期刊文献+

应用细胞方法建立表面活性剂眼刺激性分层筛选模型 被引量:1

Establishment of a tiered screening model for testing eye irritation of surfactants by in vitro methods
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的建立表面活性剂眼刺激性测试的体外细胞方法分层筛选模型。方法应用中性红摄取试验(NRU)、红细胞溶血试验(RBCH)及荧光素漏出试验(FLT)3种体外细胞方法对20种表面活性剂的眼刺激性进行检测,将检测结果代入4种分层筛选模型(FLT+NRU、FLT+RBCH、RBCH+NRU、NRU+RBCH),所得到的分级结果与Draize试验结果进行比较(指标为Gamma系数、Mc Nemar-Bowker系数、Kappa系数和分级一致率),以此来评价4种分层筛选模型对表面活性剂的检测效能。结果本研究建立的4种分层筛选模型(FLT+NRU、FLT+RBCH、RBCH+NRU、NRU+RBCH)与Draize试验分级结果进行比较,分级一致率分别为90.0%、80.0%、80.0%、65.0%,Kappa值分别为0.84、0.68、0.69、0.47(均P<0.01),Gamma值分别为1.00、1.00、0.93、0.88(均P<0.01)。结论以FLT(第1层)和NRU(第2层)组成的分层筛选模型较其他3种模型具有较好的检测效能,更适合应用于对表面活性剂的眼刺激性检测。 Objective To establish a tiered screening model for testing eye irritation of surfac- tants. Methods Twenty surfactants were tested with FLT, RBCH, and NRU methods, then the test results were plugged into four screening models ( FLT + NRU, FLT + RBCH, RBCH + NRU, NRU + RBCH) and compared the grading results with those of Draize test ( based on the indices of Gamma coefficient, Mc- Nemar-Bowker coefficient, Kappa coefficient, and concordance rate). Finally, the predictive abilities of the four tiered screening models for eye irritation of surfactants were evaluated. Results Compared with the results of Draise test, the concordance rates of grading results of four screening models ( FLT + NRU, FLT + RBCH, RBCH + NRU, NRU + RBCH) evaluated in this study were 90.0% , 80.0%, 80.0% , and 65.0% , respectively; the Kappa values were 0.84, 0.68, 0.69, and 0. 47, respectively (P 〈 0. 01 for all) ; the Gamma values were 1.00, 1.00, 0. 93, and 0.88, respectively (P 〈 0.01 for all). Conclusion The tiered screen model composed of FLT test (1st stage) and NRU test (2nd stage) has better detection performance than the other 3 models and is more suitable for the eye irritation detection of the surfactants.
出处 《华南预防医学》 2015年第4期318-322,共5页 South China Journal of Preventive Medicine
关键词 表面活性剂 眼刺激 动物 实验 Surfactants Eye irritation Animals laboratory
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1孙淑华,李真,万晓萌.表面活性剂行业现状及发展趋势[J].精细与专用化学品,2012,20(3):7-10. 被引量:5
  • 2Botham PA, Hayes AW, Moir D, et al. The international sympo- sium on regulatory testing and animal welfare: recommendations on best scientific practices for acute local skin and eye toxicity tes- ting [J]. ILARJ, 2002, 43(5) :105 -107.
  • 3Liebsch M, Spielmann H. Currently available in vitro methodsused in the regulatory toxicology [ J ]. Toxicology Letters, 2002,22 (3) :127 -134.
  • 4Gemer I, Schlede E. Introduction of in vitro data into local irrita- tion/ corrosion testing strategies by means of SAR considerations : assessment of chemicals [ J ]. Toxicology Letters, 2002,22 ( 3 ) : 167 - 175.
  • 5Grindon C, Combes R, Cronin MT,et al. An integrated decision- tree testing strategy for eye irritation with respect to the require- ments of the EU REACH legislation[J]. ATLA,2008, 36(4) :81 - 92.
  • 6McNamee P, Hibatallah J, Costabel-Farkas M,et al. A tiered ap- proach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety as- sessment of cosmetics : eye irritation [ J ]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology,2009, 23(6) :89- 102.
  • 7Benavides T, Martinez V, Mitjans M, et al. Assessment of the potential irritation and photoirritation of novel amino acid based surfactants by in vitro methods as alternative to the animal test [J]. Toxicolo~, 2004, 201(13) : 87 -93.
  • 8Jones PA, Bracher M, Marenus K, et al. Performance of the neutral red uptake assay in the COLIPA international validation study on alternatives to the rabbit eye irritation test [ J ]. Toxicology in Vitro, 1999,13(3) : 325 -333.
  • 9OECD. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals No. 460 : flu- orescein leakage test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants[ R]. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development ,2012.
  • 10中华人民共和国卫生部.化妆品卫生规范(2007年版)[s].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.

共引文献4

同被引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部