射扫描电镜观察试样断裂界面,卡方检验分析断裂模式;建立固定装置及夹具的三维有限元模型,计算机模拟分析拉伸试验中试样应力分布方式。结果:实验组与对照组的粘接强度(MPa)分别为32.76±7.43和43.58±4.72(P<0.05);实验组和对照组粘接界面混合断裂模式分别为28/36和20/36(P<0.05);有限元分析结果显示实验组在测试过程中拉伸力沿试样长轴传导,垂直粘接界面,断裂界面应力分布均匀。结论:该实验介绍的条状试样固定方法实用于微拉伸强度应力的测定。 Objective: To introduce a new fixation set-up for micro-tensile test. Methods: Dentin-composite were bonded with AdperTM Single Bond 2 (SB2) and sectioned into stick-shaped specimens. Specimens from each tooth (n = 6) were equally divided into Ciucchi jig and the designed set-up (Control and experimental) groups for micro-tensile bond test according to the utilized fixa- tion set-up. The bonding interface failure mode was examined with field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). Three- dimensional models of the two set-ups and the specimen were developed, stress distribution was analyzed by finite element analysis (FEA). Results : The bond strength(MPa) of experimental and control group was 32.76 ± 7.43 and 43.58 ± 4.72 ( P 〈 0.05 ), the ratio of mixed failure was 28/36 and 20/36(P 〈 0.05 ) respectively. FEA showed that the designed set-up for fixing the sticks pro- vided a uniform stress distribution along the long axis of the specimen. FEA and failure mode analysis confirmed such uniform distri- bution was also concentrated at the bonding interface. Conclusion: The new set-up is feasible for micro-tensile test.
出处 《实用口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期455-459,共5页 Journal of Practical Stomatology
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号:81170985 81130078)
关键词 微拉伸测试 断裂模式 应力分布 有限元分析(FEA) Micro- tensile test Failure mode Stress distribution Finite element analysis (FEA)
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Sinhoreti MA, Consani S, De Goes MF, et al. Influence of loading types on the shear strength of the dentin-resin inter- face bonding[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2001, 12(1) :39 - 44.
  • 2Zhao S J, Zhang L, Tang LH, et al. Nanoleakage and micro- tensile bond strength at the adhesive-dentin interface after different etching times[J]. Am J Dent, 2010, 23 (6) :335 - 340.
  • 3Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, et al. Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of "micro" bond strength test methods [ J ]. Dent Mater, 2010, 26 (2) : e50 - 3e62.
  • 4Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength Eval- uation of a micro-tensile bond test[ J]. Dent Mater, 1994, 10(4) :236 -240.
  • 5Raposo LH, Armstrong SR, Maia RR, et al. Effect of speci-aen gripping device, geometry and fixation method on mi- rotensile bond strength, failure mode and stress distribu- tion : Laboratory and finite element analyses [ J ]. Dent Ma- Ler, 2012, 28(5):e50-e62.
  • 6Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, et al. Influence of three specimen fixation modes on the micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin[ J ]. Dent Mater J, 2007, 26 (5) :694-699.
  • 7Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, et al. Critical a- nalysis of the influence of different parameters on the micro- tensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin [ J 1. J Adhes Dent,2008,10( 1 ) :7 - 16.
  • 8Chung SM, Yap AU, Koh WK, et al. Measurement of Pois- son ratio of dental composite restorative materials [ J]. Bio- materials ,2004,25 ( 13 ) :2455 - 2460.
  • 9Soares C J, Raposo LH, Soares PV, et al. Effect of different cements on the biomechanical behavior of teeth restored with cast dowel-and-cores-in vitro and FEA analysis [ J ]. J Prosthodont, 2010,19 (2) : 130 - 137.
  • 10Betamar N, Cardew G, Van Noort R. Influence of specimen designs on the microtensile bond strength to dentin [ J 1. J Adhes Dent, 2007, 9(2):159-168.

二级参考文献15

  • 1马楚凡,李冬梅,陈吉华,叶晓兰.采用ERA弹性附着体修复牙列游离端缺损[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2006,22(4):575-577. 被引量:12
  • 2石亦平,周玉蓉.ABAQUS有限元分析实例详解[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2008.
  • 3Daas M, Dubois G, Bonnet AS, et al. A complete finite el- ement model of a mandibular implant-retained overdenture with two implants: Comparison between rigid and resilient attachment configurations [ J]. Med Eng Phys, 2008, 30 (2) :218 -225.
  • 4Mahmoud AA, Wakabayashi N, Takahashi H. Prediction of permanent deformation in cast clasps for denture prostheses using a validated nonlinear finite element model [ J ]. Dent Mater, 2007, 23(3):317-324.
  • 5Kibi M, Ono T, Dong J, et al. Development of an RPD CAD system with finite element stress analysis [ J ]. J Oral Rehabil, 2009, 36(6):442-450.
  • 6Aydin AK, Tekkaya AE. Stresses induced by different load- ings around weak abutments[ J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1992, 68 (6) :879 - 884.
  • 7Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. Elastic modulus of the periodontal ligament[J]. Biomaterials, 1997, 18(14) :995-999.
  • 8Augereau D, Renault P, Pierrisnard L, et al. Three-dimen- sional finite element analysis of the retention of fixed partial deotures[Jl. Clin Oral Invest, 1997, 1(3):141 -146.
  • 9Pellizzer EP, Verri FR, Falcoh-Antenueci RM, etal. Eval- uation of different retention systems on a distal extension re- movable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2010, 21 (3) :727 - 734,.
  • 10Wada S, Wakabayashi N, Tanaka T, et al. Influence of abutment selection in maxillary Kennedy Class II RPD on elastic stress distribution in oral nmcosa: An FEM study [ J ]. J Prnsthodont, 2006, 15 (2) :89 - 94.

共引文献7

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部