期刊文献+

New European Union's Requirements and IFRS Practice Statement "Management Commentary": Does MD&A Disclosure Quality Affect Analysts' Forecasts?

New European Union's Requirements and IFRS Practice Statement "Management Commentary": Does MD&A Disclosure Quality Affect Analysts' Forecasts?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is a mandatory document under the European Union's (EU) law. In 2003, the EU issued Directive 2003/51/EC, which broadened the information that firms have to provide in their MD&A, and in 2010 the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Practice Statement "Management Commentary", a non-binding guidance for the presentation of this document. The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between MD&A disclosure quality and properties of analysts' forecasts. In fact, although most studies found that financial analysts mainly refer to financial statement data in forecasting earnings, there are few researches highlighting the importance of MD&A disclosures for financial analysts. On this basis, Ramnath, Rock, and Shane (2008) called for researches in order to better understand the relationship between the information really used by analysts and their forecasts. To assess the quality of MD&A disclosures, we developed a multidimensional measure on the basis of the EU requirements and the IFRS Practice Statement, and then we regressed this variable on both forecast accuracy and dispersion. The findings show that our measure of MD&A disclosure quality is significantly and positively related to forecast accuracy. We conducted other analyses in order to better understand the previous relationship and we found that, if we analyze the different information contained in the MD&A statement, financial analysts consider useful accounting and financial data in forecasting earnings. These results enhance our understanding of the role of MD&A disclosures in the wide set of information that firms provide to financial statement users.
机构地区 Parthenope University
出处 《Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing》 2015年第6期283-301,共19页 现代会计与审计(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献95

  • 1Aljifri, K. (2008). Annual report disclosure in a developing country: The case of the UAE. Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 24( 1 ), 93-100.
  • 2American Institute of Certified Public Accountants [AICPA] (1994). Improving business reporting. A customer focus. New York.
  • 3Barron, O. E., & Kile, C. O. (1999). MD&A quality as measured by the SEC and analysts' earnings forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(1), 75-109.
  • 4Beattie, V., Mclnnes, W., & Fearnley, S. (2004). A methodology for analyzing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: A comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Accounting Forum, 28(3), 205-236.
  • 5Beattie, V., Mclnnes, W., & Pierpoint, J. (2008). The management commentary: Comparing narrative outcomes from alternative regulatory regimes. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, London.
  • 6Benzecri, J. P. (1973). The data analysis. Volume I: Taxonomy. Volume 2." Analysis of correspondence. Paris: Dunod.
  • 7Benzecri, J. P. (1979). Calculation of the inertia ratio in the analysis of a questionnaire. Journal of Data Analysis, 4, 377-378.
  • 8Beretta, S., & Bozzolan, S. (2008). Quantity vs. quality: The case of forward-looking disclosure. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, 23(3), 333-375.
  • 9Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review, 72(3), 323-350.
  • 10Bryan, S. H. (1997). Incremental information content of required disclosures contained in management discussion and analysis. The Accounting Review, 72(2), 285-301.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部