期刊文献+

翻译之“应该”的元理论研究:背景、任务与意义 被引量:1

A Meta-theoretical Study on “Ought” of Translation:Background,Tasks and Significance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对"忠实"的质疑与批判在根本上撼动着二千余年来译界学人们的固有信念,影响着翻译研究这一学科内部最基本的价值判断方式,同时也将翻译之"应该"的元理论研究这一课题推上了重要的议事日程。论文以剖析元理论研究之特点和意义为起点,在检视"忠实"解构论及其所带来的价值迷惘与困惑的基础上,交代了翻译之"应该"的元理论问题产生背景,探讨了翻译之"应该"的元理论研究任务,最后从理论和实践两方面指出了翻译之"应该"的元理论研究意义。 The prevailing skepticism cast upon both the rationality and validity of"faithfulness"has shaken the two-thousandyear old conviction inherent in translation scholars'mind,challenged the basic value system within the discipline of translation studies,and made the meta-theoretical study on the"ought"of translation an important project in the agenda.With a brief introduction of meta-theoretical study as its starting point,with a quick survey on the current research on the"ought"of translation as its basis,this paper sets the background of the meta-theoretical project,raises meta-theoretical questions concerning the basis and foundation of the study on the"ought"of translation and demonstrates the significance of the project from practical and theoretical perspectives.
作者 张冬梅
出处 《衡阳师范学院学报》 2015年第4期138-142,共5页 Journal of Hengyang Normal University
基金 湖南省社会科学基金项目"断裂与延续:翻译规范的学术史研究"(12YBA114)的阶段性成果之一
关键词 翻译 “应该” 元理论研究 背景 任务 意义 translation "ought" meta-theoretical study background tasks significance
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Holmes, James. Translated! Papers on Literary Trans- lation and Translation Studies [M] . Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2007: 67-80.
  • 2张青松.当代理论发展趋势的元思考——广义元理论研究之三[J].理论探讨,2006(3):145-148. 被引量:1
  • 3赫曼斯.翻译的再现[M]//谢天振.翻译的理论建构与文化透视.上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000:1-20.
  • 4拉斐尔.道德哲学[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社·牛津大学出版社,1998:86.
  • 5Hermans, Theo. Introduction: Translation Studies and a New Paradigm [M] // The Manipulation of Litera- ture: Studies in Literary Translation. ed. by Hermans, Theo. London and Sydney: Croom Helm, 1985: 11.
  • 6Long, Lynne. History and Translation [M] // A Companion to Translation Studies . eds. by Kuhiwc- zak, Piotr & Karin Littau. Clevedom Multilingual Matters Ltd. , 2007: 64.
  • 7Chesterman, Andrew. Proposal for a Hieronymic Oath [M] // The Return to Ethics. ed. by Anthony Pyre. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing, 2001: 147.
  • 8卢风.道德选择、道德困境与“道德悖论”[J].哲学动态,2009(9):43-50. 被引量:21

二级参考文献10

  • 1岳天雷.高拱的权变方法论及其实践价值[J].孔子研究,2001(3):94-103. 被引量:13
  • 2戴维·弗里德曼.《弗里德曼的生活经济学》,赵学凯等译,中信出版社,2003,第231页.
  • 3Hilary Putnam, Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge University Press, 1981, pp. 22 - 74.
  • 4John Rawls,Political Liberalism, Columbia University Press, New York, 1996, p. 36,p. 144.
  • 5马丁·科恩.《101个人生悖论》,陆丁译,新华出版社,2007.
  • 6Alasdair MaCintyre, Ethics and Politics, Selected Essays, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 86, pp. 86 - 87, pp. 87 - 88, p. 90, p. 93, p. 92, p. 94, p. 98.
  • 7让·保罗·萨特.《存在主义是一种人道主义》,周煦良,汤永宽译,上海译文出版社,1988,第13-15页.
  • 8罗伯特·艾克斯罗德.《对策中的制胜之道-合作的进化》,吴坚忠译,上海人民出版社,1996,第6-8页.
  • 9钱广荣.《道德悖论的本质与模态》,《光明日报》2008年9月2日.
  • 10.《孟子》[M].,..

共引文献24

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部