期刊文献+

腹腔镜阑尾切除术行改良三孔法43例研究报告 被引量:1

Modified three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: 43 Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:讨论腹腔镜阑尾切除术行改良三孔法的临床意义.方法:回顾性分析2014年1月至2015年1月43例急性阑尾炎行改良三孔法患者的手术资料. 结果:43例病人均顺利完成手术,手术时间30-70分钟,平均40分钟.术后住院时间3-8天,平均5天.术后1例戳卡处感染,换药后好转.所有病例随访2-12月,平均7个月,无明显后期并发症发生.结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用改良三孔法相对其他手术方式美容效果更好. Objective:To explore the clinical application of modified three-port laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data of 43 patients undergoing modified three-port laparoscopic appendectomy in our hospital during January 2014 to January 2015. Results: The modified three-port laparoscopic appendectomy was performed successfully in all the 43 patients. Average operation time was 40 min (30-70min). Average hospitalization time was 5 days (3-8 days). Postoperative infection occurred in 1 patient, who was given regular dress changes until the wound healed. All the patients were followed up for 2 to 12 months, with an average follow-up time of 7 months. No complication occurred. Conclusion: Modified three-port laparoscopic appendectomy has shown its reliability in clinical application and it is features of better cosmetic outcomes.
作者 何沙
出处 《中外女性健康研究》 2015年第11期3-4,共2页 Women's Health Research
关键词 腹腔镜阑尾切除术 改良三孔法 临床意义 Laparoscopic appendectomy Modified three-port method
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1王育和,刘家峰,徐大华,李非,孙家邦.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(12):1184-1185. 被引量:77
  • 2胡三元,张光永,于文滨,李波,张海峰,王可新.腹腔内留置钛夹转归的实验研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2004,19(7):438-439. 被引量:34
  • 3Cueto J,DAˊllemagne B,Vazquez-Frias J A,et al.Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis:an international study[J].Surg Endosc,2006,20(5):717-720.
  • 4Street D,Bodai B I,Owens L J,et al.Simple ligation vs stump inversion in appendectomy[J].Arch Surg,1988,123(4):689-690.
  • 5黄志强主编.现代腹腔镜外科学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,1996:206-207.
  • 6Chau CH, Tang CN, Siu WT, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomyversus open cholecystectomy in elderly patients with acutecholecystitis; retrospective study. Hong Kong Med J,2002,8(6):394 -399.
  • 7Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, et al.Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopiccholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy : arandomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc, 2010,24 ( 8 ) : 1842 -1848.
  • 8Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgeryversus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of arandomised trial. Lancet Oncol,2005 ,6(7) :477 - 484.
  • 9Kommu SS, Rane; A. Devices for laparoendoscopic single-sitesurgery in urology. Expert Rev Med Devices,2009 ,6(1) :95 - 103.
  • 10Tugcu V, Ilbey YO, Mutlu B, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-sitesurgery versus standard laparoscopic simple nephrectomy : aprospective randomized study. J Endourol, 2010, 24 ( 8 ) : 1315 -1320.

共引文献128

同被引文献19

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部