期刊文献+

客观性证据审查模式与疑罪从无 被引量:1

On Mode of Objective Evidence Examine and No Punishment in Doubtful Case
下载PDF
导出
摘要 客观性证据审查模式是以浙江省检察院为代表的实务部门在办理刑事案件过程中摸索、总结出来的一种证据审查模式,由最高人民检察院先后两次在全国推广,引起了全国的广泛关注和各地实务部门的争相学习,其优势集中体现在对于刑事冤假错案的防范和纠正上。疑罪从无是现代刑事司法体系的重要原则,在促进人权司法保障、防范和纠正冤错案件、维护司法权威、实现司法公正方面起着不可替代的作用,但由于种种原因,疑罪从无在我国贯彻实施并不理想。客观性证据审查模式的提出,有利于疑罪从无原则的落实,可体现在克服口供中心主义、维护司法独立、推进审判中心主义等方面。 The mode of objective evidence examine is a kind of mode of evidence examine groped and summarized in the process of handling criminal case by the practical department of Zhejiang Province Procuratorate.The Supreme People's Procuratorate has popularized twice to the whole nation and has aroused wide concern by the whole nation and all the practical departments started to learn.The advantages are focused on the prevention and correction of the criminal cases in which people were unjustly,falsely or wrongly charged or sentenced.No punishment in doubtful case is an important principle of the modern criminal judicial system.It has an irreplaceable role in promoting the judicial guarantee of human rights,preventing and correcting wrongly cases,maintaining judicial authority and realizing judicial justice.But due to various reasons,the implementation of no punishment in doubtful case in our country is not satisfactory.The proposal of the mode of objective evidence examine will benefit the implementation of the principle of no punishment in doubtful case,which can be embodied in overcoming the suspects'statements as the core of procedure,maintaining the independence of the judiciary and promoting the trial as the core of procedure.
作者 李思远
出处 《衡阳师范学院学报》 2015年第4期83-88,共6页 Journal of Hengyang Normal University
关键词 客观性证据审查模式 疑罪从无 口供中心主义 司法独立 审判中心主义 mode of objective evidence examine no punishment in doubtful case the suspects'statements as the core of procedure independence of the judiciary trial as the core of procedure
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献43

  • 1孙长永.审判中心主义及其对刑事程序的影响[J].现代法学,1999,21(4):93-97. 被引量:175
  • 2宋英辉.刑事案件事实认定中的几个问题[J].政法论坛,1991,9(1):36-39. 被引量:9
  • 3季卫东.程序比较论[J].比较法研究,1993,7(1):1-46. 被引量:734
  • 4许艳芳.试论回溯推理[J].保定师范专科学校学报,2006,19(1):9-11. 被引量:1
  • 5[意]切萨雷·贝卡利亚.《论犯罪与刑罚》,黄风译,北京大学出版社2008年版,第7页.
  • 6沈德咏.《法学精要》,华艺出版社1995年版,第120页.
  • 7培根.《论司法》,载《培根论说文集》,商务印书馆1983年版,第194页.
  • 8[美]戈尔丁 齐海滨译.《法律哲学》[M].[北京]三联书店,1987年版.第189页.
  • 9[日]松尾浩也.《日本刑事诉讼法》(下卷),张凌译,中国人民大学出版社,2005年版,第318页,第319页.
  • 10沈德咏.《我们应当如何防范冤假错案》,载《人民法院报》2013年5月7日.

共引文献191

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部