期刊文献+

高中物理学业水平考试与课程标准的一致性研究 被引量:21

A Study of Consistency Between Senior High School Physics Academic Achievement Test and Curriculum Standard
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着新一轮高考综合改革试点的启动,高中学业水平考试的权威性和应用性进一步增强。高中学业水平考试与课程标准的一致性对全面落实新课程目标,深化课程、教学和评价改革具有重要意义。采用课程实施调查模式判别物理学业水平考试试卷与课程标准的一致性,其结果表明两者不具备一致性。与课程标准相比,物理学业水平考试试卷在内容主题和认知水平的侧重均有一定程度的偏差。建立学业评价标准和构建专业化水准考试评价体系是提高学业水平考试与课程标准一致性的关键所在。而学业水平考试是学生毕业和升学的重要依据,建议增加高中理科学业水平实验操作考试,并由省级教育行政部门组织实施,确保实验操作考试的可信度和公信力。 With the startup of a new round of the comprehensive reform pilot for the College Entrance Examination, the authority and applicability of senior high school academic achievement test are further enhanced. The consistency between senior high school academic achievement test and curriculum standard is significant for achieving the new curriculum objectives, and deepening the reform of curriculum, teaching and assessment. Using Surveys of Enacted Curriculum consistency methodology to inspect the consistency between physics academic achievement test papers and curriculum standard, we found that there is no consistency between them. Compared with the curriculum standard, the physics academic achievement test papers have a certain degree of deviation in both content theme and cognitive level. To improve the consistency between academic achievement test and curriculum standard, it is critical to build academic assessment standard and professional assessment system. Academic achievement test is the important basis for students~ graduation and further study. Therefore, we suggest that a senior high school science academic achievement experimental operation test could be added. To ensure the credibility and public trust of the experimental operation test, and it is best to be organized and implemented by the provincial education administrative department.
作者 王焕霞
出处 《课程.教材.教法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第8期60-66,共7页 Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
基金 全国教育科学"十二五"规划2014年度教育部青年专项课题"教学与课程标准的一致性评价指标体系构建及实践研究"(EHA140392)
关键词 学业水平考试 课程标准 一致性 实验操作考试 academic achievement test curriculum standard consistency experimental operation test
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1教育部.教育部关于普通高中学业水平考试的实施意见[z].教基二(2014)10号,2014-12-10.
  • 2国务院.国务院关于深化考试招生制度改革的实施意见[Z]2014-09-03.
  • 3王焕霞,廖伯琴.我国高中学业水平考试的实践困境与制度审思[J].教育学报,2011,7(6):77-83. 被引量:14
  • 4Webb N L. Issues Related to Judging the Alignment of Curriculum Standards and Assessments [-J ]. Applied Measurement in Education, 2007, 20 (1): 7-25.
  • 5Porter A C. Measuring the Content of Instruction: U- ses in Research and Practice[J]. Educational Researc- her, 2002,31(7) :3 - 14.
  • 6Rothman R, Slattery J t3, Vranek J L, Resnick L 13. Benchmarking and Alignment of Standards and Testing[D13/OL]. http://research, ese. ucla. edu/Re- ports/TR566.pdf.2002.
  • 7Fulmer G W. Estimating Critical Values for Strengthof Alignment Among Curriculum, Assessments, and instruction[J]. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2011,36(6) : 381-402.
  • 8Webb N L. Alignment of Science and Mathematics Standards and Assessments in Four State: Council of Chief State School Officers and National Institute for Science FAucafion, Madison, WI: University of Wiscon- sin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. 1999. [DB/OL] http://facataff, wcer. wise. edu/normw/ WEBBMonograph: 2018 Alignment_Paper. pdL.
  • 9教育部.普通高中物理课程标准(实验)[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2003.
  • 10杨小微.教育研究方法[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2005.

二级参考文献11

  • 1山东省教育厅.关于印发《山东省普通高中学生学业水平考试工作管理暂行规定》的通知[Z].鲁教基字[2005]16号,2005-1i-23.
  • 2上海市教育委员会.上海市教育委员会关于实施上海市普通高中学业水平考试的通知[Z].沪教委基[2009]53号,2009-06-23.
  • 3崔允济,王少非,夏雪梅.基于标准的学生学业成就评价[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2008:35-43.
  • 4Board of Studies NSW. Assessment, Certification and Examination (ACE) Manual[-EB/OL] . ( 2006-01-20) [2011- 08-08]. http..//www, boardofstudies, nsw. edu. au/manu als/acemanual, html.
  • 5Ohio Department of Education Office of Assessment. Ohio Statewide Assessment Program Rules BookI-EB/OL]. [2010-09-24] http://edueation, ohio. gov/GD/Templates/Pages/ODE/ODEDetail, aspx? page = 3b-Topic RelationlD= 9&ContentID= 43712.
  • 6Webb, N. L. Issues related to judging the alignment of curriculum standards and assessments [ J ]. Applied Measurement in Education, 2007,20 ( 1 ), 7-25.
  • 7盛海萍,张茂聪.冲突与整合:学分制与学业水平考试的合理性透视[J].中国教育学刊,2007(11):43-46. 被引量:4
  • 8肖燃,乐国林.新课改背景下高中学业水平考试组织管理创新探析[J].河北师范大学学报(教育科学版),2009,11(3):124-129. 被引量:5
  • 9刘决生.我国普通高中学业水平考试存在的问题与对策[J].上海教育科研,2010(3):39-42. 被引量:18
  • 10杨向东,崔允漷.关于高中学业水平考试的比较研究[J].全球教育展望,2010,39(4):7-14. 被引量:27

共引文献58

同被引文献216

引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部